The thing is... Disney was right. They didn't just talk a big game. Frozen<\/em> was<\/strong> the greatest animated event since The Lion King<\/em>. How did they know? Clearly the studio was confident in the story. But they've released movies with great stories plenty of times that failed to gain traction with audiences. Could Disney identify the factors that made a long-term classic and not just a trendy moment, a passing fad? Could they see that these attributes, paired with a story they knew would connect with people, cemented Frozen<\/em>'s legacy as something that would withstand through the ages as much as the studio's greatest triumphs of yore? Somehow, whether because they've been around the block a few times and they know the signs of a hit ahead of a release, or because of sheer blind faith speaking success into existence, they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\nNow in retrospect, do you agree with what Disney predicted in 2013? Was Frozen the greatest Disney animated event since The Lion King? Do you believe we're still in the Disney Revival with Frozen 2? <\/em><\/h3>\n","post_title":"[FROZEMBER] The 'Frozen' Phenomenon","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozember-the-frozen-phenomenon","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-06 07:07:47","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-06 14:07:47","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53922","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54598,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-30 16:27:46","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-30 23:27:46","post_content":"The launch of Disney+ on November 12 is now less than two weeks away. Earlier today, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusives to the streaming platform.\n\nPixar IRL<\/strong><\/em> (or, \"in real life\") is a short-form series that will bring the beloved characters of Pixar to reality in the real world. If you're picturing live-action remakes, you'd be mistaken. These moments will be brought to life out and about among unsuspecting citizens, somewhat of a prank show turned on its head. Take a look.\n\n
Will you watch this new Pixar content?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Pixar Reveals Line-Up of Original Programming for Disney+","post_excerpt":"With the launch of Disney+ on November 12 now less than 2 weeks away, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusive to the streaming platform.","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"pixar-reveals-line-up-of-original-programming-for-disney","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-01 16:56:54","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-01 23:56:54","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54596,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-28 17:46:58","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:46:58","post_content":"Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>swept the globe by storm earlier this year<\/a> and recently arrived on home video<\/a>. The film re-sparked a multitude of emotions and conversations<\/a> in its audiences as love poured out once more for arguably Pixar's most beloved franchise. Toy Story <\/em>is special, not only for the milestones it represents as Pixar's first feature and the world's first full-length computer-animated film, but also for what its themes and characters mean to its now multiple generations of viewers. Among the most prominent of observable narratives is Woody's, a character whose motivations, flaws, and changes become more complex with each passing Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>volume, whose arc is fascinating to study.\n\nMany, myself included, questioned if\u00a0Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>was necessary when it was first announced<\/a> in 2015. Toy Story 3, <\/em>released in 2010, felt like such a perfect finale, and within the context of its predecessors, allowed the whole series to function as an admirable trilogy. In nearly every category, Toy Story 3\u00a0<\/em>feels inherently like a bookend. Its opening fantasy sequence calls back the opening of Toy Story<\/em> with Andy's playtime. Its final shot (the iconic blue sky and fluffy clouds) is the first film's first shot. It has the cinematic mechanics of a perfect ending. If\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> was going to prove itself worthy, it needed to do that same legwork. As we're about to explore, it does.\n\n
\n
The Golden Rule of Pixar Sequels<\/h2>\nPixar's justification for sequels is relayed in Charles Solomon's book The Toy Story Films: An Animated Journey<\/em> (published in 2012, before Toy Story 4<\/em> was conceived). Solomon shares how Pixar filmmakers always want a sequel to feel as if it's truly the next chapter of a bigger story that the animators were trying to tell all along. A Pixar sequel should feel as if the story of the series is mapped out from the beginning, even though it isn't.\n\nThat goal works a charm in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a simple move from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> laying out a vital foundation for what was to follow, even if it didn't realize it at the time. Bo Peep was excluded from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, with director Lee Unkrich sharing in the film's bonus material that, as great of a character as she was, it didn't make sense that she would still be in the picture after all those years. Firstly, she was a lamp fixture, not a toy, but more importantly, she never belonged to Andy. She always belonged to his sister, Molly, and it didn't service the story for Andy to have kept her with his other toys as he grew up. Unkrich did state that one of his regrets of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was not featuring Bo in the opening fantasy scene, though perhaps her exclusion here was unknowingly necessary for her re-introduction in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> to pack the punch that it does.\n\n
\n\nUpon seeing\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a friend, he remarked, \"Wow, they really planned all that out well. Not having Bo Peep in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was so smart with what they wanted to do with her in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>.\" And therein I realized that Pixar had achieved its own gold standard:\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> felt like a strategic chapter in a grander story, and therefore had<\/em> to happen to complete the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>narrative.\n\nGetting back to Woody, though, the change that occurs through him in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> is reflected through language. It is the language more than anything that presents\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> as the bookend to\u00a0Toy Story<\/em>, with two key phrases coming to have new meaning: \"being there\" and \"lost toy.\"\n\n
\n
\"Being There\"<\/h2>\nIn\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> during the staff meeting, Woody declares that the toys' job \"isn't about being played with, it's about being there for Andy when he needs us.\" More than anything, that's Woody's priority, and he longs for everyone else to prioritize that, too. There's nothing wrong with that. That should<\/em> be his priority during that stage of his life. He's Andy's toy. Therefore, his job is to be there for Andy.\n\nThroughout\u00a0Toy Story 2<\/em>, this mantra remains the same. At the beginning of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, despite nearly a decade passing and Andy being a teenager about to leave for college, this is still Woody's priority, with that same language being used. In a similar staff meeting (albeit with much less toys, now that Andy is older), Woody echoes, \"This job isn't about being played with, it's about\u2014\" \"\u2014Being there for Andy. We know.\" Jessie interrupts him, clearly having heard this speech before. Woody, perhaps naively, still longs with everything inside of him to be there for Andy.\n\n
\n\nAt the end of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, this phrase and that language comes to have completely new meaning for Woody, as scriptwriter Michael Arndt shares in the book The Art of Toy Story 3<\/em>. Arndt takes us back to that moment: Woody inside Andy's college box, ready to leave the other toys behind. As Andy prepares to say goodbye to his childhood bedroom, his mother steps into the room and becomes emotional at the sight of the room packed up and empty, the ghost of her son's formative years vanished. Andy embraces her, and she implores, \"I just wish I could always be with you.\" Andy replies, \"You will be.\" In that instant, Woody makes a revelation. His entire purpose shifts. Andy's mom will always \"be there\" for Andy, even if she's not physically in the same space as him. And therefore, so can Woody. He doesn't have to go to college with Andy to be there for Andy. This is what drives Woody to switch boxes and go to Bonnie's with the rest of the toys. This life-changing choice is gloriously affirmed for Woody in a way he never thought possible: hearing it directly from Andy himself. As Andy gives Woody to Bonnie, he shares, \"Woody has been my pal for as long as I can remember. He's brave, like a cowboy should be. And kind and smart. But the thing that makes Woody special is he'll never give up on you, ever. He'll be there<\/em> for you, no matter what.\" Andy moves on. And therefore, so can Woody.\n\nOr, so we think. From that point forward, Woody's purpose changes, as he states to Forky in Toy Story 4<\/em>: his job is to \"be there for Bonnie.\" However, his change of ownership is still something Woody is getting used to. He hasn't quite moved on from Andy, even slipping in his explanation to Forky by using Andy's name first before correcting himself. Even though Woody made a huge decision, he's having a hard time accepting the reality of change around him. This is understandable and even expected, given the strong connection Andy and Woody had.\n\nWoody was there for Andy. Now it's his job to be there for Bonnie. But does that make sense? This is the question Woody berates himself for even thinking. It's all but blasphemy to his worldview to wonder if his loyalty to his kid is anything less than permanent. We'll explore how he confronts that internal dialogue a bit later.\n\n
\n
\"Lost Toy\"<\/h2>\nThe other consistent, repeated dialogue that gives us a lot of insight toward Woody's arc is the idea of being a \"lost toy.\" Beginning in\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> and continuing forward, this is the language used to describe a toy misplaced by their owner, and thus doomed to an eternity of unfulfilled purpose, of empty desire. As Andy's mom drives away from the gas station and Woody and Buzz are left at the pump, Woody cries in despair, \"I'm lost! Oh, I'm a lost toy!\" This is his greatest fear. This is his nightmare realized.\n\nIn\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, though, this concept is turned on its head. Bo Peep shows Woody a very different perspective of the idea of a lost toy. For her, being a lost toy is not a woeful product of circumstance, it's a choice she's made \u2014 and that she's proud of.\n\nBo Peep learned that her purpose wasn't as narrow of a concept as she once believed. As \"The Nerdwriter\" observed in a recent YouTube video<\/a>, even\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>'s cinematography tries to send us messages about Woody's worldview in contrast to Bo's newfound perspective. In back-to-back cuts within the same scene, an angle focusing on Bo Peep has a bokeh, blurred background, while the same moment angled toward Woody has a stark, in-focus background, symbolizing her openness to organic decisions and embracing change as opposed to his more plan-oriented, rigid mindset at that point in the story.\n\n
\n\nThat's not to say that Woody is completely static in the first three films. In many ways, he's changed quite a lot. He's grown. For starters, in\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>he does everything in his power to be his kid's favorite toy at all costs, even if it means throwing a new favorite toy out of a window. In Toy Story 4<\/em>, he does everything to protect his kid's new favorite toy, even if it's not him and even if it means throwing himself<\/em> out of a window. Woody has learned to be selfless. He doesn't get it right all the time, but his primary motivation is meeting the needs of others rather than himself. That will be key later.\n\nIn Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody feels a pull (a call, some might even say) toward something different, but because this contradicts so fundamentally with everything he's believed for his entire life, he has difficulty 1.) acknowledging that the thought is something he even has, and 2.) moving forward toward taking action on it.\n\n
\n
Woody Leaves<\/h2>\nUltimately, Woody decides to leave Bonnie's toys \u2014 his family \u2014 to be with Bo Peep and help carnival toys get adopted by kids... In essence, to be a lost toy. What was once his greatest crisis is where he finds his fulfilled purpose. That purpose has transitioned from \"being there for Andy\" to \"being there for his kid\" to finally \"being there for all kids.\" This fluidity of his life's pursuit shows tremendous growth in Woody as an individual and as a character in a way that is instantly applicable in considering what each of us devotes our lives toward achieving.\n\nIt's easy to disqualify Woody's decision. It's understandable and even logical to at first claim it's unwise. Leaving a child to live a life of your own was villainized in Toy Story 2. <\/em>Wasn't the point of that movie was Woody learned NOT to run away from his kid? Woody was pitted as unreasonable when he wanted to leave the other toys to go to college in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>. Wasn't the take-away there, as sung in the Oscar-winning end-credits song, that \"we belong together\"?\n\nThe difference in those circumstances, though, is that in both cases Woody would've been running toward an empty life by abandoning his kid. The museum in Japan. A box in Andy's dorm room. The common factor in both scenarios is an earnestness to choose the path that leads toward meeting someone else's needs vs. satisfying his own. As much as Woody might wish Bonnie needed him, she simply doesn't anymore. She's all but discarded him. Lotso hints at it toward the climax of Toy Story 3<\/em> and Forky brings it to the forefront in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>: truth is in the eye of the beholder, and that means toys and trash might be interchangeable depending on which judge is making the verdict. To Bonnie, Woody has, sadly, become trash. Staying with her serves no purpose. It would be selfish in comparison to the opportunity of his other decision.\n\n
\n\nHere's where we surprisingly find immense value in a place I'd never expect it to be: the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>short films and television specials released 2011-2014. This collection of short-form content brought us some fun diversions in the moment, but ultimately didn't change anything major within the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>universe. Now, though, this extra media shows us something very important: Bonnie, once, truly loved Woody. This is fascinating.\n\nIf we pay close attention to the seasons within these mini-sequels, we notice two separate winter breaks for Bonnie. If\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> concluded at the beginning of a school year, there are two winters during the shorts, and\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> begins at the advent of another new school year, we can assume that the time elapsed between\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>3\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>4<\/em> is at least two years, at a minimum. This puts some longevity on what, to a viewer watching just the feature films consecutively, might seem to be hardly any passage of time.\n\nWhat's more, if the viewer makes the jump from Toy Story 3<\/em> immediately into\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody isn't really shown as being loved by Bonnie. Sure, we get the sequence when she inadvertently takes him home from Sunnyside for playtime in Toy Story 3<\/em>, but that was before we knew he would be her toy at the end. Yes, she plays with him briefly in the opening montage of\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, but quickly in the next scene she chooses to leave him in her closet.\n\nBut in the shorts and TV specials, we see her treating him as equal as any other toy. She brings him when she goes over to friends' houses. She takes him on car trips. She loves him. It's this love that's absent if we skip quickly from Toy Story 3<\/em> to\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Bonnie completely devalued what Andy told her when he gave her Woody. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Woody's torn decision to go with Bo or stay with Bonnie is based only on a misguided concept of loyalty rather than any substantial relationship.\n\n
\n\nSo Woody leaves. Finally, after years of processing who he is, why he's here, and where he belongs in this world, he acknowledges and accepts something he's never been able to before: that the answers to those questions change as time passes. There isn't one concrete definition for who a person is. Life is more fluid than that. And having made his decision and said goodbye to the toys who have been his family for decades, Woody moves on. As Bonnie's family's RV pulls away and Buzz and Woody share one last look, a familiar riff of music inhabits Randy Newman's score \u2014 the exact same cue that played when Woody appeared onscreen for the very first time in 1995. It seems this is a bookend, after all.","post_title":"[OPINION] Woody \u2014 The Character Arc of Pixar's Most Iconic Hero","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"opinion-woody-the-character-arc-of-pixars-most-iconic-hero","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-31 14:19:33","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-31 21:19:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53532","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54529,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-21 14:37:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-21 21:37:43","post_content":"It's been no secret, even from the first teaser last winter, that Frozen 2<\/em> <\/strong>will be epic. If nothing else, the Roman numerals in all the marketing let us know this is going to be a classy affair.\n\nFour new posters released from Disney today continue to highlight the adventurous scope and impressive scale of the sequel, hinting at perhaps a darker, more intricate tale than its predecessor.\n\nOne thing is for sure: WE. CAN'T. WAIT.\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThere's just one month left until Frozen 2 <\/em>debuts in theaters November 22, 2019, directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.\n
Which of these new posters is your favorite?<\/h2>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"'Frozen 2' Character Posters Foreshadow Epic Scale","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozen-2-character-posters-foreshadow-epic-scale","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:52:40","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:52:40","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53826","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54520,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-10 19:17:53","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-11 02:17:53","post_content":"\"In times of old, the world was full of wonder and magic, but times change.\"\n\nThese words herald the arrival of Pixar's newest film,\u00a0Onward<\/em><\/strong>, in theaters March 6th, 2020, from director Dan Scanlon (Monsters University<\/em>). The movie stars Chris Pratt and Tom Holland as elf brothers, living in an enchanted realm like the kind we'd typically see in a medieval story but brought forward into the present day. Check out the full trailer below!\n\n
What was your favorite moment from the Onward<\/em> trailer?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Trailer Premiereth for Pixar's 'Onward' Starring Chris Pratt and Tom Holland","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trailer-premiereth-for-pixars-onward-starring-chris-pratt-and-tom-holland","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:38:13","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:38:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53741","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54517,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-07 20:01:55","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-08 03:01:55","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nI'm a Bob Iger stan. Or, at least, I'm a Bob Iger Twitter stan.\n\nI can't help it. Getting push notifications for his tweets is like Christmas morning each time he takes to the Internet. Posts typically arrive with Iger giddy about a new project, sometimes becoming confused with the subtleties of Twitter. One time he posted about Lucasfilm head Kathy Kennedy and mistakenly tagged a Kennedy parody account. This year on the anniversary of his being named Disney CEO, he tweeted about himself in the third person. Sometimes \u2013\u2013 these are my personal favorite \u2013\u2013 he'll chime in on Disney rumors or criticism with sarcasm, such as when he rebuked Captain Marvel<\/em> naysayers by claiming Disney would build \"a Captain Marvel<\/em> land with 50 Captain Marvel<\/em> attractions, plus Captain Marvel<\/em> cruise ships, hotels, and parades.\" HE. IS. WORTH. THE. FOLLOW. GO. FOLLOW. HIM.\n\nAnyway, these remarks (both in tone and in typo errors) feel out of place for the otherwise professional, businesslike stance Iger takes nearly everywhere else he publicly communicates. For the leader of a major corporation, Iger's tweets humanize him and remind us that he's a real person with, apparently, quite an offbeat personality that doesn't often come across in interviews. The same revelatory experience is found in Iger's new book, The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of The Walt Disney Company. <\/em>Curiously published from Random House rather than Disney Editions, the book pairs legends from his Disney tenure with practical leadership advice. This goes all the way back to 1974, when Iger began his first job with ABC. Many times throughout the book, Iger writes directly to the reader with wisdom relating not just to the business world, but to professional relationships, work\/life balance, friendships in the workplace, and other topics. The purpose is clearly to impart wisdom from major career moments rather than be a biography, and the extrapolation of proverbial business lessons is a large part of the narrative here.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThe book reads as surprisingly candid, with Iger not beating around the bush at any moment. He discusses with minimal secrecy the security measures of a potential Walt Disney World terrorist attack. He talks at length about the muddled reputation Roy E. Disney carried, marred by a rosy public-facing image the company projected. He openly shares the exit of former CEO Michael Eisner, a tale Iger claims was partially falsely reported in the widespread book Disney War<\/em>. He's very direct in discussing the flaws of his present and prior colleagues and supervisors, again pointing those attributes back to a value the person did or didn't exemplify in an attempt to illustrate a point to the reader.\n\nAt the same time, though, he's always fair (or, at least, appears to be, having no way to verify without knowing the subjects personally). Just as directly as he calls out weaknesses, he acknowledges his own mistakes too, and he equally takes time to build upon others' strengths. His extensive sharing about the friendship he shared with Steve Jobs is particularly touching and revelatory. It's within this realm that the true merit of Iger's book is found, at least for the Disney fan: Here we find stories we've never heard this side of before (deleted scenes, if you will), events that we've only previously known through the lens of facts-only news articles or misconstrued rumors. Here, from the direct source, we have missing moments from Disney history suddenly and delightfully revealed in incredible detail.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nDisney usually waits a while to share its history. Though there's the usual fare of behind-the-scenes footage with each new home video release, these still feel relatively sugar-coated because the product is still new on the market. It's not until a project establishes itself as a time-tested classic (\/until there's no danger of it losing money) that we might hear the real<\/em> story of what went down \u2013\u2013 the hurdles, the obstacles, the production challenges, the difficult conversations, the creative disagreements. It wasn't until the Platinum Edition DVD collection began in 2001 that we really heard Disney share the full scope of production stories from its Renaissance-era films of the '90s. It's 2019 and we're just getting scraps of tales from the making of 2009's The Princess and the Frog<\/em> as its tenth-anniversary festivities set in motion. Likewise, Bob Iger has been CEO of The Walt Disney Company since 2005, and while we know the basics of what he's accomplished, we haven't really heard the full extent of these important moments in Disney history... (dramatic music) until now.\n\nWith Iger's reign largely anchoring on acquisitions of existing brands into the Disney fold, each of these purchases takes a significant portion of the book, beginning with Pixar and continuing with Marvel and Lucasfilm, and even touching on Fox at the end. We find out what Steve Jobs told Iger just 30 minutes before the Pixar purchase was announced that could have reversed the deal. We hear what convinced Marvel's prior owner to consider selling. We discover what happened behind the scenes with George Lucas during the production of The Force Awakens<\/em>. Iger's business acumen throughout keeps this prose from being overly gossipy \u2013\u2013 it always has a point, and (again, seemingly) always shares a fair perspective without being skewed or opinionated.\n\nFor a Disney fan, this reads as a soap opera with some sage advice sprinkled throughout. For those seeking a leadership-oriented book, this reads as an excellent delve into the mind of one of the world's most prominent leaders, offering helpful anecdotes guiding through his intricate thought processes. The \"life lessons\" aspect of the book might be a bit tangential at times, but this is forgiven by Iger's obvious passion for his career and his clear intent to make this book worthwhile for those who read it. Like his Twitter profile sometimes lets slip, Bob Iger loves what he does. And he equally loves sharing it. We have no choice but to stan.\n\n \n\nPurchase<\/a>","post_title":"[BOOK REVIEW] 'Ride of a Lifetime' is Disney CEO Bob Iger's Iconic Twitter Novelized","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"book-review-ride-of-a-lifetime-is-disney-ceo-bob-igers-iconic-twitter-novelized","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:30:57","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:30:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53709","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54423,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-09-23 14:53:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-09-23 21:53:43","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nWith official first day of fall \u2013\u2013 and now less than two months away from the release of Frozen 2 \u2013\u2013 Disney dropped a new trailer for the highly anticipated sequel.\n\nCheck it out!\n\n
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
Thoughts on the new characters? Who are you most excited to meet?<\/h2>","post_title":"New 'Frozen 2' Trailer Arrives Just in Time to Welcome Autumn","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"new-frozen-2-trailer-arrives-just-in-time-to-welcome-autumn","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-09-30 17:55:05","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-01 00:55:05","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53603","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"jnews_block_5"};
The thing is... Disney was right. They didn't just talk a big game. Frozen<\/em> was<\/strong> the greatest animated event since The Lion King<\/em>. How did they know? Clearly the studio was confident in the story. But they've released movies with great stories plenty of times that failed to gain traction with audiences. Could Disney identify the factors that made a long-term classic and not just a trendy moment, a passing fad? Could they see that these attributes, paired with a story they knew would connect with people, cemented Frozen<\/em>'s legacy as something that would withstand through the ages as much as the studio's greatest triumphs of yore? Somehow, whether because they've been around the block a few times and they know the signs of a hit ahead of a release, or because of sheer blind faith speaking success into existence, they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\nNow in retrospect, do you agree with what Disney predicted in 2013? Was Frozen the greatest Disney animated event since The Lion King? Do you believe we're still in the Disney Revival with Frozen 2? <\/em><\/h3>\n","post_title":"[FROZEMBER] The 'Frozen' Phenomenon","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozember-the-frozen-phenomenon","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-06 07:07:47","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-06 14:07:47","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53922","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54598,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-30 16:27:46","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-30 23:27:46","post_content":"The launch of Disney+ on November 12 is now less than two weeks away. Earlier today, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusives to the streaming platform.\n\nPixar IRL<\/strong><\/em> (or, \"in real life\") is a short-form series that will bring the beloved characters of Pixar to reality in the real world. If you're picturing live-action remakes, you'd be mistaken. These moments will be brought to life out and about among unsuspecting citizens, somewhat of a prank show turned on its head. Take a look.\n\n
Will you watch this new Pixar content?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Pixar Reveals Line-Up of Original Programming for Disney+","post_excerpt":"With the launch of Disney+ on November 12 now less than 2 weeks away, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusive to the streaming platform.","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"pixar-reveals-line-up-of-original-programming-for-disney","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-01 16:56:54","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-01 23:56:54","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54596,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-28 17:46:58","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:46:58","post_content":"Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>swept the globe by storm earlier this year<\/a> and recently arrived on home video<\/a>. The film re-sparked a multitude of emotions and conversations<\/a> in its audiences as love poured out once more for arguably Pixar's most beloved franchise. Toy Story <\/em>is special, not only for the milestones it represents as Pixar's first feature and the world's first full-length computer-animated film, but also for what its themes and characters mean to its now multiple generations of viewers. Among the most prominent of observable narratives is Woody's, a character whose motivations, flaws, and changes become more complex with each passing Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>volume, whose arc is fascinating to study.\n\nMany, myself included, questioned if\u00a0Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>was necessary when it was first announced<\/a> in 2015. Toy Story 3, <\/em>released in 2010, felt like such a perfect finale, and within the context of its predecessors, allowed the whole series to function as an admirable trilogy. In nearly every category, Toy Story 3\u00a0<\/em>feels inherently like a bookend. Its opening fantasy sequence calls back the opening of Toy Story<\/em> with Andy's playtime. Its final shot (the iconic blue sky and fluffy clouds) is the first film's first shot. It has the cinematic mechanics of a perfect ending. If\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> was going to prove itself worthy, it needed to do that same legwork. As we're about to explore, it does.\n\n
\n
The Golden Rule of Pixar Sequels<\/h2>\nPixar's justification for sequels is relayed in Charles Solomon's book The Toy Story Films: An Animated Journey<\/em> (published in 2012, before Toy Story 4<\/em> was conceived). Solomon shares how Pixar filmmakers always want a sequel to feel as if it's truly the next chapter of a bigger story that the animators were trying to tell all along. A Pixar sequel should feel as if the story of the series is mapped out from the beginning, even though it isn't.\n\nThat goal works a charm in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a simple move from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> laying out a vital foundation for what was to follow, even if it didn't realize it at the time. Bo Peep was excluded from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, with director Lee Unkrich sharing in the film's bonus material that, as great of a character as she was, it didn't make sense that she would still be in the picture after all those years. Firstly, she was a lamp fixture, not a toy, but more importantly, she never belonged to Andy. She always belonged to his sister, Molly, and it didn't service the story for Andy to have kept her with his other toys as he grew up. Unkrich did state that one of his regrets of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was not featuring Bo in the opening fantasy scene, though perhaps her exclusion here was unknowingly necessary for her re-introduction in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> to pack the punch that it does.\n\n
\n\nUpon seeing\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a friend, he remarked, \"Wow, they really planned all that out well. Not having Bo Peep in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was so smart with what they wanted to do with her in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>.\" And therein I realized that Pixar had achieved its own gold standard:\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> felt like a strategic chapter in a grander story, and therefore had<\/em> to happen to complete the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>narrative.\n\nGetting back to Woody, though, the change that occurs through him in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> is reflected through language. It is the language more than anything that presents\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> as the bookend to\u00a0Toy Story<\/em>, with two key phrases coming to have new meaning: \"being there\" and \"lost toy.\"\n\n
\n
\"Being There\"<\/h2>\nIn\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> during the staff meeting, Woody declares that the toys' job \"isn't about being played with, it's about being there for Andy when he needs us.\" More than anything, that's Woody's priority, and he longs for everyone else to prioritize that, too. There's nothing wrong with that. That should<\/em> be his priority during that stage of his life. He's Andy's toy. Therefore, his job is to be there for Andy.\n\nThroughout\u00a0Toy Story 2<\/em>, this mantra remains the same. At the beginning of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, despite nearly a decade passing and Andy being a teenager about to leave for college, this is still Woody's priority, with that same language being used. In a similar staff meeting (albeit with much less toys, now that Andy is older), Woody echoes, \"This job isn't about being played with, it's about\u2014\" \"\u2014Being there for Andy. We know.\" Jessie interrupts him, clearly having heard this speech before. Woody, perhaps naively, still longs with everything inside of him to be there for Andy.\n\n
\n\nAt the end of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, this phrase and that language comes to have completely new meaning for Woody, as scriptwriter Michael Arndt shares in the book The Art of Toy Story 3<\/em>. Arndt takes us back to that moment: Woody inside Andy's college box, ready to leave the other toys behind. As Andy prepares to say goodbye to his childhood bedroom, his mother steps into the room and becomes emotional at the sight of the room packed up and empty, the ghost of her son's formative years vanished. Andy embraces her, and she implores, \"I just wish I could always be with you.\" Andy replies, \"You will be.\" In that instant, Woody makes a revelation. His entire purpose shifts. Andy's mom will always \"be there\" for Andy, even if she's not physically in the same space as him. And therefore, so can Woody. He doesn't have to go to college with Andy to be there for Andy. This is what drives Woody to switch boxes and go to Bonnie's with the rest of the toys. This life-changing choice is gloriously affirmed for Woody in a way he never thought possible: hearing it directly from Andy himself. As Andy gives Woody to Bonnie, he shares, \"Woody has been my pal for as long as I can remember. He's brave, like a cowboy should be. And kind and smart. But the thing that makes Woody special is he'll never give up on you, ever. He'll be there<\/em> for you, no matter what.\" Andy moves on. And therefore, so can Woody.\n\nOr, so we think. From that point forward, Woody's purpose changes, as he states to Forky in Toy Story 4<\/em>: his job is to \"be there for Bonnie.\" However, his change of ownership is still something Woody is getting used to. He hasn't quite moved on from Andy, even slipping in his explanation to Forky by using Andy's name first before correcting himself. Even though Woody made a huge decision, he's having a hard time accepting the reality of change around him. This is understandable and even expected, given the strong connection Andy and Woody had.\n\nWoody was there for Andy. Now it's his job to be there for Bonnie. But does that make sense? This is the question Woody berates himself for even thinking. It's all but blasphemy to his worldview to wonder if his loyalty to his kid is anything less than permanent. We'll explore how he confronts that internal dialogue a bit later.\n\n
\n
\"Lost Toy\"<\/h2>\nThe other consistent, repeated dialogue that gives us a lot of insight toward Woody's arc is the idea of being a \"lost toy.\" Beginning in\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> and continuing forward, this is the language used to describe a toy misplaced by their owner, and thus doomed to an eternity of unfulfilled purpose, of empty desire. As Andy's mom drives away from the gas station and Woody and Buzz are left at the pump, Woody cries in despair, \"I'm lost! Oh, I'm a lost toy!\" This is his greatest fear. This is his nightmare realized.\n\nIn\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, though, this concept is turned on its head. Bo Peep shows Woody a very different perspective of the idea of a lost toy. For her, being a lost toy is not a woeful product of circumstance, it's a choice she's made \u2014 and that she's proud of.\n\nBo Peep learned that her purpose wasn't as narrow of a concept as she once believed. As \"The Nerdwriter\" observed in a recent YouTube video<\/a>, even\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>'s cinematography tries to send us messages about Woody's worldview in contrast to Bo's newfound perspective. In back-to-back cuts within the same scene, an angle focusing on Bo Peep has a bokeh, blurred background, while the same moment angled toward Woody has a stark, in-focus background, symbolizing her openness to organic decisions and embracing change as opposed to his more plan-oriented, rigid mindset at that point in the story.\n\n
\n\nThat's not to say that Woody is completely static in the first three films. In many ways, he's changed quite a lot. He's grown. For starters, in\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>he does everything in his power to be his kid's favorite toy at all costs, even if it means throwing a new favorite toy out of a window. In Toy Story 4<\/em>, he does everything to protect his kid's new favorite toy, even if it's not him and even if it means throwing himself<\/em> out of a window. Woody has learned to be selfless. He doesn't get it right all the time, but his primary motivation is meeting the needs of others rather than himself. That will be key later.\n\nIn Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody feels a pull (a call, some might even say) toward something different, but because this contradicts so fundamentally with everything he's believed for his entire life, he has difficulty 1.) acknowledging that the thought is something he even has, and 2.) moving forward toward taking action on it.\n\n
\n
Woody Leaves<\/h2>\nUltimately, Woody decides to leave Bonnie's toys \u2014 his family \u2014 to be with Bo Peep and help carnival toys get adopted by kids... In essence, to be a lost toy. What was once his greatest crisis is where he finds his fulfilled purpose. That purpose has transitioned from \"being there for Andy\" to \"being there for his kid\" to finally \"being there for all kids.\" This fluidity of his life's pursuit shows tremendous growth in Woody as an individual and as a character in a way that is instantly applicable in considering what each of us devotes our lives toward achieving.\n\nIt's easy to disqualify Woody's decision. It's understandable and even logical to at first claim it's unwise. Leaving a child to live a life of your own was villainized in Toy Story 2. <\/em>Wasn't the point of that movie was Woody learned NOT to run away from his kid? Woody was pitted as unreasonable when he wanted to leave the other toys to go to college in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>. Wasn't the take-away there, as sung in the Oscar-winning end-credits song, that \"we belong together\"?\n\nThe difference in those circumstances, though, is that in both cases Woody would've been running toward an empty life by abandoning his kid. The museum in Japan. A box in Andy's dorm room. The common factor in both scenarios is an earnestness to choose the path that leads toward meeting someone else's needs vs. satisfying his own. As much as Woody might wish Bonnie needed him, she simply doesn't anymore. She's all but discarded him. Lotso hints at it toward the climax of Toy Story 3<\/em> and Forky brings it to the forefront in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>: truth is in the eye of the beholder, and that means toys and trash might be interchangeable depending on which judge is making the verdict. To Bonnie, Woody has, sadly, become trash. Staying with her serves no purpose. It would be selfish in comparison to the opportunity of his other decision.\n\n
\n\nHere's where we surprisingly find immense value in a place I'd never expect it to be: the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>short films and television specials released 2011-2014. This collection of short-form content brought us some fun diversions in the moment, but ultimately didn't change anything major within the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>universe. Now, though, this extra media shows us something very important: Bonnie, once, truly loved Woody. This is fascinating.\n\nIf we pay close attention to the seasons within these mini-sequels, we notice two separate winter breaks for Bonnie. If\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> concluded at the beginning of a school year, there are two winters during the shorts, and\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> begins at the advent of another new school year, we can assume that the time elapsed between\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>3\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>4<\/em> is at least two years, at a minimum. This puts some longevity on what, to a viewer watching just the feature films consecutively, might seem to be hardly any passage of time.\n\nWhat's more, if the viewer makes the jump from Toy Story 3<\/em> immediately into\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody isn't really shown as being loved by Bonnie. Sure, we get the sequence when she inadvertently takes him home from Sunnyside for playtime in Toy Story 3<\/em>, but that was before we knew he would be her toy at the end. Yes, she plays with him briefly in the opening montage of\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, but quickly in the next scene she chooses to leave him in her closet.\n\nBut in the shorts and TV specials, we see her treating him as equal as any other toy. She brings him when she goes over to friends' houses. She takes him on car trips. She loves him. It's this love that's absent if we skip quickly from Toy Story 3<\/em> to\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Bonnie completely devalued what Andy told her when he gave her Woody. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Woody's torn decision to go with Bo or stay with Bonnie is based only on a misguided concept of loyalty rather than any substantial relationship.\n\n
\n\nSo Woody leaves. Finally, after years of processing who he is, why he's here, and where he belongs in this world, he acknowledges and accepts something he's never been able to before: that the answers to those questions change as time passes. There isn't one concrete definition for who a person is. Life is more fluid than that. And having made his decision and said goodbye to the toys who have been his family for decades, Woody moves on. As Bonnie's family's RV pulls away and Buzz and Woody share one last look, a familiar riff of music inhabits Randy Newman's score \u2014 the exact same cue that played when Woody appeared onscreen for the very first time in 1995. It seems this is a bookend, after all.","post_title":"[OPINION] Woody \u2014 The Character Arc of Pixar's Most Iconic Hero","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"opinion-woody-the-character-arc-of-pixars-most-iconic-hero","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-31 14:19:33","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-31 21:19:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53532","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54529,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-21 14:37:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-21 21:37:43","post_content":"It's been no secret, even from the first teaser last winter, that Frozen 2<\/em> <\/strong>will be epic. If nothing else, the Roman numerals in all the marketing let us know this is going to be a classy affair.\n\nFour new posters released from Disney today continue to highlight the adventurous scope and impressive scale of the sequel, hinting at perhaps a darker, more intricate tale than its predecessor.\n\nOne thing is for sure: WE. CAN'T. WAIT.\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThere's just one month left until Frozen 2 <\/em>debuts in theaters November 22, 2019, directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.\n
Which of these new posters is your favorite?<\/h2>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"'Frozen 2' Character Posters Foreshadow Epic Scale","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozen-2-character-posters-foreshadow-epic-scale","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:52:40","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:52:40","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53826","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54520,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-10 19:17:53","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-11 02:17:53","post_content":"\"In times of old, the world was full of wonder and magic, but times change.\"\n\nThese words herald the arrival of Pixar's newest film,\u00a0Onward<\/em><\/strong>, in theaters March 6th, 2020, from director Dan Scanlon (Monsters University<\/em>). The movie stars Chris Pratt and Tom Holland as elf brothers, living in an enchanted realm like the kind we'd typically see in a medieval story but brought forward into the present day. Check out the full trailer below!\n\n
What was your favorite moment from the Onward<\/em> trailer?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Trailer Premiereth for Pixar's 'Onward' Starring Chris Pratt and Tom Holland","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trailer-premiereth-for-pixars-onward-starring-chris-pratt-and-tom-holland","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:38:13","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:38:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53741","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54517,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-07 20:01:55","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-08 03:01:55","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nI'm a Bob Iger stan. Or, at least, I'm a Bob Iger Twitter stan.\n\nI can't help it. Getting push notifications for his tweets is like Christmas morning each time he takes to the Internet. Posts typically arrive with Iger giddy about a new project, sometimes becoming confused with the subtleties of Twitter. One time he posted about Lucasfilm head Kathy Kennedy and mistakenly tagged a Kennedy parody account. This year on the anniversary of his being named Disney CEO, he tweeted about himself in the third person. Sometimes \u2013\u2013 these are my personal favorite \u2013\u2013 he'll chime in on Disney rumors or criticism with sarcasm, such as when he rebuked Captain Marvel<\/em> naysayers by claiming Disney would build \"a Captain Marvel<\/em> land with 50 Captain Marvel<\/em> attractions, plus Captain Marvel<\/em> cruise ships, hotels, and parades.\" HE. IS. WORTH. THE. FOLLOW. GO. FOLLOW. HIM.\n\nAnyway, these remarks (both in tone and in typo errors) feel out of place for the otherwise professional, businesslike stance Iger takes nearly everywhere else he publicly communicates. For the leader of a major corporation, Iger's tweets humanize him and remind us that he's a real person with, apparently, quite an offbeat personality that doesn't often come across in interviews. The same revelatory experience is found in Iger's new book, The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of The Walt Disney Company. <\/em>Curiously published from Random House rather than Disney Editions, the book pairs legends from his Disney tenure with practical leadership advice. This goes all the way back to 1974, when Iger began his first job with ABC. Many times throughout the book, Iger writes directly to the reader with wisdom relating not just to the business world, but to professional relationships, work\/life balance, friendships in the workplace, and other topics. The purpose is clearly to impart wisdom from major career moments rather than be a biography, and the extrapolation of proverbial business lessons is a large part of the narrative here.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThe book reads as surprisingly candid, with Iger not beating around the bush at any moment. He discusses with minimal secrecy the security measures of a potential Walt Disney World terrorist attack. He talks at length about the muddled reputation Roy E. Disney carried, marred by a rosy public-facing image the company projected. He openly shares the exit of former CEO Michael Eisner, a tale Iger claims was partially falsely reported in the widespread book Disney War<\/em>. He's very direct in discussing the flaws of his present and prior colleagues and supervisors, again pointing those attributes back to a value the person did or didn't exemplify in an attempt to illustrate a point to the reader.\n\nAt the same time, though, he's always fair (or, at least, appears to be, having no way to verify without knowing the subjects personally). Just as directly as he calls out weaknesses, he acknowledges his own mistakes too, and he equally takes time to build upon others' strengths. His extensive sharing about the friendship he shared with Steve Jobs is particularly touching and revelatory. It's within this realm that the true merit of Iger's book is found, at least for the Disney fan: Here we find stories we've never heard this side of before (deleted scenes, if you will), events that we've only previously known through the lens of facts-only news articles or misconstrued rumors. Here, from the direct source, we have missing moments from Disney history suddenly and delightfully revealed in incredible detail.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nDisney usually waits a while to share its history. Though there's the usual fare of behind-the-scenes footage with each new home video release, these still feel relatively sugar-coated because the product is still new on the market. It's not until a project establishes itself as a time-tested classic (\/until there's no danger of it losing money) that we might hear the real<\/em> story of what went down \u2013\u2013 the hurdles, the obstacles, the production challenges, the difficult conversations, the creative disagreements. It wasn't until the Platinum Edition DVD collection began in 2001 that we really heard Disney share the full scope of production stories from its Renaissance-era films of the '90s. It's 2019 and we're just getting scraps of tales from the making of 2009's The Princess and the Frog<\/em> as its tenth-anniversary festivities set in motion. Likewise, Bob Iger has been CEO of The Walt Disney Company since 2005, and while we know the basics of what he's accomplished, we haven't really heard the full extent of these important moments in Disney history... (dramatic music) until now.\n\nWith Iger's reign largely anchoring on acquisitions of existing brands into the Disney fold, each of these purchases takes a significant portion of the book, beginning with Pixar and continuing with Marvel and Lucasfilm, and even touching on Fox at the end. We find out what Steve Jobs told Iger just 30 minutes before the Pixar purchase was announced that could have reversed the deal. We hear what convinced Marvel's prior owner to consider selling. We discover what happened behind the scenes with George Lucas during the production of The Force Awakens<\/em>. Iger's business acumen throughout keeps this prose from being overly gossipy \u2013\u2013 it always has a point, and (again, seemingly) always shares a fair perspective without being skewed or opinionated.\n\nFor a Disney fan, this reads as a soap opera with some sage advice sprinkled throughout. For those seeking a leadership-oriented book, this reads as an excellent delve into the mind of one of the world's most prominent leaders, offering helpful anecdotes guiding through his intricate thought processes. The \"life lessons\" aspect of the book might be a bit tangential at times, but this is forgiven by Iger's obvious passion for his career and his clear intent to make this book worthwhile for those who read it. Like his Twitter profile sometimes lets slip, Bob Iger loves what he does. And he equally loves sharing it. We have no choice but to stan.\n\n \n\nPurchase<\/a>","post_title":"[BOOK REVIEW] 'Ride of a Lifetime' is Disney CEO Bob Iger's Iconic Twitter Novelized","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"book-review-ride-of-a-lifetime-is-disney-ceo-bob-igers-iconic-twitter-novelized","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:30:57","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:30:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53709","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54423,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-09-23 14:53:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-09-23 21:53:43","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nWith official first day of fall \u2013\u2013 and now less than two months away from the release of Frozen 2 \u2013\u2013 Disney dropped a new trailer for the highly anticipated sequel.\n\nCheck it out!\n\n
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
Thoughts on the new characters? Who are you most excited to meet?<\/h2>","post_title":"New 'Frozen 2' Trailer Arrives Just in Time to Welcome Autumn","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"new-frozen-2-trailer-arrives-just-in-time-to-welcome-autumn","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-09-30 17:55:05","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-01 00:55:05","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53603","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"jnews_block_5"};
The thing is... Disney was right. They didn't just talk a big game. Frozen<\/em> was<\/strong> the greatest animated event since The Lion King<\/em>. How did they know? Clearly the studio was confident in the story. But they've released movies with great stories plenty of times that failed to gain traction with audiences. Could Disney identify the factors that made a long-term classic and not just a trendy moment, a passing fad? Could they see that these attributes, paired with a story they knew would connect with people, cemented Frozen<\/em>'s legacy as something that would withstand through the ages as much as the studio's greatest triumphs of yore? Somehow, whether because they've been around the block a few times and they know the signs of a hit ahead of a release, or because of sheer blind faith speaking success into existence, they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\nNow in retrospect, do you agree with what Disney predicted in 2013? Was Frozen the greatest Disney animated event since The Lion King? Do you believe we're still in the Disney Revival with Frozen 2? <\/em><\/h3>\n","post_title":"[FROZEMBER] The 'Frozen' Phenomenon","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozember-the-frozen-phenomenon","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-06 07:07:47","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-06 14:07:47","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53922","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54598,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-30 16:27:46","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-30 23:27:46","post_content":"The launch of Disney+ on November 12 is now less than two weeks away. Earlier today, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusives to the streaming platform.\n\nPixar IRL<\/strong><\/em> (or, \"in real life\") is a short-form series that will bring the beloved characters of Pixar to reality in the real world. If you're picturing live-action remakes, you'd be mistaken. These moments will be brought to life out and about among unsuspecting citizens, somewhat of a prank show turned on its head. Take a look.\n\n
Will you watch this new Pixar content?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Pixar Reveals Line-Up of Original Programming for Disney+","post_excerpt":"With the launch of Disney+ on November 12 now less than 2 weeks away, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusive to the streaming platform.","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"pixar-reveals-line-up-of-original-programming-for-disney","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-01 16:56:54","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-01 23:56:54","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54596,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-28 17:46:58","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:46:58","post_content":"Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>swept the globe by storm earlier this year<\/a> and recently arrived on home video<\/a>. The film re-sparked a multitude of emotions and conversations<\/a> in its audiences as love poured out once more for arguably Pixar's most beloved franchise. Toy Story <\/em>is special, not only for the milestones it represents as Pixar's first feature and the world's first full-length computer-animated film, but also for what its themes and characters mean to its now multiple generations of viewers. Among the most prominent of observable narratives is Woody's, a character whose motivations, flaws, and changes become more complex with each passing Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>volume, whose arc is fascinating to study.\n\nMany, myself included, questioned if\u00a0Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>was necessary when it was first announced<\/a> in 2015. Toy Story 3, <\/em>released in 2010, felt like such a perfect finale, and within the context of its predecessors, allowed the whole series to function as an admirable trilogy. In nearly every category, Toy Story 3\u00a0<\/em>feels inherently like a bookend. Its opening fantasy sequence calls back the opening of Toy Story<\/em> with Andy's playtime. Its final shot (the iconic blue sky and fluffy clouds) is the first film's first shot. It has the cinematic mechanics of a perfect ending. If\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> was going to prove itself worthy, it needed to do that same legwork. As we're about to explore, it does.\n\n
\n
The Golden Rule of Pixar Sequels<\/h2>\nPixar's justification for sequels is relayed in Charles Solomon's book The Toy Story Films: An Animated Journey<\/em> (published in 2012, before Toy Story 4<\/em> was conceived). Solomon shares how Pixar filmmakers always want a sequel to feel as if it's truly the next chapter of a bigger story that the animators were trying to tell all along. A Pixar sequel should feel as if the story of the series is mapped out from the beginning, even though it isn't.\n\nThat goal works a charm in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a simple move from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> laying out a vital foundation for what was to follow, even if it didn't realize it at the time. Bo Peep was excluded from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, with director Lee Unkrich sharing in the film's bonus material that, as great of a character as she was, it didn't make sense that she would still be in the picture after all those years. Firstly, she was a lamp fixture, not a toy, but more importantly, she never belonged to Andy. She always belonged to his sister, Molly, and it didn't service the story for Andy to have kept her with his other toys as he grew up. Unkrich did state that one of his regrets of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was not featuring Bo in the opening fantasy scene, though perhaps her exclusion here was unknowingly necessary for her re-introduction in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> to pack the punch that it does.\n\n
\n\nUpon seeing\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a friend, he remarked, \"Wow, they really planned all that out well. Not having Bo Peep in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was so smart with what they wanted to do with her in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>.\" And therein I realized that Pixar had achieved its own gold standard:\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> felt like a strategic chapter in a grander story, and therefore had<\/em> to happen to complete the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>narrative.\n\nGetting back to Woody, though, the change that occurs through him in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> is reflected through language. It is the language more than anything that presents\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> as the bookend to\u00a0Toy Story<\/em>, with two key phrases coming to have new meaning: \"being there\" and \"lost toy.\"\n\n
\n
\"Being There\"<\/h2>\nIn\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> during the staff meeting, Woody declares that the toys' job \"isn't about being played with, it's about being there for Andy when he needs us.\" More than anything, that's Woody's priority, and he longs for everyone else to prioritize that, too. There's nothing wrong with that. That should<\/em> be his priority during that stage of his life. He's Andy's toy. Therefore, his job is to be there for Andy.\n\nThroughout\u00a0Toy Story 2<\/em>, this mantra remains the same. At the beginning of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, despite nearly a decade passing and Andy being a teenager about to leave for college, this is still Woody's priority, with that same language being used. In a similar staff meeting (albeit with much less toys, now that Andy is older), Woody echoes, \"This job isn't about being played with, it's about\u2014\" \"\u2014Being there for Andy. We know.\" Jessie interrupts him, clearly having heard this speech before. Woody, perhaps naively, still longs with everything inside of him to be there for Andy.\n\n
\n\nAt the end of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, this phrase and that language comes to have completely new meaning for Woody, as scriptwriter Michael Arndt shares in the book The Art of Toy Story 3<\/em>. Arndt takes us back to that moment: Woody inside Andy's college box, ready to leave the other toys behind. As Andy prepares to say goodbye to his childhood bedroom, his mother steps into the room and becomes emotional at the sight of the room packed up and empty, the ghost of her son's formative years vanished. Andy embraces her, and she implores, \"I just wish I could always be with you.\" Andy replies, \"You will be.\" In that instant, Woody makes a revelation. His entire purpose shifts. Andy's mom will always \"be there\" for Andy, even if she's not physically in the same space as him. And therefore, so can Woody. He doesn't have to go to college with Andy to be there for Andy. This is what drives Woody to switch boxes and go to Bonnie's with the rest of the toys. This life-changing choice is gloriously affirmed for Woody in a way he never thought possible: hearing it directly from Andy himself. As Andy gives Woody to Bonnie, he shares, \"Woody has been my pal for as long as I can remember. He's brave, like a cowboy should be. And kind and smart. But the thing that makes Woody special is he'll never give up on you, ever. He'll be there<\/em> for you, no matter what.\" Andy moves on. And therefore, so can Woody.\n\nOr, so we think. From that point forward, Woody's purpose changes, as he states to Forky in Toy Story 4<\/em>: his job is to \"be there for Bonnie.\" However, his change of ownership is still something Woody is getting used to. He hasn't quite moved on from Andy, even slipping in his explanation to Forky by using Andy's name first before correcting himself. Even though Woody made a huge decision, he's having a hard time accepting the reality of change around him. This is understandable and even expected, given the strong connection Andy and Woody had.\n\nWoody was there for Andy. Now it's his job to be there for Bonnie. But does that make sense? This is the question Woody berates himself for even thinking. It's all but blasphemy to his worldview to wonder if his loyalty to his kid is anything less than permanent. We'll explore how he confronts that internal dialogue a bit later.\n\n
\n
\"Lost Toy\"<\/h2>\nThe other consistent, repeated dialogue that gives us a lot of insight toward Woody's arc is the idea of being a \"lost toy.\" Beginning in\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> and continuing forward, this is the language used to describe a toy misplaced by their owner, and thus doomed to an eternity of unfulfilled purpose, of empty desire. As Andy's mom drives away from the gas station and Woody and Buzz are left at the pump, Woody cries in despair, \"I'm lost! Oh, I'm a lost toy!\" This is his greatest fear. This is his nightmare realized.\n\nIn\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, though, this concept is turned on its head. Bo Peep shows Woody a very different perspective of the idea of a lost toy. For her, being a lost toy is not a woeful product of circumstance, it's a choice she's made \u2014 and that she's proud of.\n\nBo Peep learned that her purpose wasn't as narrow of a concept as she once believed. As \"The Nerdwriter\" observed in a recent YouTube video<\/a>, even\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>'s cinematography tries to send us messages about Woody's worldview in contrast to Bo's newfound perspective. In back-to-back cuts within the same scene, an angle focusing on Bo Peep has a bokeh, blurred background, while the same moment angled toward Woody has a stark, in-focus background, symbolizing her openness to organic decisions and embracing change as opposed to his more plan-oriented, rigid mindset at that point in the story.\n\n
\n\nThat's not to say that Woody is completely static in the first three films. In many ways, he's changed quite a lot. He's grown. For starters, in\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>he does everything in his power to be his kid's favorite toy at all costs, even if it means throwing a new favorite toy out of a window. In Toy Story 4<\/em>, he does everything to protect his kid's new favorite toy, even if it's not him and even if it means throwing himself<\/em> out of a window. Woody has learned to be selfless. He doesn't get it right all the time, but his primary motivation is meeting the needs of others rather than himself. That will be key later.\n\nIn Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody feels a pull (a call, some might even say) toward something different, but because this contradicts so fundamentally with everything he's believed for his entire life, he has difficulty 1.) acknowledging that the thought is something he even has, and 2.) moving forward toward taking action on it.\n\n
\n
Woody Leaves<\/h2>\nUltimately, Woody decides to leave Bonnie's toys \u2014 his family \u2014 to be with Bo Peep and help carnival toys get adopted by kids... In essence, to be a lost toy. What was once his greatest crisis is where he finds his fulfilled purpose. That purpose has transitioned from \"being there for Andy\" to \"being there for his kid\" to finally \"being there for all kids.\" This fluidity of his life's pursuit shows tremendous growth in Woody as an individual and as a character in a way that is instantly applicable in considering what each of us devotes our lives toward achieving.\n\nIt's easy to disqualify Woody's decision. It's understandable and even logical to at first claim it's unwise. Leaving a child to live a life of your own was villainized in Toy Story 2. <\/em>Wasn't the point of that movie was Woody learned NOT to run away from his kid? Woody was pitted as unreasonable when he wanted to leave the other toys to go to college in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>. Wasn't the take-away there, as sung in the Oscar-winning end-credits song, that \"we belong together\"?\n\nThe difference in those circumstances, though, is that in both cases Woody would've been running toward an empty life by abandoning his kid. The museum in Japan. A box in Andy's dorm room. The common factor in both scenarios is an earnestness to choose the path that leads toward meeting someone else's needs vs. satisfying his own. As much as Woody might wish Bonnie needed him, she simply doesn't anymore. She's all but discarded him. Lotso hints at it toward the climax of Toy Story 3<\/em> and Forky brings it to the forefront in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>: truth is in the eye of the beholder, and that means toys and trash might be interchangeable depending on which judge is making the verdict. To Bonnie, Woody has, sadly, become trash. Staying with her serves no purpose. It would be selfish in comparison to the opportunity of his other decision.\n\n
\n\nHere's where we surprisingly find immense value in a place I'd never expect it to be: the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>short films and television specials released 2011-2014. This collection of short-form content brought us some fun diversions in the moment, but ultimately didn't change anything major within the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>universe. Now, though, this extra media shows us something very important: Bonnie, once, truly loved Woody. This is fascinating.\n\nIf we pay close attention to the seasons within these mini-sequels, we notice two separate winter breaks for Bonnie. If\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> concluded at the beginning of a school year, there are two winters during the shorts, and\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> begins at the advent of another new school year, we can assume that the time elapsed between\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>3\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>4<\/em> is at least two years, at a minimum. This puts some longevity on what, to a viewer watching just the feature films consecutively, might seem to be hardly any passage of time.\n\nWhat's more, if the viewer makes the jump from Toy Story 3<\/em> immediately into\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody isn't really shown as being loved by Bonnie. Sure, we get the sequence when she inadvertently takes him home from Sunnyside for playtime in Toy Story 3<\/em>, but that was before we knew he would be her toy at the end. Yes, she plays with him briefly in the opening montage of\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, but quickly in the next scene she chooses to leave him in her closet.\n\nBut in the shorts and TV specials, we see her treating him as equal as any other toy. She brings him when she goes over to friends' houses. She takes him on car trips. She loves him. It's this love that's absent if we skip quickly from Toy Story 3<\/em> to\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Bonnie completely devalued what Andy told her when he gave her Woody. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Woody's torn decision to go with Bo or stay with Bonnie is based only on a misguided concept of loyalty rather than any substantial relationship.\n\n
\n\nSo Woody leaves. Finally, after years of processing who he is, why he's here, and where he belongs in this world, he acknowledges and accepts something he's never been able to before: that the answers to those questions change as time passes. There isn't one concrete definition for who a person is. Life is more fluid than that. And having made his decision and said goodbye to the toys who have been his family for decades, Woody moves on. As Bonnie's family's RV pulls away and Buzz and Woody share one last look, a familiar riff of music inhabits Randy Newman's score \u2014 the exact same cue that played when Woody appeared onscreen for the very first time in 1995. It seems this is a bookend, after all.","post_title":"[OPINION] Woody \u2014 The Character Arc of Pixar's Most Iconic Hero","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"opinion-woody-the-character-arc-of-pixars-most-iconic-hero","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-31 14:19:33","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-31 21:19:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53532","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54529,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-21 14:37:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-21 21:37:43","post_content":"It's been no secret, even from the first teaser last winter, that Frozen 2<\/em> <\/strong>will be epic. If nothing else, the Roman numerals in all the marketing let us know this is going to be a classy affair.\n\nFour new posters released from Disney today continue to highlight the adventurous scope and impressive scale of the sequel, hinting at perhaps a darker, more intricate tale than its predecessor.\n\nOne thing is for sure: WE. CAN'T. WAIT.\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThere's just one month left until Frozen 2 <\/em>debuts in theaters November 22, 2019, directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.\n
Which of these new posters is your favorite?<\/h2>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"'Frozen 2' Character Posters Foreshadow Epic Scale","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozen-2-character-posters-foreshadow-epic-scale","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:52:40","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:52:40","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53826","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54520,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-10 19:17:53","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-11 02:17:53","post_content":"\"In times of old, the world was full of wonder and magic, but times change.\"\n\nThese words herald the arrival of Pixar's newest film,\u00a0Onward<\/em><\/strong>, in theaters March 6th, 2020, from director Dan Scanlon (Monsters University<\/em>). The movie stars Chris Pratt and Tom Holland as elf brothers, living in an enchanted realm like the kind we'd typically see in a medieval story but brought forward into the present day. Check out the full trailer below!\n\n
What was your favorite moment from the Onward<\/em> trailer?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Trailer Premiereth for Pixar's 'Onward' Starring Chris Pratt and Tom Holland","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trailer-premiereth-for-pixars-onward-starring-chris-pratt-and-tom-holland","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:38:13","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:38:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53741","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54517,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-07 20:01:55","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-08 03:01:55","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nI'm a Bob Iger stan. Or, at least, I'm a Bob Iger Twitter stan.\n\nI can't help it. Getting push notifications for his tweets is like Christmas morning each time he takes to the Internet. Posts typically arrive with Iger giddy about a new project, sometimes becoming confused with the subtleties of Twitter. One time he posted about Lucasfilm head Kathy Kennedy and mistakenly tagged a Kennedy parody account. This year on the anniversary of his being named Disney CEO, he tweeted about himself in the third person. Sometimes \u2013\u2013 these are my personal favorite \u2013\u2013 he'll chime in on Disney rumors or criticism with sarcasm, such as when he rebuked Captain Marvel<\/em> naysayers by claiming Disney would build \"a Captain Marvel<\/em> land with 50 Captain Marvel<\/em> attractions, plus Captain Marvel<\/em> cruise ships, hotels, and parades.\" HE. IS. WORTH. THE. FOLLOW. GO. FOLLOW. HIM.\n\nAnyway, these remarks (both in tone and in typo errors) feel out of place for the otherwise professional, businesslike stance Iger takes nearly everywhere else he publicly communicates. For the leader of a major corporation, Iger's tweets humanize him and remind us that he's a real person with, apparently, quite an offbeat personality that doesn't often come across in interviews. The same revelatory experience is found in Iger's new book, The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of The Walt Disney Company. <\/em>Curiously published from Random House rather than Disney Editions, the book pairs legends from his Disney tenure with practical leadership advice. This goes all the way back to 1974, when Iger began his first job with ABC. Many times throughout the book, Iger writes directly to the reader with wisdom relating not just to the business world, but to professional relationships, work\/life balance, friendships in the workplace, and other topics. The purpose is clearly to impart wisdom from major career moments rather than be a biography, and the extrapolation of proverbial business lessons is a large part of the narrative here.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThe book reads as surprisingly candid, with Iger not beating around the bush at any moment. He discusses with minimal secrecy the security measures of a potential Walt Disney World terrorist attack. He talks at length about the muddled reputation Roy E. Disney carried, marred by a rosy public-facing image the company projected. He openly shares the exit of former CEO Michael Eisner, a tale Iger claims was partially falsely reported in the widespread book Disney War<\/em>. He's very direct in discussing the flaws of his present and prior colleagues and supervisors, again pointing those attributes back to a value the person did or didn't exemplify in an attempt to illustrate a point to the reader.\n\nAt the same time, though, he's always fair (or, at least, appears to be, having no way to verify without knowing the subjects personally). Just as directly as he calls out weaknesses, he acknowledges his own mistakes too, and he equally takes time to build upon others' strengths. His extensive sharing about the friendship he shared with Steve Jobs is particularly touching and revelatory. It's within this realm that the true merit of Iger's book is found, at least for the Disney fan: Here we find stories we've never heard this side of before (deleted scenes, if you will), events that we've only previously known through the lens of facts-only news articles or misconstrued rumors. Here, from the direct source, we have missing moments from Disney history suddenly and delightfully revealed in incredible detail.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nDisney usually waits a while to share its history. Though there's the usual fare of behind-the-scenes footage with each new home video release, these still feel relatively sugar-coated because the product is still new on the market. It's not until a project establishes itself as a time-tested classic (\/until there's no danger of it losing money) that we might hear the real<\/em> story of what went down \u2013\u2013 the hurdles, the obstacles, the production challenges, the difficult conversations, the creative disagreements. It wasn't until the Platinum Edition DVD collection began in 2001 that we really heard Disney share the full scope of production stories from its Renaissance-era films of the '90s. It's 2019 and we're just getting scraps of tales from the making of 2009's The Princess and the Frog<\/em> as its tenth-anniversary festivities set in motion. Likewise, Bob Iger has been CEO of The Walt Disney Company since 2005, and while we know the basics of what he's accomplished, we haven't really heard the full extent of these important moments in Disney history... (dramatic music) until now.\n\nWith Iger's reign largely anchoring on acquisitions of existing brands into the Disney fold, each of these purchases takes a significant portion of the book, beginning with Pixar and continuing with Marvel and Lucasfilm, and even touching on Fox at the end. We find out what Steve Jobs told Iger just 30 minutes before the Pixar purchase was announced that could have reversed the deal. We hear what convinced Marvel's prior owner to consider selling. We discover what happened behind the scenes with George Lucas during the production of The Force Awakens<\/em>. Iger's business acumen throughout keeps this prose from being overly gossipy \u2013\u2013 it always has a point, and (again, seemingly) always shares a fair perspective without being skewed or opinionated.\n\nFor a Disney fan, this reads as a soap opera with some sage advice sprinkled throughout. For those seeking a leadership-oriented book, this reads as an excellent delve into the mind of one of the world's most prominent leaders, offering helpful anecdotes guiding through his intricate thought processes. The \"life lessons\" aspect of the book might be a bit tangential at times, but this is forgiven by Iger's obvious passion for his career and his clear intent to make this book worthwhile for those who read it. Like his Twitter profile sometimes lets slip, Bob Iger loves what he does. And he equally loves sharing it. We have no choice but to stan.\n\n \n\nPurchase<\/a>","post_title":"[BOOK REVIEW] 'Ride of a Lifetime' is Disney CEO Bob Iger's Iconic Twitter Novelized","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"book-review-ride-of-a-lifetime-is-disney-ceo-bob-igers-iconic-twitter-novelized","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:30:57","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:30:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53709","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54423,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-09-23 14:53:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-09-23 21:53:43","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nWith official first day of fall \u2013\u2013 and now less than two months away from the release of Frozen 2 \u2013\u2013 Disney dropped a new trailer for the highly anticipated sequel.\n\nCheck it out!\n\n
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
Thoughts on the new characters? Who are you most excited to meet?<\/h2>","post_title":"New 'Frozen 2' Trailer Arrives Just in Time to Welcome Autumn","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"new-frozen-2-trailer-arrives-just-in-time-to-welcome-autumn","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-09-30 17:55:05","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-01 00:55:05","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53603","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"jnews_block_5"};
Then, in October 2013, came THAT trailer. This was it. This was the moment. This was when Disney told us loud and proud that Frozen<\/em> would be a force to be reckoned with. It didn't pretend to be something it wasn't. This was a Disney fairytale through and through, and it projected that clearly. As clips from the film swell into a grand arrangement of \"For the First Time In Forever\" (which was, incidentally, the first time anyone had heard the song), the trailer proclaimed that Frozen<\/em> would be \"The greatest Disney animated event since <\/strong>The Lion King<\/strong><\/em>.\"<\/strong> Woah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The thing is... Disney was right. They didn't just talk a big game. Frozen<\/em> was<\/strong> the greatest animated event since The Lion King<\/em>. How did they know? Clearly the studio was confident in the story. But they've released movies with great stories plenty of times that failed to gain traction with audiences. Could Disney identify the factors that made a long-term classic and not just a trendy moment, a passing fad? Could they see that these attributes, paired with a story they knew would connect with people, cemented Frozen<\/em>'s legacy as something that would withstand through the ages as much as the studio's greatest triumphs of yore? Somehow, whether because they've been around the block a few times and they know the signs of a hit ahead of a release, or because of sheer blind faith speaking success into existence, they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then, in October 2013, came THAT trailer. This was it. This was the moment. This was when Disney told us loud and proud that Frozen<\/em> would be a force to be reckoned with. It didn't pretend to be something it wasn't. This was a Disney fairytale through and through, and it projected that clearly. As clips from the film swell into a grand arrangement of \"For the First Time In Forever\" (which was, incidentally, the first time anyone had heard the song), the trailer proclaimed that Frozen<\/em> would be \"The greatest Disney animated event since <\/strong>The Lion King<\/strong><\/em>.\"<\/strong> Woah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The thing is... Disney was right. They didn't just talk a big game. Frozen<\/em> was<\/strong> the greatest animated event since The Lion King<\/em>. How did they know? Clearly the studio was confident in the story. But they've released movies with great stories plenty of times that failed to gain traction with audiences. Could Disney identify the factors that made a long-term classic and not just a trendy moment, a passing fad? Could they see that these attributes, paired with a story they knew would connect with people, cemented Frozen<\/em>'s legacy as something that would withstand through the ages as much as the studio's greatest triumphs of yore? Somehow, whether because they've been around the block a few times and they know the signs of a hit ahead of a release, or because of sheer blind faith speaking success into existence, they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then, in October 2013, came THAT trailer. This was it. This was the moment. This was when Disney told us loud and proud that Frozen<\/em> would be a force to be reckoned with. It didn't pretend to be something it wasn't. This was a Disney fairytale through and through, and it projected that clearly. As clips from the film swell into a grand arrangement of \"For the First Time In Forever\" (which was, incidentally, the first time anyone had heard the song), the trailer proclaimed that Frozen<\/em> would be \"The greatest Disney animated event since <\/strong>The Lion King<\/strong><\/em>.\"<\/strong> Woah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The thing is... Disney was right. They didn't just talk a big game. Frozen<\/em> was<\/strong> the greatest animated event since The Lion King<\/em>. How did they know? Clearly the studio was confident in the story. But they've released movies with great stories plenty of times that failed to gain traction with audiences. Could Disney identify the factors that made a long-term classic and not just a trendy moment, a passing fad? Could they see that these attributes, paired with a story they knew would connect with people, cemented Frozen<\/em>'s legacy as something that would withstand through the ages as much as the studio's greatest triumphs of yore? Somehow, whether because they've been around the block a few times and they know the signs of a hit ahead of a release, or because of sheer blind faith speaking success into existence, they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then came September and the first real trailer. This gave us clarity, but still shied away from embracing its true self. It pitched the film as a straightforward comedy, much like how Tangled<\/em> was marketed. (The comments in our post about that trailer<\/a> are similarly as fascinating as the teaser, but channeled with opposite emotions of pure joy.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then, in October 2013, came THAT trailer. This was it. This was the moment. This was when Disney told us loud and proud that Frozen<\/em> would be a force to be reckoned with. It didn't pretend to be something it wasn't. This was a Disney fairytale through and through, and it projected that clearly. As clips from the film swell into a grand arrangement of \"For the First Time In Forever\" (which was, incidentally, the first time anyone had heard the song), the trailer proclaimed that Frozen<\/em> would be \"The greatest Disney animated event since <\/strong>The Lion King<\/strong><\/em>.\"<\/strong> Woah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The thing is... Disney was right. They didn't just talk a big game. Frozen<\/em> was<\/strong> the greatest animated event since The Lion King<\/em>. How did they know? Clearly the studio was confident in the story. But they've released movies with great stories plenty of times that failed to gain traction with audiences. Could Disney identify the factors that made a long-term classic and not just a trendy moment, a passing fad? Could they see that these attributes, paired with a story they knew would connect with people, cemented Frozen<\/em>'s legacy as something that would withstand through the ages as much as the studio's greatest triumphs of yore? Somehow, whether because they've been around the block a few times and they know the signs of a hit ahead of a release, or because of sheer blind faith speaking success into existence, they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then came September and the first real trailer. This gave us clarity, but still shied away from embracing its true self. It pitched the film as a straightforward comedy, much like how Tangled<\/em> was marketed. (The comments in our post about that trailer<\/a> are similarly as fascinating as the teaser, but channeled with opposite emotions of pure joy.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then, in October 2013, came THAT trailer. This was it. This was the moment. This was when Disney told us loud and proud that Frozen<\/em> would be a force to be reckoned with. It didn't pretend to be something it wasn't. This was a Disney fairytale through and through, and it projected that clearly. As clips from the film swell into a grand arrangement of \"For the First Time In Forever\" (which was, incidentally, the first time anyone had heard the song), the trailer proclaimed that Frozen<\/em> would be \"The greatest Disney animated event since <\/strong>The Lion King<\/strong><\/em>.\"<\/strong> Woah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The thing is... Disney was right. They didn't just talk a big game. Frozen<\/em> was<\/strong> the greatest animated event since The Lion King<\/em>. How did they know? Clearly the studio was confident in the story. But they've released movies with great stories plenty of times that failed to gain traction with audiences. Could Disney identify the factors that made a long-term classic and not just a trendy moment, a passing fad? Could they see that these attributes, paired with a story they knew would connect with people, cemented Frozen<\/em>'s legacy as something that would withstand through the ages as much as the studio's greatest triumphs of yore? Somehow, whether because they've been around the block a few times and they know the signs of a hit ahead of a release, or because of sheer blind faith speaking success into existence, they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then came September and the first real trailer. This gave us clarity, but still shied away from embracing its true self. It pitched the film as a straightforward comedy, much like how Tangled<\/em> was marketed. (The comments in our post about that trailer<\/a> are similarly as fascinating as the teaser, but channeled with opposite emotions of pure joy.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then, in October 2013, came THAT trailer. This was it. This was the moment. This was when Disney told us loud and proud that Frozen<\/em> would be a force to be reckoned with. It didn't pretend to be something it wasn't. This was a Disney fairytale through and through, and it projected that clearly. As clips from the film swell into a grand arrangement of \"For the First Time In Forever\" (which was, incidentally, the first time anyone had heard the song), the trailer proclaimed that Frozen<\/em> would be \"The greatest Disney animated event since <\/strong>The Lion King<\/strong><\/em>.\"<\/strong> Woah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The thing is... Disney was right. They didn't just talk a big game. Frozen<\/em> was<\/strong> the greatest animated event since The Lion King<\/em>. How did they know? Clearly the studio was confident in the story. But they've released movies with great stories plenty of times that failed to gain traction with audiences. Could Disney identify the factors that made a long-term classic and not just a trendy moment, a passing fad? Could they see that these attributes, paired with a story they knew would connect with people, cemented Frozen<\/em>'s legacy as something that would withstand through the ages as much as the studio's greatest triumphs of yore? Somehow, whether because they've been around the block a few times and they know the signs of a hit ahead of a release, or because of sheer blind faith speaking success into existence, they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The teaser trailer for Frozen<\/em> debuted in June 2013, accompanying Monsters University <\/em>in theaters. It featured Olaf and Sven in a comical pantomime vignette, not unlike the classic Disney shorts of Walt's era that emphasized cartoony physical comedy. It was cute. But it was confusing. There was no hint at Frozen<\/em>'s scope. There was no mention of songs. There wasn't even an appearance by Anna or Elsa. The general public was left thinking Disney was about to bring them a cutesy film about a reindeer and a snowman. Animation fans in the know about the film's ambition were left wondering why Disney was why about sharing what Frozen<\/em> really was. (The comments in our post about the teaser<\/a> from 2013 are fascinating to look back on.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then came September and the first real trailer. This gave us clarity, but still shied away from embracing its true self. It pitched the film as a straightforward comedy, much like how Tangled<\/em> was marketed. (The comments in our post about that trailer<\/a> are similarly as fascinating as the teaser, but channeled with opposite emotions of pure joy.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then, in October 2013, came THAT trailer. This was it. This was the moment. This was when Disney told us loud and proud that Frozen<\/em> would be a force to be reckoned with. It didn't pretend to be something it wasn't. This was a Disney fairytale through and through, and it projected that clearly. As clips from the film swell into a grand arrangement of \"For the First Time In Forever\" (which was, incidentally, the first time anyone had heard the song), the trailer proclaimed that Frozen<\/em> would be \"The greatest Disney animated event since <\/strong>The Lion King<\/strong><\/em>.\"<\/strong> Woah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The thing is... Disney was right. They didn't just talk a big game. Frozen<\/em> was<\/strong> the greatest animated event since The Lion King<\/em>. How did they know? Clearly the studio was confident in the story. But they've released movies with great stories plenty of times that failed to gain traction with audiences. Could Disney identify the factors that made a long-term classic and not just a trendy moment, a passing fad? Could they see that these attributes, paired with a story they knew would connect with people, cemented Frozen<\/em>'s legacy as something that would withstand through the ages as much as the studio's greatest triumphs of yore? Somehow, whether because they've been around the block a few times and they know the signs of a hit ahead of a release, or because of sheer blind faith speaking success into existence, they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Now in retrospect, do you agree with what Disney predicted in 2013? Was Frozen the greatest Disney animated event since The Lion King? Do you believe we're still in the Disney Revival with Frozen 2? <\/em><\/h3>\n","post_title":"[FROZEMBER] The 'Frozen' Phenomenon","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozember-the-frozen-phenomenon","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-06 07:07:47","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-06 14:07:47","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53922","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54598,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-30 16:27:46","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-30 23:27:46","post_content":"The launch of Disney+ on November 12 is now less than two weeks away. Earlier today, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusives to the streaming platform.\n\nPixar IRL<\/strong><\/em> (or, \"in real life\") is a short-form series that will bring the beloved characters of Pixar to reality in the real world. If you're picturing live-action remakes, you'd be mistaken. These moments will be brought to life out and about among unsuspecting citizens, somewhat of a prank show turned on its head. Take a look.\n\n
Will you watch this new Pixar content?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Pixar Reveals Line-Up of Original Programming for Disney+","post_excerpt":"With the launch of Disney+ on November 12 now less than 2 weeks away, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusive to the streaming platform.","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"pixar-reveals-line-up-of-original-programming-for-disney","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-01 16:56:54","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-01 23:56:54","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54596,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-28 17:46:58","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:46:58","post_content":"Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>swept the globe by storm earlier this year<\/a> and recently arrived on home video<\/a>. The film re-sparked a multitude of emotions and conversations<\/a> in its audiences as love poured out once more for arguably Pixar's most beloved franchise. Toy Story <\/em>is special, not only for the milestones it represents as Pixar's first feature and the world's first full-length computer-animated film, but also for what its themes and characters mean to its now multiple generations of viewers. Among the most prominent of observable narratives is Woody's, a character whose motivations, flaws, and changes become more complex with each passing Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>volume, whose arc is fascinating to study.\n\nMany, myself included, questioned if\u00a0Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>was necessary when it was first announced<\/a> in 2015. Toy Story 3, <\/em>released in 2010, felt like such a perfect finale, and within the context of its predecessors, allowed the whole series to function as an admirable trilogy. In nearly every category, Toy Story 3\u00a0<\/em>feels inherently like a bookend. Its opening fantasy sequence calls back the opening of Toy Story<\/em> with Andy's playtime. Its final shot (the iconic blue sky and fluffy clouds) is the first film's first shot. It has the cinematic mechanics of a perfect ending. If\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> was going to prove itself worthy, it needed to do that same legwork. As we're about to explore, it does.\n\n
\n
The Golden Rule of Pixar Sequels<\/h2>\nPixar's justification for sequels is relayed in Charles Solomon's book The Toy Story Films: An Animated Journey<\/em> (published in 2012, before Toy Story 4<\/em> was conceived). Solomon shares how Pixar filmmakers always want a sequel to feel as if it's truly the next chapter of a bigger story that the animators were trying to tell all along. A Pixar sequel should feel as if the story of the series is mapped out from the beginning, even though it isn't.\n\nThat goal works a charm in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a simple move from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> laying out a vital foundation for what was to follow, even if it didn't realize it at the time. Bo Peep was excluded from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, with director Lee Unkrich sharing in the film's bonus material that, as great of a character as she was, it didn't make sense that she would still be in the picture after all those years. Firstly, she was a lamp fixture, not a toy, but more importantly, she never belonged to Andy. She always belonged to his sister, Molly, and it didn't service the story for Andy to have kept her with his other toys as he grew up. Unkrich did state that one of his regrets of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was not featuring Bo in the opening fantasy scene, though perhaps her exclusion here was unknowingly necessary for her re-introduction in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> to pack the punch that it does.\n\n
\n\nUpon seeing\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a friend, he remarked, \"Wow, they really planned all that out well. Not having Bo Peep in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was so smart with what they wanted to do with her in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>.\" And therein I realized that Pixar had achieved its own gold standard:\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> felt like a strategic chapter in a grander story, and therefore had<\/em> to happen to complete the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>narrative.\n\nGetting back to Woody, though, the change that occurs through him in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> is reflected through language. It is the language more than anything that presents\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> as the bookend to\u00a0Toy Story<\/em>, with two key phrases coming to have new meaning: \"being there\" and \"lost toy.\"\n\n
\n
\"Being There\"<\/h2>\nIn\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> during the staff meeting, Woody declares that the toys' job \"isn't about being played with, it's about being there for Andy when he needs us.\" More than anything, that's Woody's priority, and he longs for everyone else to prioritize that, too. There's nothing wrong with that. That should<\/em> be his priority during that stage of his life. He's Andy's toy. Therefore, his job is to be there for Andy.\n\nThroughout\u00a0Toy Story 2<\/em>, this mantra remains the same. At the beginning of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, despite nearly a decade passing and Andy being a teenager about to leave for college, this is still Woody's priority, with that same language being used. In a similar staff meeting (albeit with much less toys, now that Andy is older), Woody echoes, \"This job isn't about being played with, it's about\u2014\" \"\u2014Being there for Andy. We know.\" Jessie interrupts him, clearly having heard this speech before. Woody, perhaps naively, still longs with everything inside of him to be there for Andy.\n\n
\n\nAt the end of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, this phrase and that language comes to have completely new meaning for Woody, as scriptwriter Michael Arndt shares in the book The Art of Toy Story 3<\/em>. Arndt takes us back to that moment: Woody inside Andy's college box, ready to leave the other toys behind. As Andy prepares to say goodbye to his childhood bedroom, his mother steps into the room and becomes emotional at the sight of the room packed up and empty, the ghost of her son's formative years vanished. Andy embraces her, and she implores, \"I just wish I could always be with you.\" Andy replies, \"You will be.\" In that instant, Woody makes a revelation. His entire purpose shifts. Andy's mom will always \"be there\" for Andy, even if she's not physically in the same space as him. And therefore, so can Woody. He doesn't have to go to college with Andy to be there for Andy. This is what drives Woody to switch boxes and go to Bonnie's with the rest of the toys. This life-changing choice is gloriously affirmed for Woody in a way he never thought possible: hearing it directly from Andy himself. As Andy gives Woody to Bonnie, he shares, \"Woody has been my pal for as long as I can remember. He's brave, like a cowboy should be. And kind and smart. But the thing that makes Woody special is he'll never give up on you, ever. He'll be there<\/em> for you, no matter what.\" Andy moves on. And therefore, so can Woody.\n\nOr, so we think. From that point forward, Woody's purpose changes, as he states to Forky in Toy Story 4<\/em>: his job is to \"be there for Bonnie.\" However, his change of ownership is still something Woody is getting used to. He hasn't quite moved on from Andy, even slipping in his explanation to Forky by using Andy's name first before correcting himself. Even though Woody made a huge decision, he's having a hard time accepting the reality of change around him. This is understandable and even expected, given the strong connection Andy and Woody had.\n\nWoody was there for Andy. Now it's his job to be there for Bonnie. But does that make sense? This is the question Woody berates himself for even thinking. It's all but blasphemy to his worldview to wonder if his loyalty to his kid is anything less than permanent. We'll explore how he confronts that internal dialogue a bit later.\n\n
\n
\"Lost Toy\"<\/h2>\nThe other consistent, repeated dialogue that gives us a lot of insight toward Woody's arc is the idea of being a \"lost toy.\" Beginning in\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> and continuing forward, this is the language used to describe a toy misplaced by their owner, and thus doomed to an eternity of unfulfilled purpose, of empty desire. As Andy's mom drives away from the gas station and Woody and Buzz are left at the pump, Woody cries in despair, \"I'm lost! Oh, I'm a lost toy!\" This is his greatest fear. This is his nightmare realized.\n\nIn\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, though, this concept is turned on its head. Bo Peep shows Woody a very different perspective of the idea of a lost toy. For her, being a lost toy is not a woeful product of circumstance, it's a choice she's made \u2014 and that she's proud of.\n\nBo Peep learned that her purpose wasn't as narrow of a concept as she once believed. As \"The Nerdwriter\" observed in a recent YouTube video<\/a>, even\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>'s cinematography tries to send us messages about Woody's worldview in contrast to Bo's newfound perspective. In back-to-back cuts within the same scene, an angle focusing on Bo Peep has a bokeh, blurred background, while the same moment angled toward Woody has a stark, in-focus background, symbolizing her openness to organic decisions and embracing change as opposed to his more plan-oriented, rigid mindset at that point in the story.\n\n
\n\nThat's not to say that Woody is completely static in the first three films. In many ways, he's changed quite a lot. He's grown. For starters, in\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>he does everything in his power to be his kid's favorite toy at all costs, even if it means throwing a new favorite toy out of a window. In Toy Story 4<\/em>, he does everything to protect his kid's new favorite toy, even if it's not him and even if it means throwing himself<\/em> out of a window. Woody has learned to be selfless. He doesn't get it right all the time, but his primary motivation is meeting the needs of others rather than himself. That will be key later.\n\nIn Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody feels a pull (a call, some might even say) toward something different, but because this contradicts so fundamentally with everything he's believed for his entire life, he has difficulty 1.) acknowledging that the thought is something he even has, and 2.) moving forward toward taking action on it.\n\n
\n
Woody Leaves<\/h2>\nUltimately, Woody decides to leave Bonnie's toys \u2014 his family \u2014 to be with Bo Peep and help carnival toys get adopted by kids... In essence, to be a lost toy. What was once his greatest crisis is where he finds his fulfilled purpose. That purpose has transitioned from \"being there for Andy\" to \"being there for his kid\" to finally \"being there for all kids.\" This fluidity of his life's pursuit shows tremendous growth in Woody as an individual and as a character in a way that is instantly applicable in considering what each of us devotes our lives toward achieving.\n\nIt's easy to disqualify Woody's decision. It's understandable and even logical to at first claim it's unwise. Leaving a child to live a life of your own was villainized in Toy Story 2. <\/em>Wasn't the point of that movie was Woody learned NOT to run away from his kid? Woody was pitted as unreasonable when he wanted to leave the other toys to go to college in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>. Wasn't the take-away there, as sung in the Oscar-winning end-credits song, that \"we belong together\"?\n\nThe difference in those circumstances, though, is that in both cases Woody would've been running toward an empty life by abandoning his kid. The museum in Japan. A box in Andy's dorm room. The common factor in both scenarios is an earnestness to choose the path that leads toward meeting someone else's needs vs. satisfying his own. As much as Woody might wish Bonnie needed him, she simply doesn't anymore. She's all but discarded him. Lotso hints at it toward the climax of Toy Story 3<\/em> and Forky brings it to the forefront in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>: truth is in the eye of the beholder, and that means toys and trash might be interchangeable depending on which judge is making the verdict. To Bonnie, Woody has, sadly, become trash. Staying with her serves no purpose. It would be selfish in comparison to the opportunity of his other decision.\n\n
\n\nHere's where we surprisingly find immense value in a place I'd never expect it to be: the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>short films and television specials released 2011-2014. This collection of short-form content brought us some fun diversions in the moment, but ultimately didn't change anything major within the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>universe. Now, though, this extra media shows us something very important: Bonnie, once, truly loved Woody. This is fascinating.\n\nIf we pay close attention to the seasons within these mini-sequels, we notice two separate winter breaks for Bonnie. If\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> concluded at the beginning of a school year, there are two winters during the shorts, and\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> begins at the advent of another new school year, we can assume that the time elapsed between\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>3\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>4<\/em> is at least two years, at a minimum. This puts some longevity on what, to a viewer watching just the feature films consecutively, might seem to be hardly any passage of time.\n\nWhat's more, if the viewer makes the jump from Toy Story 3<\/em> immediately into\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody isn't really shown as being loved by Bonnie. Sure, we get the sequence when she inadvertently takes him home from Sunnyside for playtime in Toy Story 3<\/em>, but that was before we knew he would be her toy at the end. Yes, she plays with him briefly in the opening montage of\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, but quickly in the next scene she chooses to leave him in her closet.\n\nBut in the shorts and TV specials, we see her treating him as equal as any other toy. She brings him when she goes over to friends' houses. She takes him on car trips. She loves him. It's this love that's absent if we skip quickly from Toy Story 3<\/em> to\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Bonnie completely devalued what Andy told her when he gave her Woody. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Woody's torn decision to go with Bo or stay with Bonnie is based only on a misguided concept of loyalty rather than any substantial relationship.\n\n
\n\nSo Woody leaves. Finally, after years of processing who he is, why he's here, and where he belongs in this world, he acknowledges and accepts something he's never been able to before: that the answers to those questions change as time passes. There isn't one concrete definition for who a person is. Life is more fluid than that. And having made his decision and said goodbye to the toys who have been his family for decades, Woody moves on. As Bonnie's family's RV pulls away and Buzz and Woody share one last look, a familiar riff of music inhabits Randy Newman's score \u2014 the exact same cue that played when Woody appeared onscreen for the very first time in 1995. It seems this is a bookend, after all.","post_title":"[OPINION] Woody \u2014 The Character Arc of Pixar's Most Iconic Hero","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"opinion-woody-the-character-arc-of-pixars-most-iconic-hero","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-31 14:19:33","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-31 21:19:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53532","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54529,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-21 14:37:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-21 21:37:43","post_content":"It's been no secret, even from the first teaser last winter, that Frozen 2<\/em> <\/strong>will be epic. If nothing else, the Roman numerals in all the marketing let us know this is going to be a classy affair.\n\nFour new posters released from Disney today continue to highlight the adventurous scope and impressive scale of the sequel, hinting at perhaps a darker, more intricate tale than its predecessor.\n\nOne thing is for sure: WE. CAN'T. WAIT.\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThere's just one month left until Frozen 2 <\/em>debuts in theaters November 22, 2019, directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.\n
Which of these new posters is your favorite?<\/h2>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"'Frozen 2' Character Posters Foreshadow Epic Scale","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozen-2-character-posters-foreshadow-epic-scale","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:52:40","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:52:40","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53826","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54520,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-10 19:17:53","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-11 02:17:53","post_content":"\"In times of old, the world was full of wonder and magic, but times change.\"\n\nThese words herald the arrival of Pixar's newest film,\u00a0Onward<\/em><\/strong>, in theaters March 6th, 2020, from director Dan Scanlon (Monsters University<\/em>). The movie stars Chris Pratt and Tom Holland as elf brothers, living in an enchanted realm like the kind we'd typically see in a medieval story but brought forward into the present day. Check out the full trailer below!\n\n
What was your favorite moment from the Onward<\/em> trailer?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Trailer Premiereth for Pixar's 'Onward' Starring Chris Pratt and Tom Holland","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trailer-premiereth-for-pixars-onward-starring-chris-pratt-and-tom-holland","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:38:13","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:38:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53741","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54517,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-07 20:01:55","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-08 03:01:55","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nI'm a Bob Iger stan. Or, at least, I'm a Bob Iger Twitter stan.\n\nI can't help it. Getting push notifications for his tweets is like Christmas morning each time he takes to the Internet. Posts typically arrive with Iger giddy about a new project, sometimes becoming confused with the subtleties of Twitter. One time he posted about Lucasfilm head Kathy Kennedy and mistakenly tagged a Kennedy parody account. This year on the anniversary of his being named Disney CEO, he tweeted about himself in the third person. Sometimes \u2013\u2013 these are my personal favorite \u2013\u2013 he'll chime in on Disney rumors or criticism with sarcasm, such as when he rebuked Captain Marvel<\/em> naysayers by claiming Disney would build \"a Captain Marvel<\/em> land with 50 Captain Marvel<\/em> attractions, plus Captain Marvel<\/em> cruise ships, hotels, and parades.\" HE. IS. WORTH. THE. FOLLOW. GO. FOLLOW. HIM.\n\nAnyway, these remarks (both in tone and in typo errors) feel out of place for the otherwise professional, businesslike stance Iger takes nearly everywhere else he publicly communicates. For the leader of a major corporation, Iger's tweets humanize him and remind us that he's a real person with, apparently, quite an offbeat personality that doesn't often come across in interviews. The same revelatory experience is found in Iger's new book, The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of The Walt Disney Company. <\/em>Curiously published from Random House rather than Disney Editions, the book pairs legends from his Disney tenure with practical leadership advice. This goes all the way back to 1974, when Iger began his first job with ABC. Many times throughout the book, Iger writes directly to the reader with wisdom relating not just to the business world, but to professional relationships, work\/life balance, friendships in the workplace, and other topics. The purpose is clearly to impart wisdom from major career moments rather than be a biography, and the extrapolation of proverbial business lessons is a large part of the narrative here.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThe book reads as surprisingly candid, with Iger not beating around the bush at any moment. He discusses with minimal secrecy the security measures of a potential Walt Disney World terrorist attack. He talks at length about the muddled reputation Roy E. Disney carried, marred by a rosy public-facing image the company projected. He openly shares the exit of former CEO Michael Eisner, a tale Iger claims was partially falsely reported in the widespread book Disney War<\/em>. He's very direct in discussing the flaws of his present and prior colleagues and supervisors, again pointing those attributes back to a value the person did or didn't exemplify in an attempt to illustrate a point to the reader.\n\nAt the same time, though, he's always fair (or, at least, appears to be, having no way to verify without knowing the subjects personally). Just as directly as he calls out weaknesses, he acknowledges his own mistakes too, and he equally takes time to build upon others' strengths. His extensive sharing about the friendship he shared with Steve Jobs is particularly touching and revelatory. It's within this realm that the true merit of Iger's book is found, at least for the Disney fan: Here we find stories we've never heard this side of before (deleted scenes, if you will), events that we've only previously known through the lens of facts-only news articles or misconstrued rumors. Here, from the direct source, we have missing moments from Disney history suddenly and delightfully revealed in incredible detail.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nDisney usually waits a while to share its history. Though there's the usual fare of behind-the-scenes footage with each new home video release, these still feel relatively sugar-coated because the product is still new on the market. It's not until a project establishes itself as a time-tested classic (\/until there's no danger of it losing money) that we might hear the real<\/em> story of what went down \u2013\u2013 the hurdles, the obstacles, the production challenges, the difficult conversations, the creative disagreements. It wasn't until the Platinum Edition DVD collection began in 2001 that we really heard Disney share the full scope of production stories from its Renaissance-era films of the '90s. It's 2019 and we're just getting scraps of tales from the making of 2009's The Princess and the Frog<\/em> as its tenth-anniversary festivities set in motion. Likewise, Bob Iger has been CEO of The Walt Disney Company since 2005, and while we know the basics of what he's accomplished, we haven't really heard the full extent of these important moments in Disney history... (dramatic music) until now.\n\nWith Iger's reign largely anchoring on acquisitions of existing brands into the Disney fold, each of these purchases takes a significant portion of the book, beginning with Pixar and continuing with Marvel and Lucasfilm, and even touching on Fox at the end. We find out what Steve Jobs told Iger just 30 minutes before the Pixar purchase was announced that could have reversed the deal. We hear what convinced Marvel's prior owner to consider selling. We discover what happened behind the scenes with George Lucas during the production of The Force Awakens<\/em>. Iger's business acumen throughout keeps this prose from being overly gossipy \u2013\u2013 it always has a point, and (again, seemingly) always shares a fair perspective without being skewed or opinionated.\n\nFor a Disney fan, this reads as a soap opera with some sage advice sprinkled throughout. For those seeking a leadership-oriented book, this reads as an excellent delve into the mind of one of the world's most prominent leaders, offering helpful anecdotes guiding through his intricate thought processes. The \"life lessons\" aspect of the book might be a bit tangential at times, but this is forgiven by Iger's obvious passion for his career and his clear intent to make this book worthwhile for those who read it. Like his Twitter profile sometimes lets slip, Bob Iger loves what he does. And he equally loves sharing it. We have no choice but to stan.\n\n \n\nPurchase<\/a>","post_title":"[BOOK REVIEW] 'Ride of a Lifetime' is Disney CEO Bob Iger's Iconic Twitter Novelized","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"book-review-ride-of-a-lifetime-is-disney-ceo-bob-igers-iconic-twitter-novelized","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:30:57","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:30:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53709","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54423,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-09-23 14:53:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-09-23 21:53:43","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nWith official first day of fall \u2013\u2013 and now less than two months away from the release of Frozen 2 \u2013\u2013 Disney dropped a new trailer for the highly anticipated sequel.\n\nCheck it out!\n\n
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
Thoughts on the new characters? Who are you most excited to meet?<\/h2>","post_title":"New 'Frozen 2' Trailer Arrives Just in Time to Welcome Autumn","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"new-frozen-2-trailer-arrives-just-in-time-to-welcome-autumn","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-09-30 17:55:05","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-01 00:55:05","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53603","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"jnews_block_5"};
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Now in retrospect, do you agree with what Disney predicted in 2013? Was Frozen the greatest Disney animated event since The Lion King? Do you believe we're still in the Disney Revival with Frozen 2? <\/em><\/h3>\n","post_title":"[FROZEMBER] The 'Frozen' Phenomenon","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozember-the-frozen-phenomenon","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-06 07:07:47","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-06 14:07:47","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53922","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54598,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-30 16:27:46","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-30 23:27:46","post_content":"The launch of Disney+ on November 12 is now less than two weeks away. Earlier today, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusives to the streaming platform.\n\nPixar IRL<\/strong><\/em> (or, \"in real life\") is a short-form series that will bring the beloved characters of Pixar to reality in the real world. If you're picturing live-action remakes, you'd be mistaken. These moments will be brought to life out and about among unsuspecting citizens, somewhat of a prank show turned on its head. Take a look.\n\n
Will you watch this new Pixar content?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Pixar Reveals Line-Up of Original Programming for Disney+","post_excerpt":"With the launch of Disney+ on November 12 now less than 2 weeks away, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusive to the streaming platform.","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"pixar-reveals-line-up-of-original-programming-for-disney","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-01 16:56:54","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-01 23:56:54","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54596,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-28 17:46:58","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:46:58","post_content":"Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>swept the globe by storm earlier this year<\/a> and recently arrived on home video<\/a>. The film re-sparked a multitude of emotions and conversations<\/a> in its audiences as love poured out once more for arguably Pixar's most beloved franchise. Toy Story <\/em>is special, not only for the milestones it represents as Pixar's first feature and the world's first full-length computer-animated film, but also for what its themes and characters mean to its now multiple generations of viewers. Among the most prominent of observable narratives is Woody's, a character whose motivations, flaws, and changes become more complex with each passing Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>volume, whose arc is fascinating to study.\n\nMany, myself included, questioned if\u00a0Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>was necessary when it was first announced<\/a> in 2015. Toy Story 3, <\/em>released in 2010, felt like such a perfect finale, and within the context of its predecessors, allowed the whole series to function as an admirable trilogy. In nearly every category, Toy Story 3\u00a0<\/em>feels inherently like a bookend. Its opening fantasy sequence calls back the opening of Toy Story<\/em> with Andy's playtime. Its final shot (the iconic blue sky and fluffy clouds) is the first film's first shot. It has the cinematic mechanics of a perfect ending. If\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> was going to prove itself worthy, it needed to do that same legwork. As we're about to explore, it does.\n\n
\n
The Golden Rule of Pixar Sequels<\/h2>\nPixar's justification for sequels is relayed in Charles Solomon's book The Toy Story Films: An Animated Journey<\/em> (published in 2012, before Toy Story 4<\/em> was conceived). Solomon shares how Pixar filmmakers always want a sequel to feel as if it's truly the next chapter of a bigger story that the animators were trying to tell all along. A Pixar sequel should feel as if the story of the series is mapped out from the beginning, even though it isn't.\n\nThat goal works a charm in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a simple move from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> laying out a vital foundation for what was to follow, even if it didn't realize it at the time. Bo Peep was excluded from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, with director Lee Unkrich sharing in the film's bonus material that, as great of a character as she was, it didn't make sense that she would still be in the picture after all those years. Firstly, she was a lamp fixture, not a toy, but more importantly, she never belonged to Andy. She always belonged to his sister, Molly, and it didn't service the story for Andy to have kept her with his other toys as he grew up. Unkrich did state that one of his regrets of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was not featuring Bo in the opening fantasy scene, though perhaps her exclusion here was unknowingly necessary for her re-introduction in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> to pack the punch that it does.\n\n
\n\nUpon seeing\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a friend, he remarked, \"Wow, they really planned all that out well. Not having Bo Peep in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was so smart with what they wanted to do with her in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>.\" And therein I realized that Pixar had achieved its own gold standard:\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> felt like a strategic chapter in a grander story, and therefore had<\/em> to happen to complete the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>narrative.\n\nGetting back to Woody, though, the change that occurs through him in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> is reflected through language. It is the language more than anything that presents\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> as the bookend to\u00a0Toy Story<\/em>, with two key phrases coming to have new meaning: \"being there\" and \"lost toy.\"\n\n
\n
\"Being There\"<\/h2>\nIn\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> during the staff meeting, Woody declares that the toys' job \"isn't about being played with, it's about being there for Andy when he needs us.\" More than anything, that's Woody's priority, and he longs for everyone else to prioritize that, too. There's nothing wrong with that. That should<\/em> be his priority during that stage of his life. He's Andy's toy. Therefore, his job is to be there for Andy.\n\nThroughout\u00a0Toy Story 2<\/em>, this mantra remains the same. At the beginning of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, despite nearly a decade passing and Andy being a teenager about to leave for college, this is still Woody's priority, with that same language being used. In a similar staff meeting (albeit with much less toys, now that Andy is older), Woody echoes, \"This job isn't about being played with, it's about\u2014\" \"\u2014Being there for Andy. We know.\" Jessie interrupts him, clearly having heard this speech before. Woody, perhaps naively, still longs with everything inside of him to be there for Andy.\n\n
\n\nAt the end of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, this phrase and that language comes to have completely new meaning for Woody, as scriptwriter Michael Arndt shares in the book The Art of Toy Story 3<\/em>. Arndt takes us back to that moment: Woody inside Andy's college box, ready to leave the other toys behind. As Andy prepares to say goodbye to his childhood bedroom, his mother steps into the room and becomes emotional at the sight of the room packed up and empty, the ghost of her son's formative years vanished. Andy embraces her, and she implores, \"I just wish I could always be with you.\" Andy replies, \"You will be.\" In that instant, Woody makes a revelation. His entire purpose shifts. Andy's mom will always \"be there\" for Andy, even if she's not physically in the same space as him. And therefore, so can Woody. He doesn't have to go to college with Andy to be there for Andy. This is what drives Woody to switch boxes and go to Bonnie's with the rest of the toys. This life-changing choice is gloriously affirmed for Woody in a way he never thought possible: hearing it directly from Andy himself. As Andy gives Woody to Bonnie, he shares, \"Woody has been my pal for as long as I can remember. He's brave, like a cowboy should be. And kind and smart. But the thing that makes Woody special is he'll never give up on you, ever. He'll be there<\/em> for you, no matter what.\" Andy moves on. And therefore, so can Woody.\n\nOr, so we think. From that point forward, Woody's purpose changes, as he states to Forky in Toy Story 4<\/em>: his job is to \"be there for Bonnie.\" However, his change of ownership is still something Woody is getting used to. He hasn't quite moved on from Andy, even slipping in his explanation to Forky by using Andy's name first before correcting himself. Even though Woody made a huge decision, he's having a hard time accepting the reality of change around him. This is understandable and even expected, given the strong connection Andy and Woody had.\n\nWoody was there for Andy. Now it's his job to be there for Bonnie. But does that make sense? This is the question Woody berates himself for even thinking. It's all but blasphemy to his worldview to wonder if his loyalty to his kid is anything less than permanent. We'll explore how he confronts that internal dialogue a bit later.\n\n
\n
\"Lost Toy\"<\/h2>\nThe other consistent, repeated dialogue that gives us a lot of insight toward Woody's arc is the idea of being a \"lost toy.\" Beginning in\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> and continuing forward, this is the language used to describe a toy misplaced by their owner, and thus doomed to an eternity of unfulfilled purpose, of empty desire. As Andy's mom drives away from the gas station and Woody and Buzz are left at the pump, Woody cries in despair, \"I'm lost! Oh, I'm a lost toy!\" This is his greatest fear. This is his nightmare realized.\n\nIn\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, though, this concept is turned on its head. Bo Peep shows Woody a very different perspective of the idea of a lost toy. For her, being a lost toy is not a woeful product of circumstance, it's a choice she's made \u2014 and that she's proud of.\n\nBo Peep learned that her purpose wasn't as narrow of a concept as she once believed. As \"The Nerdwriter\" observed in a recent YouTube video<\/a>, even\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>'s cinematography tries to send us messages about Woody's worldview in contrast to Bo's newfound perspective. In back-to-back cuts within the same scene, an angle focusing on Bo Peep has a bokeh, blurred background, while the same moment angled toward Woody has a stark, in-focus background, symbolizing her openness to organic decisions and embracing change as opposed to his more plan-oriented, rigid mindset at that point in the story.\n\n
\n\nThat's not to say that Woody is completely static in the first three films. In many ways, he's changed quite a lot. He's grown. For starters, in\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>he does everything in his power to be his kid's favorite toy at all costs, even if it means throwing a new favorite toy out of a window. In Toy Story 4<\/em>, he does everything to protect his kid's new favorite toy, even if it's not him and even if it means throwing himself<\/em> out of a window. Woody has learned to be selfless. He doesn't get it right all the time, but his primary motivation is meeting the needs of others rather than himself. That will be key later.\n\nIn Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody feels a pull (a call, some might even say) toward something different, but because this contradicts so fundamentally with everything he's believed for his entire life, he has difficulty 1.) acknowledging that the thought is something he even has, and 2.) moving forward toward taking action on it.\n\n
\n
Woody Leaves<\/h2>\nUltimately, Woody decides to leave Bonnie's toys \u2014 his family \u2014 to be with Bo Peep and help carnival toys get adopted by kids... In essence, to be a lost toy. What was once his greatest crisis is where he finds his fulfilled purpose. That purpose has transitioned from \"being there for Andy\" to \"being there for his kid\" to finally \"being there for all kids.\" This fluidity of his life's pursuit shows tremendous growth in Woody as an individual and as a character in a way that is instantly applicable in considering what each of us devotes our lives toward achieving.\n\nIt's easy to disqualify Woody's decision. It's understandable and even logical to at first claim it's unwise. Leaving a child to live a life of your own was villainized in Toy Story 2. <\/em>Wasn't the point of that movie was Woody learned NOT to run away from his kid? Woody was pitted as unreasonable when he wanted to leave the other toys to go to college in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>. Wasn't the take-away there, as sung in the Oscar-winning end-credits song, that \"we belong together\"?\n\nThe difference in those circumstances, though, is that in both cases Woody would've been running toward an empty life by abandoning his kid. The museum in Japan. A box in Andy's dorm room. The common factor in both scenarios is an earnestness to choose the path that leads toward meeting someone else's needs vs. satisfying his own. As much as Woody might wish Bonnie needed him, she simply doesn't anymore. She's all but discarded him. Lotso hints at it toward the climax of Toy Story 3<\/em> and Forky brings it to the forefront in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>: truth is in the eye of the beholder, and that means toys and trash might be interchangeable depending on which judge is making the verdict. To Bonnie, Woody has, sadly, become trash. Staying with her serves no purpose. It would be selfish in comparison to the opportunity of his other decision.\n\n
\n\nHere's where we surprisingly find immense value in a place I'd never expect it to be: the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>short films and television specials released 2011-2014. This collection of short-form content brought us some fun diversions in the moment, but ultimately didn't change anything major within the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>universe. Now, though, this extra media shows us something very important: Bonnie, once, truly loved Woody. This is fascinating.\n\nIf we pay close attention to the seasons within these mini-sequels, we notice two separate winter breaks for Bonnie. If\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> concluded at the beginning of a school year, there are two winters during the shorts, and\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> begins at the advent of another new school year, we can assume that the time elapsed between\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>3\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>4<\/em> is at least two years, at a minimum. This puts some longevity on what, to a viewer watching just the feature films consecutively, might seem to be hardly any passage of time.\n\nWhat's more, if the viewer makes the jump from Toy Story 3<\/em> immediately into\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody isn't really shown as being loved by Bonnie. Sure, we get the sequence when she inadvertently takes him home from Sunnyside for playtime in Toy Story 3<\/em>, but that was before we knew he would be her toy at the end. Yes, she plays with him briefly in the opening montage of\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, but quickly in the next scene she chooses to leave him in her closet.\n\nBut in the shorts and TV specials, we see her treating him as equal as any other toy. She brings him when she goes over to friends' houses. She takes him on car trips. She loves him. It's this love that's absent if we skip quickly from Toy Story 3<\/em> to\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Bonnie completely devalued what Andy told her when he gave her Woody. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Woody's torn decision to go with Bo or stay with Bonnie is based only on a misguided concept of loyalty rather than any substantial relationship.\n\n
\n\nSo Woody leaves. Finally, after years of processing who he is, why he's here, and where he belongs in this world, he acknowledges and accepts something he's never been able to before: that the answers to those questions change as time passes. There isn't one concrete definition for who a person is. Life is more fluid than that. And having made his decision and said goodbye to the toys who have been his family for decades, Woody moves on. As Bonnie's family's RV pulls away and Buzz and Woody share one last look, a familiar riff of music inhabits Randy Newman's score \u2014 the exact same cue that played when Woody appeared onscreen for the very first time in 1995. It seems this is a bookend, after all.","post_title":"[OPINION] Woody \u2014 The Character Arc of Pixar's Most Iconic Hero","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"opinion-woody-the-character-arc-of-pixars-most-iconic-hero","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-31 14:19:33","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-31 21:19:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53532","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54529,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-21 14:37:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-21 21:37:43","post_content":"It's been no secret, even from the first teaser last winter, that Frozen 2<\/em> <\/strong>will be epic. If nothing else, the Roman numerals in all the marketing let us know this is going to be a classy affair.\n\nFour new posters released from Disney today continue to highlight the adventurous scope and impressive scale of the sequel, hinting at perhaps a darker, more intricate tale than its predecessor.\n\nOne thing is for sure: WE. CAN'T. WAIT.\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThere's just one month left until Frozen 2 <\/em>debuts in theaters November 22, 2019, directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.\n
Which of these new posters is your favorite?<\/h2>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"'Frozen 2' Character Posters Foreshadow Epic Scale","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozen-2-character-posters-foreshadow-epic-scale","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:52:40","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:52:40","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53826","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54520,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-10 19:17:53","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-11 02:17:53","post_content":"\"In times of old, the world was full of wonder and magic, but times change.\"\n\nThese words herald the arrival of Pixar's newest film,\u00a0Onward<\/em><\/strong>, in theaters March 6th, 2020, from director Dan Scanlon (Monsters University<\/em>). The movie stars Chris Pratt and Tom Holland as elf brothers, living in an enchanted realm like the kind we'd typically see in a medieval story but brought forward into the present day. Check out the full trailer below!\n\n
What was your favorite moment from the Onward<\/em> trailer?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Trailer Premiereth for Pixar's 'Onward' Starring Chris Pratt and Tom Holland","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trailer-premiereth-for-pixars-onward-starring-chris-pratt-and-tom-holland","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:38:13","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:38:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53741","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54517,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-07 20:01:55","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-08 03:01:55","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nI'm a Bob Iger stan. Or, at least, I'm a Bob Iger Twitter stan.\n\nI can't help it. Getting push notifications for his tweets is like Christmas morning each time he takes to the Internet. Posts typically arrive with Iger giddy about a new project, sometimes becoming confused with the subtleties of Twitter. One time he posted about Lucasfilm head Kathy Kennedy and mistakenly tagged a Kennedy parody account. This year on the anniversary of his being named Disney CEO, he tweeted about himself in the third person. Sometimes \u2013\u2013 these are my personal favorite \u2013\u2013 he'll chime in on Disney rumors or criticism with sarcasm, such as when he rebuked Captain Marvel<\/em> naysayers by claiming Disney would build \"a Captain Marvel<\/em> land with 50 Captain Marvel<\/em> attractions, plus Captain Marvel<\/em> cruise ships, hotels, and parades.\" HE. IS. WORTH. THE. FOLLOW. GO. FOLLOW. HIM.\n\nAnyway, these remarks (both in tone and in typo errors) feel out of place for the otherwise professional, businesslike stance Iger takes nearly everywhere else he publicly communicates. For the leader of a major corporation, Iger's tweets humanize him and remind us that he's a real person with, apparently, quite an offbeat personality that doesn't often come across in interviews. The same revelatory experience is found in Iger's new book, The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of The Walt Disney Company. <\/em>Curiously published from Random House rather than Disney Editions, the book pairs legends from his Disney tenure with practical leadership advice. This goes all the way back to 1974, when Iger began his first job with ABC. Many times throughout the book, Iger writes directly to the reader with wisdom relating not just to the business world, but to professional relationships, work\/life balance, friendships in the workplace, and other topics. The purpose is clearly to impart wisdom from major career moments rather than be a biography, and the extrapolation of proverbial business lessons is a large part of the narrative here.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThe book reads as surprisingly candid, with Iger not beating around the bush at any moment. He discusses with minimal secrecy the security measures of a potential Walt Disney World terrorist attack. He talks at length about the muddled reputation Roy E. Disney carried, marred by a rosy public-facing image the company projected. He openly shares the exit of former CEO Michael Eisner, a tale Iger claims was partially falsely reported in the widespread book Disney War<\/em>. He's very direct in discussing the flaws of his present and prior colleagues and supervisors, again pointing those attributes back to a value the person did or didn't exemplify in an attempt to illustrate a point to the reader.\n\nAt the same time, though, he's always fair (or, at least, appears to be, having no way to verify without knowing the subjects personally). Just as directly as he calls out weaknesses, he acknowledges his own mistakes too, and he equally takes time to build upon others' strengths. His extensive sharing about the friendship he shared with Steve Jobs is particularly touching and revelatory. It's within this realm that the true merit of Iger's book is found, at least for the Disney fan: Here we find stories we've never heard this side of before (deleted scenes, if you will), events that we've only previously known through the lens of facts-only news articles or misconstrued rumors. Here, from the direct source, we have missing moments from Disney history suddenly and delightfully revealed in incredible detail.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nDisney usually waits a while to share its history. Though there's the usual fare of behind-the-scenes footage with each new home video release, these still feel relatively sugar-coated because the product is still new on the market. It's not until a project establishes itself as a time-tested classic (\/until there's no danger of it losing money) that we might hear the real<\/em> story of what went down \u2013\u2013 the hurdles, the obstacles, the production challenges, the difficult conversations, the creative disagreements. It wasn't until the Platinum Edition DVD collection began in 2001 that we really heard Disney share the full scope of production stories from its Renaissance-era films of the '90s. It's 2019 and we're just getting scraps of tales from the making of 2009's The Princess and the Frog<\/em> as its tenth-anniversary festivities set in motion. Likewise, Bob Iger has been CEO of The Walt Disney Company since 2005, and while we know the basics of what he's accomplished, we haven't really heard the full extent of these important moments in Disney history... (dramatic music) until now.\n\nWith Iger's reign largely anchoring on acquisitions of existing brands into the Disney fold, each of these purchases takes a significant portion of the book, beginning with Pixar and continuing with Marvel and Lucasfilm, and even touching on Fox at the end. We find out what Steve Jobs told Iger just 30 minutes before the Pixar purchase was announced that could have reversed the deal. We hear what convinced Marvel's prior owner to consider selling. We discover what happened behind the scenes with George Lucas during the production of The Force Awakens<\/em>. Iger's business acumen throughout keeps this prose from being overly gossipy \u2013\u2013 it always has a point, and (again, seemingly) always shares a fair perspective without being skewed or opinionated.\n\nFor a Disney fan, this reads as a soap opera with some sage advice sprinkled throughout. For those seeking a leadership-oriented book, this reads as an excellent delve into the mind of one of the world's most prominent leaders, offering helpful anecdotes guiding through his intricate thought processes. The \"life lessons\" aspect of the book might be a bit tangential at times, but this is forgiven by Iger's obvious passion for his career and his clear intent to make this book worthwhile for those who read it. Like his Twitter profile sometimes lets slip, Bob Iger loves what he does. And he equally loves sharing it. We have no choice but to stan.\n\n \n\nPurchase<\/a>","post_title":"[BOOK REVIEW] 'Ride of a Lifetime' is Disney CEO Bob Iger's Iconic Twitter Novelized","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"book-review-ride-of-a-lifetime-is-disney-ceo-bob-igers-iconic-twitter-novelized","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:30:57","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:30:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53709","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54423,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-09-23 14:53:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-09-23 21:53:43","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nWith official first day of fall \u2013\u2013 and now less than two months away from the release of Frozen 2 \u2013\u2013 Disney dropped a new trailer for the highly anticipated sequel.\n\nCheck it out!\n\n
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
Thoughts on the new characters? Who are you most excited to meet?<\/h2>","post_title":"New 'Frozen 2' Trailer Arrives Just in Time to Welcome Autumn","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"new-frozen-2-trailer-arrives-just-in-time-to-welcome-autumn","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-09-30 17:55:05","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-01 00:55:05","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53603","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"jnews_block_5"};
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Now in retrospect, do you agree with what Disney predicted in 2013? Was Frozen the greatest Disney animated event since The Lion King? Do you believe we're still in the Disney Revival with Frozen 2? <\/em><\/h3>\n","post_title":"[FROZEMBER] The 'Frozen' Phenomenon","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozember-the-frozen-phenomenon","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-06 07:07:47","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-06 14:07:47","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53922","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54598,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-30 16:27:46","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-30 23:27:46","post_content":"The launch of Disney+ on November 12 is now less than two weeks away. Earlier today, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusives to the streaming platform.\n\nPixar IRL<\/strong><\/em> (or, \"in real life\") is a short-form series that will bring the beloved characters of Pixar to reality in the real world. If you're picturing live-action remakes, you'd be mistaken. These moments will be brought to life out and about among unsuspecting citizens, somewhat of a prank show turned on its head. Take a look.\n\n
Will you watch this new Pixar content?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Pixar Reveals Line-Up of Original Programming for Disney+","post_excerpt":"With the launch of Disney+ on November 12 now less than 2 weeks away, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusive to the streaming platform.","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"pixar-reveals-line-up-of-original-programming-for-disney","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-01 16:56:54","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-01 23:56:54","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54596,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-28 17:46:58","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:46:58","post_content":"Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>swept the globe by storm earlier this year<\/a> and recently arrived on home video<\/a>. The film re-sparked a multitude of emotions and conversations<\/a> in its audiences as love poured out once more for arguably Pixar's most beloved franchise. Toy Story <\/em>is special, not only for the milestones it represents as Pixar's first feature and the world's first full-length computer-animated film, but also for what its themes and characters mean to its now multiple generations of viewers. Among the most prominent of observable narratives is Woody's, a character whose motivations, flaws, and changes become more complex with each passing Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>volume, whose arc is fascinating to study.\n\nMany, myself included, questioned if\u00a0Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>was necessary when it was first announced<\/a> in 2015. Toy Story 3, <\/em>released in 2010, felt like such a perfect finale, and within the context of its predecessors, allowed the whole series to function as an admirable trilogy. In nearly every category, Toy Story 3\u00a0<\/em>feels inherently like a bookend. Its opening fantasy sequence calls back the opening of Toy Story<\/em> with Andy's playtime. Its final shot (the iconic blue sky and fluffy clouds) is the first film's first shot. It has the cinematic mechanics of a perfect ending. If\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> was going to prove itself worthy, it needed to do that same legwork. As we're about to explore, it does.\n\n
\n
The Golden Rule of Pixar Sequels<\/h2>\nPixar's justification for sequels is relayed in Charles Solomon's book The Toy Story Films: An Animated Journey<\/em> (published in 2012, before Toy Story 4<\/em> was conceived). Solomon shares how Pixar filmmakers always want a sequel to feel as if it's truly the next chapter of a bigger story that the animators were trying to tell all along. A Pixar sequel should feel as if the story of the series is mapped out from the beginning, even though it isn't.\n\nThat goal works a charm in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a simple move from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> laying out a vital foundation for what was to follow, even if it didn't realize it at the time. Bo Peep was excluded from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, with director Lee Unkrich sharing in the film's bonus material that, as great of a character as she was, it didn't make sense that she would still be in the picture after all those years. Firstly, she was a lamp fixture, not a toy, but more importantly, she never belonged to Andy. She always belonged to his sister, Molly, and it didn't service the story for Andy to have kept her with his other toys as he grew up. Unkrich did state that one of his regrets of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was not featuring Bo in the opening fantasy scene, though perhaps her exclusion here was unknowingly necessary for her re-introduction in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> to pack the punch that it does.\n\n
\n\nUpon seeing\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a friend, he remarked, \"Wow, they really planned all that out well. Not having Bo Peep in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was so smart with what they wanted to do with her in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>.\" And therein I realized that Pixar had achieved its own gold standard:\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> felt like a strategic chapter in a grander story, and therefore had<\/em> to happen to complete the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>narrative.\n\nGetting back to Woody, though, the change that occurs through him in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> is reflected through language. It is the language more than anything that presents\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> as the bookend to\u00a0Toy Story<\/em>, with two key phrases coming to have new meaning: \"being there\" and \"lost toy.\"\n\n
\n
\"Being There\"<\/h2>\nIn\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> during the staff meeting, Woody declares that the toys' job \"isn't about being played with, it's about being there for Andy when he needs us.\" More than anything, that's Woody's priority, and he longs for everyone else to prioritize that, too. There's nothing wrong with that. That should<\/em> be his priority during that stage of his life. He's Andy's toy. Therefore, his job is to be there for Andy.\n\nThroughout\u00a0Toy Story 2<\/em>, this mantra remains the same. At the beginning of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, despite nearly a decade passing and Andy being a teenager about to leave for college, this is still Woody's priority, with that same language being used. In a similar staff meeting (albeit with much less toys, now that Andy is older), Woody echoes, \"This job isn't about being played with, it's about\u2014\" \"\u2014Being there for Andy. We know.\" Jessie interrupts him, clearly having heard this speech before. Woody, perhaps naively, still longs with everything inside of him to be there for Andy.\n\n
\n\nAt the end of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, this phrase and that language comes to have completely new meaning for Woody, as scriptwriter Michael Arndt shares in the book The Art of Toy Story 3<\/em>. Arndt takes us back to that moment: Woody inside Andy's college box, ready to leave the other toys behind. As Andy prepares to say goodbye to his childhood bedroom, his mother steps into the room and becomes emotional at the sight of the room packed up and empty, the ghost of her son's formative years vanished. Andy embraces her, and she implores, \"I just wish I could always be with you.\" Andy replies, \"You will be.\" In that instant, Woody makes a revelation. His entire purpose shifts. Andy's mom will always \"be there\" for Andy, even if she's not physically in the same space as him. And therefore, so can Woody. He doesn't have to go to college with Andy to be there for Andy. This is what drives Woody to switch boxes and go to Bonnie's with the rest of the toys. This life-changing choice is gloriously affirmed for Woody in a way he never thought possible: hearing it directly from Andy himself. As Andy gives Woody to Bonnie, he shares, \"Woody has been my pal for as long as I can remember. He's brave, like a cowboy should be. And kind and smart. But the thing that makes Woody special is he'll never give up on you, ever. He'll be there<\/em> for you, no matter what.\" Andy moves on. And therefore, so can Woody.\n\nOr, so we think. From that point forward, Woody's purpose changes, as he states to Forky in Toy Story 4<\/em>: his job is to \"be there for Bonnie.\" However, his change of ownership is still something Woody is getting used to. He hasn't quite moved on from Andy, even slipping in his explanation to Forky by using Andy's name first before correcting himself. Even though Woody made a huge decision, he's having a hard time accepting the reality of change around him. This is understandable and even expected, given the strong connection Andy and Woody had.\n\nWoody was there for Andy. Now it's his job to be there for Bonnie. But does that make sense? This is the question Woody berates himself for even thinking. It's all but blasphemy to his worldview to wonder if his loyalty to his kid is anything less than permanent. We'll explore how he confronts that internal dialogue a bit later.\n\n
\n
\"Lost Toy\"<\/h2>\nThe other consistent, repeated dialogue that gives us a lot of insight toward Woody's arc is the idea of being a \"lost toy.\" Beginning in\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> and continuing forward, this is the language used to describe a toy misplaced by their owner, and thus doomed to an eternity of unfulfilled purpose, of empty desire. As Andy's mom drives away from the gas station and Woody and Buzz are left at the pump, Woody cries in despair, \"I'm lost! Oh, I'm a lost toy!\" This is his greatest fear. This is his nightmare realized.\n\nIn\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, though, this concept is turned on its head. Bo Peep shows Woody a very different perspective of the idea of a lost toy. For her, being a lost toy is not a woeful product of circumstance, it's a choice she's made \u2014 and that she's proud of.\n\nBo Peep learned that her purpose wasn't as narrow of a concept as she once believed. As \"The Nerdwriter\" observed in a recent YouTube video<\/a>, even\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>'s cinematography tries to send us messages about Woody's worldview in contrast to Bo's newfound perspective. In back-to-back cuts within the same scene, an angle focusing on Bo Peep has a bokeh, blurred background, while the same moment angled toward Woody has a stark, in-focus background, symbolizing her openness to organic decisions and embracing change as opposed to his more plan-oriented, rigid mindset at that point in the story.\n\n
\n\nThat's not to say that Woody is completely static in the first three films. In many ways, he's changed quite a lot. He's grown. For starters, in\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>he does everything in his power to be his kid's favorite toy at all costs, even if it means throwing a new favorite toy out of a window. In Toy Story 4<\/em>, he does everything to protect his kid's new favorite toy, even if it's not him and even if it means throwing himself<\/em> out of a window. Woody has learned to be selfless. He doesn't get it right all the time, but his primary motivation is meeting the needs of others rather than himself. That will be key later.\n\nIn Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody feels a pull (a call, some might even say) toward something different, but because this contradicts so fundamentally with everything he's believed for his entire life, he has difficulty 1.) acknowledging that the thought is something he even has, and 2.) moving forward toward taking action on it.\n\n
\n
Woody Leaves<\/h2>\nUltimately, Woody decides to leave Bonnie's toys \u2014 his family \u2014 to be with Bo Peep and help carnival toys get adopted by kids... In essence, to be a lost toy. What was once his greatest crisis is where he finds his fulfilled purpose. That purpose has transitioned from \"being there for Andy\" to \"being there for his kid\" to finally \"being there for all kids.\" This fluidity of his life's pursuit shows tremendous growth in Woody as an individual and as a character in a way that is instantly applicable in considering what each of us devotes our lives toward achieving.\n\nIt's easy to disqualify Woody's decision. It's understandable and even logical to at first claim it's unwise. Leaving a child to live a life of your own was villainized in Toy Story 2. <\/em>Wasn't the point of that movie was Woody learned NOT to run away from his kid? Woody was pitted as unreasonable when he wanted to leave the other toys to go to college in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>. Wasn't the take-away there, as sung in the Oscar-winning end-credits song, that \"we belong together\"?\n\nThe difference in those circumstances, though, is that in both cases Woody would've been running toward an empty life by abandoning his kid. The museum in Japan. A box in Andy's dorm room. The common factor in both scenarios is an earnestness to choose the path that leads toward meeting someone else's needs vs. satisfying his own. As much as Woody might wish Bonnie needed him, she simply doesn't anymore. She's all but discarded him. Lotso hints at it toward the climax of Toy Story 3<\/em> and Forky brings it to the forefront in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>: truth is in the eye of the beholder, and that means toys and trash might be interchangeable depending on which judge is making the verdict. To Bonnie, Woody has, sadly, become trash. Staying with her serves no purpose. It would be selfish in comparison to the opportunity of his other decision.\n\n
\n\nHere's where we surprisingly find immense value in a place I'd never expect it to be: the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>short films and television specials released 2011-2014. This collection of short-form content brought us some fun diversions in the moment, but ultimately didn't change anything major within the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>universe. Now, though, this extra media shows us something very important: Bonnie, once, truly loved Woody. This is fascinating.\n\nIf we pay close attention to the seasons within these mini-sequels, we notice two separate winter breaks for Bonnie. If\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> concluded at the beginning of a school year, there are two winters during the shorts, and\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> begins at the advent of another new school year, we can assume that the time elapsed between\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>3\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>4<\/em> is at least two years, at a minimum. This puts some longevity on what, to a viewer watching just the feature films consecutively, might seem to be hardly any passage of time.\n\nWhat's more, if the viewer makes the jump from Toy Story 3<\/em> immediately into\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody isn't really shown as being loved by Bonnie. Sure, we get the sequence when she inadvertently takes him home from Sunnyside for playtime in Toy Story 3<\/em>, but that was before we knew he would be her toy at the end. Yes, she plays with him briefly in the opening montage of\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, but quickly in the next scene she chooses to leave him in her closet.\n\nBut in the shorts and TV specials, we see her treating him as equal as any other toy. She brings him when she goes over to friends' houses. She takes him on car trips. She loves him. It's this love that's absent if we skip quickly from Toy Story 3<\/em> to\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Bonnie completely devalued what Andy told her when he gave her Woody. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Woody's torn decision to go with Bo or stay with Bonnie is based only on a misguided concept of loyalty rather than any substantial relationship.\n\n
\n\nSo Woody leaves. Finally, after years of processing who he is, why he's here, and where he belongs in this world, he acknowledges and accepts something he's never been able to before: that the answers to those questions change as time passes. There isn't one concrete definition for who a person is. Life is more fluid than that. And having made his decision and said goodbye to the toys who have been his family for decades, Woody moves on. As Bonnie's family's RV pulls away and Buzz and Woody share one last look, a familiar riff of music inhabits Randy Newman's score \u2014 the exact same cue that played when Woody appeared onscreen for the very first time in 1995. It seems this is a bookend, after all.","post_title":"[OPINION] Woody \u2014 The Character Arc of Pixar's Most Iconic Hero","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"opinion-woody-the-character-arc-of-pixars-most-iconic-hero","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-31 14:19:33","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-31 21:19:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53532","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54529,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-21 14:37:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-21 21:37:43","post_content":"It's been no secret, even from the first teaser last winter, that Frozen 2<\/em> <\/strong>will be epic. If nothing else, the Roman numerals in all the marketing let us know this is going to be a classy affair.\n\nFour new posters released from Disney today continue to highlight the adventurous scope and impressive scale of the sequel, hinting at perhaps a darker, more intricate tale than its predecessor.\n\nOne thing is for sure: WE. CAN'T. WAIT.\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThere's just one month left until Frozen 2 <\/em>debuts in theaters November 22, 2019, directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.\n
Which of these new posters is your favorite?<\/h2>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"'Frozen 2' Character Posters Foreshadow Epic Scale","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozen-2-character-posters-foreshadow-epic-scale","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:52:40","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:52:40","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53826","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54520,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-10 19:17:53","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-11 02:17:53","post_content":"\"In times of old, the world was full of wonder and magic, but times change.\"\n\nThese words herald the arrival of Pixar's newest film,\u00a0Onward<\/em><\/strong>, in theaters March 6th, 2020, from director Dan Scanlon (Monsters University<\/em>). The movie stars Chris Pratt and Tom Holland as elf brothers, living in an enchanted realm like the kind we'd typically see in a medieval story but brought forward into the present day. Check out the full trailer below!\n\n
What was your favorite moment from the Onward<\/em> trailer?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Trailer Premiereth for Pixar's 'Onward' Starring Chris Pratt and Tom Holland","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trailer-premiereth-for-pixars-onward-starring-chris-pratt-and-tom-holland","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:38:13","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:38:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53741","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54517,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-07 20:01:55","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-08 03:01:55","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nI'm a Bob Iger stan. Or, at least, I'm a Bob Iger Twitter stan.\n\nI can't help it. Getting push notifications for his tweets is like Christmas morning each time he takes to the Internet. Posts typically arrive with Iger giddy about a new project, sometimes becoming confused with the subtleties of Twitter. One time he posted about Lucasfilm head Kathy Kennedy and mistakenly tagged a Kennedy parody account. This year on the anniversary of his being named Disney CEO, he tweeted about himself in the third person. Sometimes \u2013\u2013 these are my personal favorite \u2013\u2013 he'll chime in on Disney rumors or criticism with sarcasm, such as when he rebuked Captain Marvel<\/em> naysayers by claiming Disney would build \"a Captain Marvel<\/em> land with 50 Captain Marvel<\/em> attractions, plus Captain Marvel<\/em> cruise ships, hotels, and parades.\" HE. IS. WORTH. THE. FOLLOW. GO. FOLLOW. HIM.\n\nAnyway, these remarks (both in tone and in typo errors) feel out of place for the otherwise professional, businesslike stance Iger takes nearly everywhere else he publicly communicates. For the leader of a major corporation, Iger's tweets humanize him and remind us that he's a real person with, apparently, quite an offbeat personality that doesn't often come across in interviews. The same revelatory experience is found in Iger's new book, The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of The Walt Disney Company. <\/em>Curiously published from Random House rather than Disney Editions, the book pairs legends from his Disney tenure with practical leadership advice. This goes all the way back to 1974, when Iger began his first job with ABC. Many times throughout the book, Iger writes directly to the reader with wisdom relating not just to the business world, but to professional relationships, work\/life balance, friendships in the workplace, and other topics. The purpose is clearly to impart wisdom from major career moments rather than be a biography, and the extrapolation of proverbial business lessons is a large part of the narrative here.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThe book reads as surprisingly candid, with Iger not beating around the bush at any moment. He discusses with minimal secrecy the security measures of a potential Walt Disney World terrorist attack. He talks at length about the muddled reputation Roy E. Disney carried, marred by a rosy public-facing image the company projected. He openly shares the exit of former CEO Michael Eisner, a tale Iger claims was partially falsely reported in the widespread book Disney War<\/em>. He's very direct in discussing the flaws of his present and prior colleagues and supervisors, again pointing those attributes back to a value the person did or didn't exemplify in an attempt to illustrate a point to the reader.\n\nAt the same time, though, he's always fair (or, at least, appears to be, having no way to verify without knowing the subjects personally). Just as directly as he calls out weaknesses, he acknowledges his own mistakes too, and he equally takes time to build upon others' strengths. His extensive sharing about the friendship he shared with Steve Jobs is particularly touching and revelatory. It's within this realm that the true merit of Iger's book is found, at least for the Disney fan: Here we find stories we've never heard this side of before (deleted scenes, if you will), events that we've only previously known through the lens of facts-only news articles or misconstrued rumors. Here, from the direct source, we have missing moments from Disney history suddenly and delightfully revealed in incredible detail.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nDisney usually waits a while to share its history. Though there's the usual fare of behind-the-scenes footage with each new home video release, these still feel relatively sugar-coated because the product is still new on the market. It's not until a project establishes itself as a time-tested classic (\/until there's no danger of it losing money) that we might hear the real<\/em> story of what went down \u2013\u2013 the hurdles, the obstacles, the production challenges, the difficult conversations, the creative disagreements. It wasn't until the Platinum Edition DVD collection began in 2001 that we really heard Disney share the full scope of production stories from its Renaissance-era films of the '90s. It's 2019 and we're just getting scraps of tales from the making of 2009's The Princess and the Frog<\/em> as its tenth-anniversary festivities set in motion. Likewise, Bob Iger has been CEO of The Walt Disney Company since 2005, and while we know the basics of what he's accomplished, we haven't really heard the full extent of these important moments in Disney history... (dramatic music) until now.\n\nWith Iger's reign largely anchoring on acquisitions of existing brands into the Disney fold, each of these purchases takes a significant portion of the book, beginning with Pixar and continuing with Marvel and Lucasfilm, and even touching on Fox at the end. We find out what Steve Jobs told Iger just 30 minutes before the Pixar purchase was announced that could have reversed the deal. We hear what convinced Marvel's prior owner to consider selling. We discover what happened behind the scenes with George Lucas during the production of The Force Awakens<\/em>. Iger's business acumen throughout keeps this prose from being overly gossipy \u2013\u2013 it always has a point, and (again, seemingly) always shares a fair perspective without being skewed or opinionated.\n\nFor a Disney fan, this reads as a soap opera with some sage advice sprinkled throughout. For those seeking a leadership-oriented book, this reads as an excellent delve into the mind of one of the world's most prominent leaders, offering helpful anecdotes guiding through his intricate thought processes. The \"life lessons\" aspect of the book might be a bit tangential at times, but this is forgiven by Iger's obvious passion for his career and his clear intent to make this book worthwhile for those who read it. Like his Twitter profile sometimes lets slip, Bob Iger loves what he does. And he equally loves sharing it. We have no choice but to stan.\n\n \n\nPurchase<\/a>","post_title":"[BOOK REVIEW] 'Ride of a Lifetime' is Disney CEO Bob Iger's Iconic Twitter Novelized","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"book-review-ride-of-a-lifetime-is-disney-ceo-bob-igers-iconic-twitter-novelized","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:30:57","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:30:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53709","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54423,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-09-23 14:53:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-09-23 21:53:43","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nWith official first day of fall \u2013\u2013 and now less than two months away from the release of Frozen 2 \u2013\u2013 Disney dropped a new trailer for the highly anticipated sequel.\n\nCheck it out!\n\n
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
Thoughts on the new characters? Who are you most excited to meet?<\/h2>","post_title":"New 'Frozen 2' Trailer Arrives Just in Time to Welcome Autumn","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"new-frozen-2-trailer-arrives-just-in-time-to-welcome-autumn","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-09-30 17:55:05","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-01 00:55:05","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53603","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"jnews_block_5"};
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Now in retrospect, do you agree with what Disney predicted in 2013? Was Frozen the greatest Disney animated event since The Lion King? Do you believe we're still in the Disney Revival with Frozen 2? <\/em><\/h3>\n","post_title":"[FROZEMBER] The 'Frozen' Phenomenon","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozember-the-frozen-phenomenon","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-06 07:07:47","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-06 14:07:47","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53922","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54598,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-30 16:27:46","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-30 23:27:46","post_content":"The launch of Disney+ on November 12 is now less than two weeks away. Earlier today, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusives to the streaming platform.\n\nPixar IRL<\/strong><\/em> (or, \"in real life\") is a short-form series that will bring the beloved characters of Pixar to reality in the real world. If you're picturing live-action remakes, you'd be mistaken. These moments will be brought to life out and about among unsuspecting citizens, somewhat of a prank show turned on its head. Take a look.\n\n
Will you watch this new Pixar content?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Pixar Reveals Line-Up of Original Programming for Disney+","post_excerpt":"With the launch of Disney+ on November 12 now less than 2 weeks away, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusive to the streaming platform.","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"pixar-reveals-line-up-of-original-programming-for-disney","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-01 16:56:54","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-01 23:56:54","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54596,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-28 17:46:58","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:46:58","post_content":"Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>swept the globe by storm earlier this year<\/a> and recently arrived on home video<\/a>. The film re-sparked a multitude of emotions and conversations<\/a> in its audiences as love poured out once more for arguably Pixar's most beloved franchise. Toy Story <\/em>is special, not only for the milestones it represents as Pixar's first feature and the world's first full-length computer-animated film, but also for what its themes and characters mean to its now multiple generations of viewers. Among the most prominent of observable narratives is Woody's, a character whose motivations, flaws, and changes become more complex with each passing Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>volume, whose arc is fascinating to study.\n\nMany, myself included, questioned if\u00a0Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>was necessary when it was first announced<\/a> in 2015. Toy Story 3, <\/em>released in 2010, felt like such a perfect finale, and within the context of its predecessors, allowed the whole series to function as an admirable trilogy. In nearly every category, Toy Story 3\u00a0<\/em>feels inherently like a bookend. Its opening fantasy sequence calls back the opening of Toy Story<\/em> with Andy's playtime. Its final shot (the iconic blue sky and fluffy clouds) is the first film's first shot. It has the cinematic mechanics of a perfect ending. If\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> was going to prove itself worthy, it needed to do that same legwork. As we're about to explore, it does.\n\n
\n
The Golden Rule of Pixar Sequels<\/h2>\nPixar's justification for sequels is relayed in Charles Solomon's book The Toy Story Films: An Animated Journey<\/em> (published in 2012, before Toy Story 4<\/em> was conceived). Solomon shares how Pixar filmmakers always want a sequel to feel as if it's truly the next chapter of a bigger story that the animators were trying to tell all along. A Pixar sequel should feel as if the story of the series is mapped out from the beginning, even though it isn't.\n\nThat goal works a charm in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a simple move from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> laying out a vital foundation for what was to follow, even if it didn't realize it at the time. Bo Peep was excluded from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, with director Lee Unkrich sharing in the film's bonus material that, as great of a character as she was, it didn't make sense that she would still be in the picture after all those years. Firstly, she was a lamp fixture, not a toy, but more importantly, she never belonged to Andy. She always belonged to his sister, Molly, and it didn't service the story for Andy to have kept her with his other toys as he grew up. Unkrich did state that one of his regrets of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was not featuring Bo in the opening fantasy scene, though perhaps her exclusion here was unknowingly necessary for her re-introduction in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> to pack the punch that it does.\n\n
\n\nUpon seeing\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a friend, he remarked, \"Wow, they really planned all that out well. Not having Bo Peep in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was so smart with what they wanted to do with her in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>.\" And therein I realized that Pixar had achieved its own gold standard:\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> felt like a strategic chapter in a grander story, and therefore had<\/em> to happen to complete the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>narrative.\n\nGetting back to Woody, though, the change that occurs through him in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> is reflected through language. It is the language more than anything that presents\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> as the bookend to\u00a0Toy Story<\/em>, with two key phrases coming to have new meaning: \"being there\" and \"lost toy.\"\n\n
\n
\"Being There\"<\/h2>\nIn\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> during the staff meeting, Woody declares that the toys' job \"isn't about being played with, it's about being there for Andy when he needs us.\" More than anything, that's Woody's priority, and he longs for everyone else to prioritize that, too. There's nothing wrong with that. That should<\/em> be his priority during that stage of his life. He's Andy's toy. Therefore, his job is to be there for Andy.\n\nThroughout\u00a0Toy Story 2<\/em>, this mantra remains the same. At the beginning of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, despite nearly a decade passing and Andy being a teenager about to leave for college, this is still Woody's priority, with that same language being used. In a similar staff meeting (albeit with much less toys, now that Andy is older), Woody echoes, \"This job isn't about being played with, it's about\u2014\" \"\u2014Being there for Andy. We know.\" Jessie interrupts him, clearly having heard this speech before. Woody, perhaps naively, still longs with everything inside of him to be there for Andy.\n\n
\n\nAt the end of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, this phrase and that language comes to have completely new meaning for Woody, as scriptwriter Michael Arndt shares in the book The Art of Toy Story 3<\/em>. Arndt takes us back to that moment: Woody inside Andy's college box, ready to leave the other toys behind. As Andy prepares to say goodbye to his childhood bedroom, his mother steps into the room and becomes emotional at the sight of the room packed up and empty, the ghost of her son's formative years vanished. Andy embraces her, and she implores, \"I just wish I could always be with you.\" Andy replies, \"You will be.\" In that instant, Woody makes a revelation. His entire purpose shifts. Andy's mom will always \"be there\" for Andy, even if she's not physically in the same space as him. And therefore, so can Woody. He doesn't have to go to college with Andy to be there for Andy. This is what drives Woody to switch boxes and go to Bonnie's with the rest of the toys. This life-changing choice is gloriously affirmed for Woody in a way he never thought possible: hearing it directly from Andy himself. As Andy gives Woody to Bonnie, he shares, \"Woody has been my pal for as long as I can remember. He's brave, like a cowboy should be. And kind and smart. But the thing that makes Woody special is he'll never give up on you, ever. He'll be there<\/em> for you, no matter what.\" Andy moves on. And therefore, so can Woody.\n\nOr, so we think. From that point forward, Woody's purpose changes, as he states to Forky in Toy Story 4<\/em>: his job is to \"be there for Bonnie.\" However, his change of ownership is still something Woody is getting used to. He hasn't quite moved on from Andy, even slipping in his explanation to Forky by using Andy's name first before correcting himself. Even though Woody made a huge decision, he's having a hard time accepting the reality of change around him. This is understandable and even expected, given the strong connection Andy and Woody had.\n\nWoody was there for Andy. Now it's his job to be there for Bonnie. But does that make sense? This is the question Woody berates himself for even thinking. It's all but blasphemy to his worldview to wonder if his loyalty to his kid is anything less than permanent. We'll explore how he confronts that internal dialogue a bit later.\n\n
\n
\"Lost Toy\"<\/h2>\nThe other consistent, repeated dialogue that gives us a lot of insight toward Woody's arc is the idea of being a \"lost toy.\" Beginning in\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> and continuing forward, this is the language used to describe a toy misplaced by their owner, and thus doomed to an eternity of unfulfilled purpose, of empty desire. As Andy's mom drives away from the gas station and Woody and Buzz are left at the pump, Woody cries in despair, \"I'm lost! Oh, I'm a lost toy!\" This is his greatest fear. This is his nightmare realized.\n\nIn\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, though, this concept is turned on its head. Bo Peep shows Woody a very different perspective of the idea of a lost toy. For her, being a lost toy is not a woeful product of circumstance, it's a choice she's made \u2014 and that she's proud of.\n\nBo Peep learned that her purpose wasn't as narrow of a concept as she once believed. As \"The Nerdwriter\" observed in a recent YouTube video<\/a>, even\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>'s cinematography tries to send us messages about Woody's worldview in contrast to Bo's newfound perspective. In back-to-back cuts within the same scene, an angle focusing on Bo Peep has a bokeh, blurred background, while the same moment angled toward Woody has a stark, in-focus background, symbolizing her openness to organic decisions and embracing change as opposed to his more plan-oriented, rigid mindset at that point in the story.\n\n
\n\nThat's not to say that Woody is completely static in the first three films. In many ways, he's changed quite a lot. He's grown. For starters, in\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>he does everything in his power to be his kid's favorite toy at all costs, even if it means throwing a new favorite toy out of a window. In Toy Story 4<\/em>, he does everything to protect his kid's new favorite toy, even if it's not him and even if it means throwing himself<\/em> out of a window. Woody has learned to be selfless. He doesn't get it right all the time, but his primary motivation is meeting the needs of others rather than himself. That will be key later.\n\nIn Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody feels a pull (a call, some might even say) toward something different, but because this contradicts so fundamentally with everything he's believed for his entire life, he has difficulty 1.) acknowledging that the thought is something he even has, and 2.) moving forward toward taking action on it.\n\n
\n
Woody Leaves<\/h2>\nUltimately, Woody decides to leave Bonnie's toys \u2014 his family \u2014 to be with Bo Peep and help carnival toys get adopted by kids... In essence, to be a lost toy. What was once his greatest crisis is where he finds his fulfilled purpose. That purpose has transitioned from \"being there for Andy\" to \"being there for his kid\" to finally \"being there for all kids.\" This fluidity of his life's pursuit shows tremendous growth in Woody as an individual and as a character in a way that is instantly applicable in considering what each of us devotes our lives toward achieving.\n\nIt's easy to disqualify Woody's decision. It's understandable and even logical to at first claim it's unwise. Leaving a child to live a life of your own was villainized in Toy Story 2. <\/em>Wasn't the point of that movie was Woody learned NOT to run away from his kid? Woody was pitted as unreasonable when he wanted to leave the other toys to go to college in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>. Wasn't the take-away there, as sung in the Oscar-winning end-credits song, that \"we belong together\"?\n\nThe difference in those circumstances, though, is that in both cases Woody would've been running toward an empty life by abandoning his kid. The museum in Japan. A box in Andy's dorm room. The common factor in both scenarios is an earnestness to choose the path that leads toward meeting someone else's needs vs. satisfying his own. As much as Woody might wish Bonnie needed him, she simply doesn't anymore. She's all but discarded him. Lotso hints at it toward the climax of Toy Story 3<\/em> and Forky brings it to the forefront in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>: truth is in the eye of the beholder, and that means toys and trash might be interchangeable depending on which judge is making the verdict. To Bonnie, Woody has, sadly, become trash. Staying with her serves no purpose. It would be selfish in comparison to the opportunity of his other decision.\n\n
\n\nHere's where we surprisingly find immense value in a place I'd never expect it to be: the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>short films and television specials released 2011-2014. This collection of short-form content brought us some fun diversions in the moment, but ultimately didn't change anything major within the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>universe. Now, though, this extra media shows us something very important: Bonnie, once, truly loved Woody. This is fascinating.\n\nIf we pay close attention to the seasons within these mini-sequels, we notice two separate winter breaks for Bonnie. If\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> concluded at the beginning of a school year, there are two winters during the shorts, and\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> begins at the advent of another new school year, we can assume that the time elapsed between\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>3\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>4<\/em> is at least two years, at a minimum. This puts some longevity on what, to a viewer watching just the feature films consecutively, might seem to be hardly any passage of time.\n\nWhat's more, if the viewer makes the jump from Toy Story 3<\/em> immediately into\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody isn't really shown as being loved by Bonnie. Sure, we get the sequence when she inadvertently takes him home from Sunnyside for playtime in Toy Story 3<\/em>, but that was before we knew he would be her toy at the end. Yes, she plays with him briefly in the opening montage of\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, but quickly in the next scene she chooses to leave him in her closet.\n\nBut in the shorts and TV specials, we see her treating him as equal as any other toy. She brings him when she goes over to friends' houses. She takes him on car trips. She loves him. It's this love that's absent if we skip quickly from Toy Story 3<\/em> to\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Bonnie completely devalued what Andy told her when he gave her Woody. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Woody's torn decision to go with Bo or stay with Bonnie is based only on a misguided concept of loyalty rather than any substantial relationship.\n\n
\n\nSo Woody leaves. Finally, after years of processing who he is, why he's here, and where he belongs in this world, he acknowledges and accepts something he's never been able to before: that the answers to those questions change as time passes. There isn't one concrete definition for who a person is. Life is more fluid than that. And having made his decision and said goodbye to the toys who have been his family for decades, Woody moves on. As Bonnie's family's RV pulls away and Buzz and Woody share one last look, a familiar riff of music inhabits Randy Newman's score \u2014 the exact same cue that played when Woody appeared onscreen for the very first time in 1995. It seems this is a bookend, after all.","post_title":"[OPINION] Woody \u2014 The Character Arc of Pixar's Most Iconic Hero","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"opinion-woody-the-character-arc-of-pixars-most-iconic-hero","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-31 14:19:33","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-31 21:19:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53532","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54529,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-21 14:37:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-21 21:37:43","post_content":"It's been no secret, even from the first teaser last winter, that Frozen 2<\/em> <\/strong>will be epic. If nothing else, the Roman numerals in all the marketing let us know this is going to be a classy affair.\n\nFour new posters released from Disney today continue to highlight the adventurous scope and impressive scale of the sequel, hinting at perhaps a darker, more intricate tale than its predecessor.\n\nOne thing is for sure: WE. CAN'T. WAIT.\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThere's just one month left until Frozen 2 <\/em>debuts in theaters November 22, 2019, directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.\n
Which of these new posters is your favorite?<\/h2>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"'Frozen 2' Character Posters Foreshadow Epic Scale","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozen-2-character-posters-foreshadow-epic-scale","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:52:40","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:52:40","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53826","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54520,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-10 19:17:53","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-11 02:17:53","post_content":"\"In times of old, the world was full of wonder and magic, but times change.\"\n\nThese words herald the arrival of Pixar's newest film,\u00a0Onward<\/em><\/strong>, in theaters March 6th, 2020, from director Dan Scanlon (Monsters University<\/em>). The movie stars Chris Pratt and Tom Holland as elf brothers, living in an enchanted realm like the kind we'd typically see in a medieval story but brought forward into the present day. Check out the full trailer below!\n\n
What was your favorite moment from the Onward<\/em> trailer?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Trailer Premiereth for Pixar's 'Onward' Starring Chris Pratt and Tom Holland","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trailer-premiereth-for-pixars-onward-starring-chris-pratt-and-tom-holland","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:38:13","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:38:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53741","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54517,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-07 20:01:55","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-08 03:01:55","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nI'm a Bob Iger stan. Or, at least, I'm a Bob Iger Twitter stan.\n\nI can't help it. Getting push notifications for his tweets is like Christmas morning each time he takes to the Internet. Posts typically arrive with Iger giddy about a new project, sometimes becoming confused with the subtleties of Twitter. One time he posted about Lucasfilm head Kathy Kennedy and mistakenly tagged a Kennedy parody account. This year on the anniversary of his being named Disney CEO, he tweeted about himself in the third person. Sometimes \u2013\u2013 these are my personal favorite \u2013\u2013 he'll chime in on Disney rumors or criticism with sarcasm, such as when he rebuked Captain Marvel<\/em> naysayers by claiming Disney would build \"a Captain Marvel<\/em> land with 50 Captain Marvel<\/em> attractions, plus Captain Marvel<\/em> cruise ships, hotels, and parades.\" HE. IS. WORTH. THE. FOLLOW. GO. FOLLOW. HIM.\n\nAnyway, these remarks (both in tone and in typo errors) feel out of place for the otherwise professional, businesslike stance Iger takes nearly everywhere else he publicly communicates. For the leader of a major corporation, Iger's tweets humanize him and remind us that he's a real person with, apparently, quite an offbeat personality that doesn't often come across in interviews. The same revelatory experience is found in Iger's new book, The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of The Walt Disney Company. <\/em>Curiously published from Random House rather than Disney Editions, the book pairs legends from his Disney tenure with practical leadership advice. This goes all the way back to 1974, when Iger began his first job with ABC. Many times throughout the book, Iger writes directly to the reader with wisdom relating not just to the business world, but to professional relationships, work\/life balance, friendships in the workplace, and other topics. The purpose is clearly to impart wisdom from major career moments rather than be a biography, and the extrapolation of proverbial business lessons is a large part of the narrative here.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThe book reads as surprisingly candid, with Iger not beating around the bush at any moment. He discusses with minimal secrecy the security measures of a potential Walt Disney World terrorist attack. He talks at length about the muddled reputation Roy E. Disney carried, marred by a rosy public-facing image the company projected. He openly shares the exit of former CEO Michael Eisner, a tale Iger claims was partially falsely reported in the widespread book Disney War<\/em>. He's very direct in discussing the flaws of his present and prior colleagues and supervisors, again pointing those attributes back to a value the person did or didn't exemplify in an attempt to illustrate a point to the reader.\n\nAt the same time, though, he's always fair (or, at least, appears to be, having no way to verify without knowing the subjects personally). Just as directly as he calls out weaknesses, he acknowledges his own mistakes too, and he equally takes time to build upon others' strengths. His extensive sharing about the friendship he shared with Steve Jobs is particularly touching and revelatory. It's within this realm that the true merit of Iger's book is found, at least for the Disney fan: Here we find stories we've never heard this side of before (deleted scenes, if you will), events that we've only previously known through the lens of facts-only news articles or misconstrued rumors. Here, from the direct source, we have missing moments from Disney history suddenly and delightfully revealed in incredible detail.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nDisney usually waits a while to share its history. Though there's the usual fare of behind-the-scenes footage with each new home video release, these still feel relatively sugar-coated because the product is still new on the market. It's not until a project establishes itself as a time-tested classic (\/until there's no danger of it losing money) that we might hear the real<\/em> story of what went down \u2013\u2013 the hurdles, the obstacles, the production challenges, the difficult conversations, the creative disagreements. It wasn't until the Platinum Edition DVD collection began in 2001 that we really heard Disney share the full scope of production stories from its Renaissance-era films of the '90s. It's 2019 and we're just getting scraps of tales from the making of 2009's The Princess and the Frog<\/em> as its tenth-anniversary festivities set in motion. Likewise, Bob Iger has been CEO of The Walt Disney Company since 2005, and while we know the basics of what he's accomplished, we haven't really heard the full extent of these important moments in Disney history... (dramatic music) until now.\n\nWith Iger's reign largely anchoring on acquisitions of existing brands into the Disney fold, each of these purchases takes a significant portion of the book, beginning with Pixar and continuing with Marvel and Lucasfilm, and even touching on Fox at the end. We find out what Steve Jobs told Iger just 30 minutes before the Pixar purchase was announced that could have reversed the deal. We hear what convinced Marvel's prior owner to consider selling. We discover what happened behind the scenes with George Lucas during the production of The Force Awakens<\/em>. Iger's business acumen throughout keeps this prose from being overly gossipy \u2013\u2013 it always has a point, and (again, seemingly) always shares a fair perspective without being skewed or opinionated.\n\nFor a Disney fan, this reads as a soap opera with some sage advice sprinkled throughout. For those seeking a leadership-oriented book, this reads as an excellent delve into the mind of one of the world's most prominent leaders, offering helpful anecdotes guiding through his intricate thought processes. The \"life lessons\" aspect of the book might be a bit tangential at times, but this is forgiven by Iger's obvious passion for his career and his clear intent to make this book worthwhile for those who read it. Like his Twitter profile sometimes lets slip, Bob Iger loves what he does. And he equally loves sharing it. We have no choice but to stan.\n\n \n\nPurchase<\/a>","post_title":"[BOOK REVIEW] 'Ride of a Lifetime' is Disney CEO Bob Iger's Iconic Twitter Novelized","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"book-review-ride-of-a-lifetime-is-disney-ceo-bob-igers-iconic-twitter-novelized","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:30:57","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:30:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53709","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54423,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-09-23 14:53:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-09-23 21:53:43","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nWith official first day of fall \u2013\u2013 and now less than two months away from the release of Frozen 2 \u2013\u2013 Disney dropped a new trailer for the highly anticipated sequel.\n\nCheck it out!\n\n
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
Thoughts on the new characters? Who are you most excited to meet?<\/h2>","post_title":"New 'Frozen 2' Trailer Arrives Just in Time to Welcome Autumn","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"new-frozen-2-trailer-arrives-just-in-time-to-welcome-autumn","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-09-30 17:55:05","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-01 00:55:05","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53603","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"jnews_block_5"};
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Now in retrospect, do you agree with what Disney predicted in 2013? Was Frozen the greatest Disney animated event since The Lion King? Do you believe we're still in the Disney Revival with Frozen 2? <\/em><\/h3>\n","post_title":"[FROZEMBER] The 'Frozen' Phenomenon","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozember-the-frozen-phenomenon","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-06 07:07:47","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-06 14:07:47","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53922","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54598,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-30 16:27:46","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-30 23:27:46","post_content":"The launch of Disney+ on November 12 is now less than two weeks away. Earlier today, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusives to the streaming platform.\n\nPixar IRL<\/strong><\/em> (or, \"in real life\") is a short-form series that will bring the beloved characters of Pixar to reality in the real world. If you're picturing live-action remakes, you'd be mistaken. These moments will be brought to life out and about among unsuspecting citizens, somewhat of a prank show turned on its head. Take a look.\n\n
Will you watch this new Pixar content?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Pixar Reveals Line-Up of Original Programming for Disney+","post_excerpt":"With the launch of Disney+ on November 12 now less than 2 weeks away, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusive to the streaming platform.","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"pixar-reveals-line-up-of-original-programming-for-disney","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-01 16:56:54","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-01 23:56:54","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54596,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-28 17:46:58","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:46:58","post_content":"Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>swept the globe by storm earlier this year<\/a> and recently arrived on home video<\/a>. The film re-sparked a multitude of emotions and conversations<\/a> in its audiences as love poured out once more for arguably Pixar's most beloved franchise. Toy Story <\/em>is special, not only for the milestones it represents as Pixar's first feature and the world's first full-length computer-animated film, but also for what its themes and characters mean to its now multiple generations of viewers. Among the most prominent of observable narratives is Woody's, a character whose motivations, flaws, and changes become more complex with each passing Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>volume, whose arc is fascinating to study.\n\nMany, myself included, questioned if\u00a0Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>was necessary when it was first announced<\/a> in 2015. Toy Story 3, <\/em>released in 2010, felt like such a perfect finale, and within the context of its predecessors, allowed the whole series to function as an admirable trilogy. In nearly every category, Toy Story 3\u00a0<\/em>feels inherently like a bookend. Its opening fantasy sequence calls back the opening of Toy Story<\/em> with Andy's playtime. Its final shot (the iconic blue sky and fluffy clouds) is the first film's first shot. It has the cinematic mechanics of a perfect ending. If\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> was going to prove itself worthy, it needed to do that same legwork. As we're about to explore, it does.\n\n
\n
The Golden Rule of Pixar Sequels<\/h2>\nPixar's justification for sequels is relayed in Charles Solomon's book The Toy Story Films: An Animated Journey<\/em> (published in 2012, before Toy Story 4<\/em> was conceived). Solomon shares how Pixar filmmakers always want a sequel to feel as if it's truly the next chapter of a bigger story that the animators were trying to tell all along. A Pixar sequel should feel as if the story of the series is mapped out from the beginning, even though it isn't.\n\nThat goal works a charm in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a simple move from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> laying out a vital foundation for what was to follow, even if it didn't realize it at the time. Bo Peep was excluded from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, with director Lee Unkrich sharing in the film's bonus material that, as great of a character as she was, it didn't make sense that she would still be in the picture after all those years. Firstly, she was a lamp fixture, not a toy, but more importantly, she never belonged to Andy. She always belonged to his sister, Molly, and it didn't service the story for Andy to have kept her with his other toys as he grew up. Unkrich did state that one of his regrets of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was not featuring Bo in the opening fantasy scene, though perhaps her exclusion here was unknowingly necessary for her re-introduction in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> to pack the punch that it does.\n\n
\n\nUpon seeing\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a friend, he remarked, \"Wow, they really planned all that out well. Not having Bo Peep in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was so smart with what they wanted to do with her in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>.\" And therein I realized that Pixar had achieved its own gold standard:\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> felt like a strategic chapter in a grander story, and therefore had<\/em> to happen to complete the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>narrative.\n\nGetting back to Woody, though, the change that occurs through him in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> is reflected through language. It is the language more than anything that presents\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> as the bookend to\u00a0Toy Story<\/em>, with two key phrases coming to have new meaning: \"being there\" and \"lost toy.\"\n\n
\n
\"Being There\"<\/h2>\nIn\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> during the staff meeting, Woody declares that the toys' job \"isn't about being played with, it's about being there for Andy when he needs us.\" More than anything, that's Woody's priority, and he longs for everyone else to prioritize that, too. There's nothing wrong with that. That should<\/em> be his priority during that stage of his life. He's Andy's toy. Therefore, his job is to be there for Andy.\n\nThroughout\u00a0Toy Story 2<\/em>, this mantra remains the same. At the beginning of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, despite nearly a decade passing and Andy being a teenager about to leave for college, this is still Woody's priority, with that same language being used. In a similar staff meeting (albeit with much less toys, now that Andy is older), Woody echoes, \"This job isn't about being played with, it's about\u2014\" \"\u2014Being there for Andy. We know.\" Jessie interrupts him, clearly having heard this speech before. Woody, perhaps naively, still longs with everything inside of him to be there for Andy.\n\n
\n\nAt the end of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, this phrase and that language comes to have completely new meaning for Woody, as scriptwriter Michael Arndt shares in the book The Art of Toy Story 3<\/em>. Arndt takes us back to that moment: Woody inside Andy's college box, ready to leave the other toys behind. As Andy prepares to say goodbye to his childhood bedroom, his mother steps into the room and becomes emotional at the sight of the room packed up and empty, the ghost of her son's formative years vanished. Andy embraces her, and she implores, \"I just wish I could always be with you.\" Andy replies, \"You will be.\" In that instant, Woody makes a revelation. His entire purpose shifts. Andy's mom will always \"be there\" for Andy, even if she's not physically in the same space as him. And therefore, so can Woody. He doesn't have to go to college with Andy to be there for Andy. This is what drives Woody to switch boxes and go to Bonnie's with the rest of the toys. This life-changing choice is gloriously affirmed for Woody in a way he never thought possible: hearing it directly from Andy himself. As Andy gives Woody to Bonnie, he shares, \"Woody has been my pal for as long as I can remember. He's brave, like a cowboy should be. And kind and smart. But the thing that makes Woody special is he'll never give up on you, ever. He'll be there<\/em> for you, no matter what.\" Andy moves on. And therefore, so can Woody.\n\nOr, so we think. From that point forward, Woody's purpose changes, as he states to Forky in Toy Story 4<\/em>: his job is to \"be there for Bonnie.\" However, his change of ownership is still something Woody is getting used to. He hasn't quite moved on from Andy, even slipping in his explanation to Forky by using Andy's name first before correcting himself. Even though Woody made a huge decision, he's having a hard time accepting the reality of change around him. This is understandable and even expected, given the strong connection Andy and Woody had.\n\nWoody was there for Andy. Now it's his job to be there for Bonnie. But does that make sense? This is the question Woody berates himself for even thinking. It's all but blasphemy to his worldview to wonder if his loyalty to his kid is anything less than permanent. We'll explore how he confronts that internal dialogue a bit later.\n\n
\n
\"Lost Toy\"<\/h2>\nThe other consistent, repeated dialogue that gives us a lot of insight toward Woody's arc is the idea of being a \"lost toy.\" Beginning in\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> and continuing forward, this is the language used to describe a toy misplaced by their owner, and thus doomed to an eternity of unfulfilled purpose, of empty desire. As Andy's mom drives away from the gas station and Woody and Buzz are left at the pump, Woody cries in despair, \"I'm lost! Oh, I'm a lost toy!\" This is his greatest fear. This is his nightmare realized.\n\nIn\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, though, this concept is turned on its head. Bo Peep shows Woody a very different perspective of the idea of a lost toy. For her, being a lost toy is not a woeful product of circumstance, it's a choice she's made \u2014 and that she's proud of.\n\nBo Peep learned that her purpose wasn't as narrow of a concept as she once believed. As \"The Nerdwriter\" observed in a recent YouTube video<\/a>, even\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>'s cinematography tries to send us messages about Woody's worldview in contrast to Bo's newfound perspective. In back-to-back cuts within the same scene, an angle focusing on Bo Peep has a bokeh, blurred background, while the same moment angled toward Woody has a stark, in-focus background, symbolizing her openness to organic decisions and embracing change as opposed to his more plan-oriented, rigid mindset at that point in the story.\n\n
\n\nThat's not to say that Woody is completely static in the first three films. In many ways, he's changed quite a lot. He's grown. For starters, in\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>he does everything in his power to be his kid's favorite toy at all costs, even if it means throwing a new favorite toy out of a window. In Toy Story 4<\/em>, he does everything to protect his kid's new favorite toy, even if it's not him and even if it means throwing himself<\/em> out of a window. Woody has learned to be selfless. He doesn't get it right all the time, but his primary motivation is meeting the needs of others rather than himself. That will be key later.\n\nIn Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody feels a pull (a call, some might even say) toward something different, but because this contradicts so fundamentally with everything he's believed for his entire life, he has difficulty 1.) acknowledging that the thought is something he even has, and 2.) moving forward toward taking action on it.\n\n
\n
Woody Leaves<\/h2>\nUltimately, Woody decides to leave Bonnie's toys \u2014 his family \u2014 to be with Bo Peep and help carnival toys get adopted by kids... In essence, to be a lost toy. What was once his greatest crisis is where he finds his fulfilled purpose. That purpose has transitioned from \"being there for Andy\" to \"being there for his kid\" to finally \"being there for all kids.\" This fluidity of his life's pursuit shows tremendous growth in Woody as an individual and as a character in a way that is instantly applicable in considering what each of us devotes our lives toward achieving.\n\nIt's easy to disqualify Woody's decision. It's understandable and even logical to at first claim it's unwise. Leaving a child to live a life of your own was villainized in Toy Story 2. <\/em>Wasn't the point of that movie was Woody learned NOT to run away from his kid? Woody was pitted as unreasonable when he wanted to leave the other toys to go to college in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>. Wasn't the take-away there, as sung in the Oscar-winning end-credits song, that \"we belong together\"?\n\nThe difference in those circumstances, though, is that in both cases Woody would've been running toward an empty life by abandoning his kid. The museum in Japan. A box in Andy's dorm room. The common factor in both scenarios is an earnestness to choose the path that leads toward meeting someone else's needs vs. satisfying his own. As much as Woody might wish Bonnie needed him, she simply doesn't anymore. She's all but discarded him. Lotso hints at it toward the climax of Toy Story 3<\/em> and Forky brings it to the forefront in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>: truth is in the eye of the beholder, and that means toys and trash might be interchangeable depending on which judge is making the verdict. To Bonnie, Woody has, sadly, become trash. Staying with her serves no purpose. It would be selfish in comparison to the opportunity of his other decision.\n\n
\n\nHere's where we surprisingly find immense value in a place I'd never expect it to be: the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>short films and television specials released 2011-2014. This collection of short-form content brought us some fun diversions in the moment, but ultimately didn't change anything major within the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>universe. Now, though, this extra media shows us something very important: Bonnie, once, truly loved Woody. This is fascinating.\n\nIf we pay close attention to the seasons within these mini-sequels, we notice two separate winter breaks for Bonnie. If\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> concluded at the beginning of a school year, there are two winters during the shorts, and\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> begins at the advent of another new school year, we can assume that the time elapsed between\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>3\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>4<\/em> is at least two years, at a minimum. This puts some longevity on what, to a viewer watching just the feature films consecutively, might seem to be hardly any passage of time.\n\nWhat's more, if the viewer makes the jump from Toy Story 3<\/em> immediately into\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody isn't really shown as being loved by Bonnie. Sure, we get the sequence when she inadvertently takes him home from Sunnyside for playtime in Toy Story 3<\/em>, but that was before we knew he would be her toy at the end. Yes, she plays with him briefly in the opening montage of\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, but quickly in the next scene she chooses to leave him in her closet.\n\nBut in the shorts and TV specials, we see her treating him as equal as any other toy. She brings him when she goes over to friends' houses. She takes him on car trips. She loves him. It's this love that's absent if we skip quickly from Toy Story 3<\/em> to\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Bonnie completely devalued what Andy told her when he gave her Woody. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Woody's torn decision to go with Bo or stay with Bonnie is based only on a misguided concept of loyalty rather than any substantial relationship.\n\n
\n\nSo Woody leaves. Finally, after years of processing who he is, why he's here, and where he belongs in this world, he acknowledges and accepts something he's never been able to before: that the answers to those questions change as time passes. There isn't one concrete definition for who a person is. Life is more fluid than that. And having made his decision and said goodbye to the toys who have been his family for decades, Woody moves on. As Bonnie's family's RV pulls away and Buzz and Woody share one last look, a familiar riff of music inhabits Randy Newman's score \u2014 the exact same cue that played when Woody appeared onscreen for the very first time in 1995. It seems this is a bookend, after all.","post_title":"[OPINION] Woody \u2014 The Character Arc of Pixar's Most Iconic Hero","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"opinion-woody-the-character-arc-of-pixars-most-iconic-hero","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-31 14:19:33","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-31 21:19:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53532","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54529,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-21 14:37:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-21 21:37:43","post_content":"It's been no secret, even from the first teaser last winter, that Frozen 2<\/em> <\/strong>will be epic. If nothing else, the Roman numerals in all the marketing let us know this is going to be a classy affair.\n\nFour new posters released from Disney today continue to highlight the adventurous scope and impressive scale of the sequel, hinting at perhaps a darker, more intricate tale than its predecessor.\n\nOne thing is for sure: WE. CAN'T. WAIT.\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThere's just one month left until Frozen 2 <\/em>debuts in theaters November 22, 2019, directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.\n
Which of these new posters is your favorite?<\/h2>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"'Frozen 2' Character Posters Foreshadow Epic Scale","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozen-2-character-posters-foreshadow-epic-scale","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:52:40","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:52:40","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53826","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54520,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-10 19:17:53","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-11 02:17:53","post_content":"\"In times of old, the world was full of wonder and magic, but times change.\"\n\nThese words herald the arrival of Pixar's newest film,\u00a0Onward<\/em><\/strong>, in theaters March 6th, 2020, from director Dan Scanlon (Monsters University<\/em>). The movie stars Chris Pratt and Tom Holland as elf brothers, living in an enchanted realm like the kind we'd typically see in a medieval story but brought forward into the present day. Check out the full trailer below!\n\n
What was your favorite moment from the Onward<\/em> trailer?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Trailer Premiereth for Pixar's 'Onward' Starring Chris Pratt and Tom Holland","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trailer-premiereth-for-pixars-onward-starring-chris-pratt-and-tom-holland","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:38:13","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:38:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53741","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54517,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-07 20:01:55","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-08 03:01:55","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nI'm a Bob Iger stan. Or, at least, I'm a Bob Iger Twitter stan.\n\nI can't help it. Getting push notifications for his tweets is like Christmas morning each time he takes to the Internet. Posts typically arrive with Iger giddy about a new project, sometimes becoming confused with the subtleties of Twitter. One time he posted about Lucasfilm head Kathy Kennedy and mistakenly tagged a Kennedy parody account. This year on the anniversary of his being named Disney CEO, he tweeted about himself in the third person. Sometimes \u2013\u2013 these are my personal favorite \u2013\u2013 he'll chime in on Disney rumors or criticism with sarcasm, such as when he rebuked Captain Marvel<\/em> naysayers by claiming Disney would build \"a Captain Marvel<\/em> land with 50 Captain Marvel<\/em> attractions, plus Captain Marvel<\/em> cruise ships, hotels, and parades.\" HE. IS. WORTH. THE. FOLLOW. GO. FOLLOW. HIM.\n\nAnyway, these remarks (both in tone and in typo errors) feel out of place for the otherwise professional, businesslike stance Iger takes nearly everywhere else he publicly communicates. For the leader of a major corporation, Iger's tweets humanize him and remind us that he's a real person with, apparently, quite an offbeat personality that doesn't often come across in interviews. The same revelatory experience is found in Iger's new book, The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of The Walt Disney Company. <\/em>Curiously published from Random House rather than Disney Editions, the book pairs legends from his Disney tenure with practical leadership advice. This goes all the way back to 1974, when Iger began his first job with ABC. Many times throughout the book, Iger writes directly to the reader with wisdom relating not just to the business world, but to professional relationships, work\/life balance, friendships in the workplace, and other topics. The purpose is clearly to impart wisdom from major career moments rather than be a biography, and the extrapolation of proverbial business lessons is a large part of the narrative here.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThe book reads as surprisingly candid, with Iger not beating around the bush at any moment. He discusses with minimal secrecy the security measures of a potential Walt Disney World terrorist attack. He talks at length about the muddled reputation Roy E. Disney carried, marred by a rosy public-facing image the company projected. He openly shares the exit of former CEO Michael Eisner, a tale Iger claims was partially falsely reported in the widespread book Disney War<\/em>. He's very direct in discussing the flaws of his present and prior colleagues and supervisors, again pointing those attributes back to a value the person did or didn't exemplify in an attempt to illustrate a point to the reader.\n\nAt the same time, though, he's always fair (or, at least, appears to be, having no way to verify without knowing the subjects personally). Just as directly as he calls out weaknesses, he acknowledges his own mistakes too, and he equally takes time to build upon others' strengths. His extensive sharing about the friendship he shared with Steve Jobs is particularly touching and revelatory. It's within this realm that the true merit of Iger's book is found, at least for the Disney fan: Here we find stories we've never heard this side of before (deleted scenes, if you will), events that we've only previously known through the lens of facts-only news articles or misconstrued rumors. Here, from the direct source, we have missing moments from Disney history suddenly and delightfully revealed in incredible detail.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nDisney usually waits a while to share its history. Though there's the usual fare of behind-the-scenes footage with each new home video release, these still feel relatively sugar-coated because the product is still new on the market. It's not until a project establishes itself as a time-tested classic (\/until there's no danger of it losing money) that we might hear the real<\/em> story of what went down \u2013\u2013 the hurdles, the obstacles, the production challenges, the difficult conversations, the creative disagreements. It wasn't until the Platinum Edition DVD collection began in 2001 that we really heard Disney share the full scope of production stories from its Renaissance-era films of the '90s. It's 2019 and we're just getting scraps of tales from the making of 2009's The Princess and the Frog<\/em> as its tenth-anniversary festivities set in motion. Likewise, Bob Iger has been CEO of The Walt Disney Company since 2005, and while we know the basics of what he's accomplished, we haven't really heard the full extent of these important moments in Disney history... (dramatic music) until now.\n\nWith Iger's reign largely anchoring on acquisitions of existing brands into the Disney fold, each of these purchases takes a significant portion of the book, beginning with Pixar and continuing with Marvel and Lucasfilm, and even touching on Fox at the end. We find out what Steve Jobs told Iger just 30 minutes before the Pixar purchase was announced that could have reversed the deal. We hear what convinced Marvel's prior owner to consider selling. We discover what happened behind the scenes with George Lucas during the production of The Force Awakens<\/em>. Iger's business acumen throughout keeps this prose from being overly gossipy \u2013\u2013 it always has a point, and (again, seemingly) always shares a fair perspective without being skewed or opinionated.\n\nFor a Disney fan, this reads as a soap opera with some sage advice sprinkled throughout. For those seeking a leadership-oriented book, this reads as an excellent delve into the mind of one of the world's most prominent leaders, offering helpful anecdotes guiding through his intricate thought processes. The \"life lessons\" aspect of the book might be a bit tangential at times, but this is forgiven by Iger's obvious passion for his career and his clear intent to make this book worthwhile for those who read it. Like his Twitter profile sometimes lets slip, Bob Iger loves what he does. And he equally loves sharing it. We have no choice but to stan.\n\n \n\nPurchase<\/a>","post_title":"[BOOK REVIEW] 'Ride of a Lifetime' is Disney CEO Bob Iger's Iconic Twitter Novelized","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"book-review-ride-of-a-lifetime-is-disney-ceo-bob-igers-iconic-twitter-novelized","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:30:57","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:30:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53709","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54423,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-09-23 14:53:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-09-23 21:53:43","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nWith official first day of fall \u2013\u2013 and now less than two months away from the release of Frozen 2 \u2013\u2013 Disney dropped a new trailer for the highly anticipated sequel.\n\nCheck it out!\n\n
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
Thoughts on the new characters? Who are you most excited to meet?<\/h2>","post_title":"New 'Frozen 2' Trailer Arrives Just in Time to Welcome Autumn","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"new-frozen-2-trailer-arrives-just-in-time-to-welcome-autumn","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-09-30 17:55:05","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-01 00:55:05","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53603","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"jnews_block_5"};
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Now in retrospect, do you agree with what Disney predicted in 2013? Was Frozen the greatest Disney animated event since The Lion King? Do you believe we're still in the Disney Revival with Frozen 2? <\/em><\/h3>\n","post_title":"[FROZEMBER] The 'Frozen' Phenomenon","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozember-the-frozen-phenomenon","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-06 07:07:47","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-06 14:07:47","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53922","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54598,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-30 16:27:46","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-30 23:27:46","post_content":"The launch of Disney+ on November 12 is now less than two weeks away. Earlier today, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusives to the streaming platform.\n\nPixar IRL<\/strong><\/em> (or, \"in real life\") is a short-form series that will bring the beloved characters of Pixar to reality in the real world. If you're picturing live-action remakes, you'd be mistaken. These moments will be brought to life out and about among unsuspecting citizens, somewhat of a prank show turned on its head. Take a look.\n\n
Will you watch this new Pixar content?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Pixar Reveals Line-Up of Original Programming for Disney+","post_excerpt":"With the launch of Disney+ on November 12 now less than 2 weeks away, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusive to the streaming platform.","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"pixar-reveals-line-up-of-original-programming-for-disney","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-01 16:56:54","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-01 23:56:54","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54596,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-28 17:46:58","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:46:58","post_content":"Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>swept the globe by storm earlier this year<\/a> and recently arrived on home video<\/a>. The film re-sparked a multitude of emotions and conversations<\/a> in its audiences as love poured out once more for arguably Pixar's most beloved franchise. Toy Story <\/em>is special, not only for the milestones it represents as Pixar's first feature and the world's first full-length computer-animated film, but also for what its themes and characters mean to its now multiple generations of viewers. Among the most prominent of observable narratives is Woody's, a character whose motivations, flaws, and changes become more complex with each passing Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>volume, whose arc is fascinating to study.\n\nMany, myself included, questioned if\u00a0Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>was necessary when it was first announced<\/a> in 2015. Toy Story 3, <\/em>released in 2010, felt like such a perfect finale, and within the context of its predecessors, allowed the whole series to function as an admirable trilogy. In nearly every category, Toy Story 3\u00a0<\/em>feels inherently like a bookend. Its opening fantasy sequence calls back the opening of Toy Story<\/em> with Andy's playtime. Its final shot (the iconic blue sky and fluffy clouds) is the first film's first shot. It has the cinematic mechanics of a perfect ending. If\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> was going to prove itself worthy, it needed to do that same legwork. As we're about to explore, it does.\n\n
\n
The Golden Rule of Pixar Sequels<\/h2>\nPixar's justification for sequels is relayed in Charles Solomon's book The Toy Story Films: An Animated Journey<\/em> (published in 2012, before Toy Story 4<\/em> was conceived). Solomon shares how Pixar filmmakers always want a sequel to feel as if it's truly the next chapter of a bigger story that the animators were trying to tell all along. A Pixar sequel should feel as if the story of the series is mapped out from the beginning, even though it isn't.\n\nThat goal works a charm in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a simple move from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> laying out a vital foundation for what was to follow, even if it didn't realize it at the time. Bo Peep was excluded from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, with director Lee Unkrich sharing in the film's bonus material that, as great of a character as she was, it didn't make sense that she would still be in the picture after all those years. Firstly, she was a lamp fixture, not a toy, but more importantly, she never belonged to Andy. She always belonged to his sister, Molly, and it didn't service the story for Andy to have kept her with his other toys as he grew up. Unkrich did state that one of his regrets of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was not featuring Bo in the opening fantasy scene, though perhaps her exclusion here was unknowingly necessary for her re-introduction in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> to pack the punch that it does.\n\n
\n\nUpon seeing\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a friend, he remarked, \"Wow, they really planned all that out well. Not having Bo Peep in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was so smart with what they wanted to do with her in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>.\" And therein I realized that Pixar had achieved its own gold standard:\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> felt like a strategic chapter in a grander story, and therefore had<\/em> to happen to complete the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>narrative.\n\nGetting back to Woody, though, the change that occurs through him in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> is reflected through language. It is the language more than anything that presents\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> as the bookend to\u00a0Toy Story<\/em>, with two key phrases coming to have new meaning: \"being there\" and \"lost toy.\"\n\n
\n
\"Being There\"<\/h2>\nIn\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> during the staff meeting, Woody declares that the toys' job \"isn't about being played with, it's about being there for Andy when he needs us.\" More than anything, that's Woody's priority, and he longs for everyone else to prioritize that, too. There's nothing wrong with that. That should<\/em> be his priority during that stage of his life. He's Andy's toy. Therefore, his job is to be there for Andy.\n\nThroughout\u00a0Toy Story 2<\/em>, this mantra remains the same. At the beginning of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, despite nearly a decade passing and Andy being a teenager about to leave for college, this is still Woody's priority, with that same language being used. In a similar staff meeting (albeit with much less toys, now that Andy is older), Woody echoes, \"This job isn't about being played with, it's about\u2014\" \"\u2014Being there for Andy. We know.\" Jessie interrupts him, clearly having heard this speech before. Woody, perhaps naively, still longs with everything inside of him to be there for Andy.\n\n
\n\nAt the end of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, this phrase and that language comes to have completely new meaning for Woody, as scriptwriter Michael Arndt shares in the book The Art of Toy Story 3<\/em>. Arndt takes us back to that moment: Woody inside Andy's college box, ready to leave the other toys behind. As Andy prepares to say goodbye to his childhood bedroom, his mother steps into the room and becomes emotional at the sight of the room packed up and empty, the ghost of her son's formative years vanished. Andy embraces her, and she implores, \"I just wish I could always be with you.\" Andy replies, \"You will be.\" In that instant, Woody makes a revelation. His entire purpose shifts. Andy's mom will always \"be there\" for Andy, even if she's not physically in the same space as him. And therefore, so can Woody. He doesn't have to go to college with Andy to be there for Andy. This is what drives Woody to switch boxes and go to Bonnie's with the rest of the toys. This life-changing choice is gloriously affirmed for Woody in a way he never thought possible: hearing it directly from Andy himself. As Andy gives Woody to Bonnie, he shares, \"Woody has been my pal for as long as I can remember. He's brave, like a cowboy should be. And kind and smart. But the thing that makes Woody special is he'll never give up on you, ever. He'll be there<\/em> for you, no matter what.\" Andy moves on. And therefore, so can Woody.\n\nOr, so we think. From that point forward, Woody's purpose changes, as he states to Forky in Toy Story 4<\/em>: his job is to \"be there for Bonnie.\" However, his change of ownership is still something Woody is getting used to. He hasn't quite moved on from Andy, even slipping in his explanation to Forky by using Andy's name first before correcting himself. Even though Woody made a huge decision, he's having a hard time accepting the reality of change around him. This is understandable and even expected, given the strong connection Andy and Woody had.\n\nWoody was there for Andy. Now it's his job to be there for Bonnie. But does that make sense? This is the question Woody berates himself for even thinking. It's all but blasphemy to his worldview to wonder if his loyalty to his kid is anything less than permanent. We'll explore how he confronts that internal dialogue a bit later.\n\n
\n
\"Lost Toy\"<\/h2>\nThe other consistent, repeated dialogue that gives us a lot of insight toward Woody's arc is the idea of being a \"lost toy.\" Beginning in\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> and continuing forward, this is the language used to describe a toy misplaced by their owner, and thus doomed to an eternity of unfulfilled purpose, of empty desire. As Andy's mom drives away from the gas station and Woody and Buzz are left at the pump, Woody cries in despair, \"I'm lost! Oh, I'm a lost toy!\" This is his greatest fear. This is his nightmare realized.\n\nIn\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, though, this concept is turned on its head. Bo Peep shows Woody a very different perspective of the idea of a lost toy. For her, being a lost toy is not a woeful product of circumstance, it's a choice she's made \u2014 and that she's proud of.\n\nBo Peep learned that her purpose wasn't as narrow of a concept as she once believed. As \"The Nerdwriter\" observed in a recent YouTube video<\/a>, even\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>'s cinematography tries to send us messages about Woody's worldview in contrast to Bo's newfound perspective. In back-to-back cuts within the same scene, an angle focusing on Bo Peep has a bokeh, blurred background, while the same moment angled toward Woody has a stark, in-focus background, symbolizing her openness to organic decisions and embracing change as opposed to his more plan-oriented, rigid mindset at that point in the story.\n\n
\n\nThat's not to say that Woody is completely static in the first three films. In many ways, he's changed quite a lot. He's grown. For starters, in\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>he does everything in his power to be his kid's favorite toy at all costs, even if it means throwing a new favorite toy out of a window. In Toy Story 4<\/em>, he does everything to protect his kid's new favorite toy, even if it's not him and even if it means throwing himself<\/em> out of a window. Woody has learned to be selfless. He doesn't get it right all the time, but his primary motivation is meeting the needs of others rather than himself. That will be key later.\n\nIn Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody feels a pull (a call, some might even say) toward something different, but because this contradicts so fundamentally with everything he's believed for his entire life, he has difficulty 1.) acknowledging that the thought is something he even has, and 2.) moving forward toward taking action on it.\n\n
\n
Woody Leaves<\/h2>\nUltimately, Woody decides to leave Bonnie's toys \u2014 his family \u2014 to be with Bo Peep and help carnival toys get adopted by kids... In essence, to be a lost toy. What was once his greatest crisis is where he finds his fulfilled purpose. That purpose has transitioned from \"being there for Andy\" to \"being there for his kid\" to finally \"being there for all kids.\" This fluidity of his life's pursuit shows tremendous growth in Woody as an individual and as a character in a way that is instantly applicable in considering what each of us devotes our lives toward achieving.\n\nIt's easy to disqualify Woody's decision. It's understandable and even logical to at first claim it's unwise. Leaving a child to live a life of your own was villainized in Toy Story 2. <\/em>Wasn't the point of that movie was Woody learned NOT to run away from his kid? Woody was pitted as unreasonable when he wanted to leave the other toys to go to college in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>. Wasn't the take-away there, as sung in the Oscar-winning end-credits song, that \"we belong together\"?\n\nThe difference in those circumstances, though, is that in both cases Woody would've been running toward an empty life by abandoning his kid. The museum in Japan. A box in Andy's dorm room. The common factor in both scenarios is an earnestness to choose the path that leads toward meeting someone else's needs vs. satisfying his own. As much as Woody might wish Bonnie needed him, she simply doesn't anymore. She's all but discarded him. Lotso hints at it toward the climax of Toy Story 3<\/em> and Forky brings it to the forefront in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>: truth is in the eye of the beholder, and that means toys and trash might be interchangeable depending on which judge is making the verdict. To Bonnie, Woody has, sadly, become trash. Staying with her serves no purpose. It would be selfish in comparison to the opportunity of his other decision.\n\n
\n\nHere's where we surprisingly find immense value in a place I'd never expect it to be: the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>short films and television specials released 2011-2014. This collection of short-form content brought us some fun diversions in the moment, but ultimately didn't change anything major within the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>universe. Now, though, this extra media shows us something very important: Bonnie, once, truly loved Woody. This is fascinating.\n\nIf we pay close attention to the seasons within these mini-sequels, we notice two separate winter breaks for Bonnie. If\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> concluded at the beginning of a school year, there are two winters during the shorts, and\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> begins at the advent of another new school year, we can assume that the time elapsed between\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>3\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>4<\/em> is at least two years, at a minimum. This puts some longevity on what, to a viewer watching just the feature films consecutively, might seem to be hardly any passage of time.\n\nWhat's more, if the viewer makes the jump from Toy Story 3<\/em> immediately into\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody isn't really shown as being loved by Bonnie. Sure, we get the sequence when she inadvertently takes him home from Sunnyside for playtime in Toy Story 3<\/em>, but that was before we knew he would be her toy at the end. Yes, she plays with him briefly in the opening montage of\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, but quickly in the next scene she chooses to leave him in her closet.\n\nBut in the shorts and TV specials, we see her treating him as equal as any other toy. She brings him when she goes over to friends' houses. She takes him on car trips. She loves him. It's this love that's absent if we skip quickly from Toy Story 3<\/em> to\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Bonnie completely devalued what Andy told her when he gave her Woody. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Woody's torn decision to go with Bo or stay with Bonnie is based only on a misguided concept of loyalty rather than any substantial relationship.\n\n
\n\nSo Woody leaves. Finally, after years of processing who he is, why he's here, and where he belongs in this world, he acknowledges and accepts something he's never been able to before: that the answers to those questions change as time passes. There isn't one concrete definition for who a person is. Life is more fluid than that. And having made his decision and said goodbye to the toys who have been his family for decades, Woody moves on. As Bonnie's family's RV pulls away and Buzz and Woody share one last look, a familiar riff of music inhabits Randy Newman's score \u2014 the exact same cue that played when Woody appeared onscreen for the very first time in 1995. It seems this is a bookend, after all.","post_title":"[OPINION] Woody \u2014 The Character Arc of Pixar's Most Iconic Hero","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"opinion-woody-the-character-arc-of-pixars-most-iconic-hero","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-31 14:19:33","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-31 21:19:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53532","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54529,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-21 14:37:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-21 21:37:43","post_content":"It's been no secret, even from the first teaser last winter, that Frozen 2<\/em> <\/strong>will be epic. If nothing else, the Roman numerals in all the marketing let us know this is going to be a classy affair.\n\nFour new posters released from Disney today continue to highlight the adventurous scope and impressive scale of the sequel, hinting at perhaps a darker, more intricate tale than its predecessor.\n\nOne thing is for sure: WE. CAN'T. WAIT.\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThere's just one month left until Frozen 2 <\/em>debuts in theaters November 22, 2019, directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.\n
Which of these new posters is your favorite?<\/h2>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"'Frozen 2' Character Posters Foreshadow Epic Scale","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozen-2-character-posters-foreshadow-epic-scale","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:52:40","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:52:40","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53826","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54520,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-10 19:17:53","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-11 02:17:53","post_content":"\"In times of old, the world was full of wonder and magic, but times change.\"\n\nThese words herald the arrival of Pixar's newest film,\u00a0Onward<\/em><\/strong>, in theaters March 6th, 2020, from director Dan Scanlon (Monsters University<\/em>). The movie stars Chris Pratt and Tom Holland as elf brothers, living in an enchanted realm like the kind we'd typically see in a medieval story but brought forward into the present day. Check out the full trailer below!\n\n
What was your favorite moment from the Onward<\/em> trailer?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Trailer Premiereth for Pixar's 'Onward' Starring Chris Pratt and Tom Holland","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trailer-premiereth-for-pixars-onward-starring-chris-pratt-and-tom-holland","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:38:13","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:38:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53741","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54517,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-07 20:01:55","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-08 03:01:55","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nI'm a Bob Iger stan. Or, at least, I'm a Bob Iger Twitter stan.\n\nI can't help it. Getting push notifications for his tweets is like Christmas morning each time he takes to the Internet. Posts typically arrive with Iger giddy about a new project, sometimes becoming confused with the subtleties of Twitter. One time he posted about Lucasfilm head Kathy Kennedy and mistakenly tagged a Kennedy parody account. This year on the anniversary of his being named Disney CEO, he tweeted about himself in the third person. Sometimes \u2013\u2013 these are my personal favorite \u2013\u2013 he'll chime in on Disney rumors or criticism with sarcasm, such as when he rebuked Captain Marvel<\/em> naysayers by claiming Disney would build \"a Captain Marvel<\/em> land with 50 Captain Marvel<\/em> attractions, plus Captain Marvel<\/em> cruise ships, hotels, and parades.\" HE. IS. WORTH. THE. FOLLOW. GO. FOLLOW. HIM.\n\nAnyway, these remarks (both in tone and in typo errors) feel out of place for the otherwise professional, businesslike stance Iger takes nearly everywhere else he publicly communicates. For the leader of a major corporation, Iger's tweets humanize him and remind us that he's a real person with, apparently, quite an offbeat personality that doesn't often come across in interviews. The same revelatory experience is found in Iger's new book, The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of The Walt Disney Company. <\/em>Curiously published from Random House rather than Disney Editions, the book pairs legends from his Disney tenure with practical leadership advice. This goes all the way back to 1974, when Iger began his first job with ABC. Many times throughout the book, Iger writes directly to the reader with wisdom relating not just to the business world, but to professional relationships, work\/life balance, friendships in the workplace, and other topics. The purpose is clearly to impart wisdom from major career moments rather than be a biography, and the extrapolation of proverbial business lessons is a large part of the narrative here.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThe book reads as surprisingly candid, with Iger not beating around the bush at any moment. He discusses with minimal secrecy the security measures of a potential Walt Disney World terrorist attack. He talks at length about the muddled reputation Roy E. Disney carried, marred by a rosy public-facing image the company projected. He openly shares the exit of former CEO Michael Eisner, a tale Iger claims was partially falsely reported in the widespread book Disney War<\/em>. He's very direct in discussing the flaws of his present and prior colleagues and supervisors, again pointing those attributes back to a value the person did or didn't exemplify in an attempt to illustrate a point to the reader.\n\nAt the same time, though, he's always fair (or, at least, appears to be, having no way to verify without knowing the subjects personally). Just as directly as he calls out weaknesses, he acknowledges his own mistakes too, and he equally takes time to build upon others' strengths. His extensive sharing about the friendship he shared with Steve Jobs is particularly touching and revelatory. It's within this realm that the true merit of Iger's book is found, at least for the Disney fan: Here we find stories we've never heard this side of before (deleted scenes, if you will), events that we've only previously known through the lens of facts-only news articles or misconstrued rumors. Here, from the direct source, we have missing moments from Disney history suddenly and delightfully revealed in incredible detail.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nDisney usually waits a while to share its history. Though there's the usual fare of behind-the-scenes footage with each new home video release, these still feel relatively sugar-coated because the product is still new on the market. It's not until a project establishes itself as a time-tested classic (\/until there's no danger of it losing money) that we might hear the real<\/em> story of what went down \u2013\u2013 the hurdles, the obstacles, the production challenges, the difficult conversations, the creative disagreements. It wasn't until the Platinum Edition DVD collection began in 2001 that we really heard Disney share the full scope of production stories from its Renaissance-era films of the '90s. It's 2019 and we're just getting scraps of tales from the making of 2009's The Princess and the Frog<\/em> as its tenth-anniversary festivities set in motion. Likewise, Bob Iger has been CEO of The Walt Disney Company since 2005, and while we know the basics of what he's accomplished, we haven't really heard the full extent of these important moments in Disney history... (dramatic music) until now.\n\nWith Iger's reign largely anchoring on acquisitions of existing brands into the Disney fold, each of these purchases takes a significant portion of the book, beginning with Pixar and continuing with Marvel and Lucasfilm, and even touching on Fox at the end. We find out what Steve Jobs told Iger just 30 minutes before the Pixar purchase was announced that could have reversed the deal. We hear what convinced Marvel's prior owner to consider selling. We discover what happened behind the scenes with George Lucas during the production of The Force Awakens<\/em>. Iger's business acumen throughout keeps this prose from being overly gossipy \u2013\u2013 it always has a point, and (again, seemingly) always shares a fair perspective without being skewed or opinionated.\n\nFor a Disney fan, this reads as a soap opera with some sage advice sprinkled throughout. For those seeking a leadership-oriented book, this reads as an excellent delve into the mind of one of the world's most prominent leaders, offering helpful anecdotes guiding through his intricate thought processes. The \"life lessons\" aspect of the book might be a bit tangential at times, but this is forgiven by Iger's obvious passion for his career and his clear intent to make this book worthwhile for those who read it. Like his Twitter profile sometimes lets slip, Bob Iger loves what he does. And he equally loves sharing it. We have no choice but to stan.\n\n \n\nPurchase<\/a>","post_title":"[BOOK REVIEW] 'Ride of a Lifetime' is Disney CEO Bob Iger's Iconic Twitter Novelized","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"book-review-ride-of-a-lifetime-is-disney-ceo-bob-igers-iconic-twitter-novelized","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:30:57","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:30:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53709","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54423,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-09-23 14:53:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-09-23 21:53:43","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nWith official first day of fall \u2013\u2013 and now less than two months away from the release of Frozen 2 \u2013\u2013 Disney dropped a new trailer for the highly anticipated sequel.\n\nCheck it out!\n\n
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t
Thoughts on the new characters? Who are you most excited to meet?<\/h2>","post_title":"New 'Frozen 2' Trailer Arrives Just in Time to Welcome Autumn","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"new-frozen-2-trailer-arrives-just-in-time-to-welcome-autumn","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-09-30 17:55:05","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-01 00:55:05","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53603","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"jnews_block_5"};
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Now in retrospect, do you agree with what Disney predicted in 2013? Was Frozen the greatest Disney animated event since The Lion King? Do you believe we're still in the Disney Revival with Frozen 2? <\/em><\/h3>\n","post_title":"[FROZEMBER] The 'Frozen' Phenomenon","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozember-the-frozen-phenomenon","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-06 07:07:47","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-06 14:07:47","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53922","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54598,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-30 16:27:46","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-30 23:27:46","post_content":"The launch of Disney+ on November 12 is now less than two weeks away. Earlier today, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusives to the streaming platform.\n\nPixar IRL<\/strong><\/em> (or, \"in real life\") is a short-form series that will bring the beloved characters of Pixar to reality in the real world. If you're picturing live-action remakes, you'd be mistaken. These moments will be brought to life out and about among unsuspecting citizens, somewhat of a prank show turned on its head. Take a look.\n\n
Will you watch this new Pixar content?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Pixar Reveals Line-Up of Original Programming for Disney+","post_excerpt":"With the launch of Disney+ on November 12 now less than 2 weeks away, Pixar unveiled a slate of original programming exclusive to the streaming platform.","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"pixar-reveals-line-up-of-original-programming-for-disney","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-11-01 16:56:54","post_modified_gmt":"2019-11-01 23:56:54","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54596,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-28 17:46:58","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:46:58","post_content":"Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>swept the globe by storm earlier this year<\/a> and recently arrived on home video<\/a>. The film re-sparked a multitude of emotions and conversations<\/a> in its audiences as love poured out once more for arguably Pixar's most beloved franchise. Toy Story <\/em>is special, not only for the milestones it represents as Pixar's first feature and the world's first full-length computer-animated film, but also for what its themes and characters mean to its now multiple generations of viewers. Among the most prominent of observable narratives is Woody's, a character whose motivations, flaws, and changes become more complex with each passing Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>volume, whose arc is fascinating to study.\n\nMany, myself included, questioned if\u00a0Toy Story 4\u00a0<\/em>was necessary when it was first announced<\/a> in 2015. Toy Story 3, <\/em>released in 2010, felt like such a perfect finale, and within the context of its predecessors, allowed the whole series to function as an admirable trilogy. In nearly every category, Toy Story 3\u00a0<\/em>feels inherently like a bookend. Its opening fantasy sequence calls back the opening of Toy Story<\/em> with Andy's playtime. Its final shot (the iconic blue sky and fluffy clouds) is the first film's first shot. It has the cinematic mechanics of a perfect ending. If\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> was going to prove itself worthy, it needed to do that same legwork. As we're about to explore, it does.\n\n
\n
The Golden Rule of Pixar Sequels<\/h2>\nPixar's justification for sequels is relayed in Charles Solomon's book The Toy Story Films: An Animated Journey<\/em> (published in 2012, before Toy Story 4<\/em> was conceived). Solomon shares how Pixar filmmakers always want a sequel to feel as if it's truly the next chapter of a bigger story that the animators were trying to tell all along. A Pixar sequel should feel as if the story of the series is mapped out from the beginning, even though it isn't.\n\nThat goal works a charm in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a simple move from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> laying out a vital foundation for what was to follow, even if it didn't realize it at the time. Bo Peep was excluded from\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, with director Lee Unkrich sharing in the film's bonus material that, as great of a character as she was, it didn't make sense that she would still be in the picture after all those years. Firstly, she was a lamp fixture, not a toy, but more importantly, she never belonged to Andy. She always belonged to his sister, Molly, and it didn't service the story for Andy to have kept her with his other toys as he grew up. Unkrich did state that one of his regrets of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was not featuring Bo in the opening fantasy scene, though perhaps her exclusion here was unknowingly necessary for her re-introduction in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> to pack the punch that it does.\n\n
\n\nUpon seeing\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> with a friend, he remarked, \"Wow, they really planned all that out well. Not having Bo Peep in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> was so smart with what they wanted to do with her in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>.\" And therein I realized that Pixar had achieved its own gold standard:\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> felt like a strategic chapter in a grander story, and therefore had<\/em> to happen to complete the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>narrative.\n\nGetting back to Woody, though, the change that occurs through him in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> is reflected through language. It is the language more than anything that presents\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> as the bookend to\u00a0Toy Story<\/em>, with two key phrases coming to have new meaning: \"being there\" and \"lost toy.\"\n\n
\n
\"Being There\"<\/h2>\nIn\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> during the staff meeting, Woody declares that the toys' job \"isn't about being played with, it's about being there for Andy when he needs us.\" More than anything, that's Woody's priority, and he longs for everyone else to prioritize that, too. There's nothing wrong with that. That should<\/em> be his priority during that stage of his life. He's Andy's toy. Therefore, his job is to be there for Andy.\n\nThroughout\u00a0Toy Story 2<\/em>, this mantra remains the same. At the beginning of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, despite nearly a decade passing and Andy being a teenager about to leave for college, this is still Woody's priority, with that same language being used. In a similar staff meeting (albeit with much less toys, now that Andy is older), Woody echoes, \"This job isn't about being played with, it's about\u2014\" \"\u2014Being there for Andy. We know.\" Jessie interrupts him, clearly having heard this speech before. Woody, perhaps naively, still longs with everything inside of him to be there for Andy.\n\n
\n\nAt the end of\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>, though, this phrase and that language comes to have completely new meaning for Woody, as scriptwriter Michael Arndt shares in the book The Art of Toy Story 3<\/em>. Arndt takes us back to that moment: Woody inside Andy's college box, ready to leave the other toys behind. As Andy prepares to say goodbye to his childhood bedroom, his mother steps into the room and becomes emotional at the sight of the room packed up and empty, the ghost of her son's formative years vanished. Andy embraces her, and she implores, \"I just wish I could always be with you.\" Andy replies, \"You will be.\" In that instant, Woody makes a revelation. His entire purpose shifts. Andy's mom will always \"be there\" for Andy, even if she's not physically in the same space as him. And therefore, so can Woody. He doesn't have to go to college with Andy to be there for Andy. This is what drives Woody to switch boxes and go to Bonnie's with the rest of the toys. This life-changing choice is gloriously affirmed for Woody in a way he never thought possible: hearing it directly from Andy himself. As Andy gives Woody to Bonnie, he shares, \"Woody has been my pal for as long as I can remember. He's brave, like a cowboy should be. And kind and smart. But the thing that makes Woody special is he'll never give up on you, ever. He'll be there<\/em> for you, no matter what.\" Andy moves on. And therefore, so can Woody.\n\nOr, so we think. From that point forward, Woody's purpose changes, as he states to Forky in Toy Story 4<\/em>: his job is to \"be there for Bonnie.\" However, his change of ownership is still something Woody is getting used to. He hasn't quite moved on from Andy, even slipping in his explanation to Forky by using Andy's name first before correcting himself. Even though Woody made a huge decision, he's having a hard time accepting the reality of change around him. This is understandable and even expected, given the strong connection Andy and Woody had.\n\nWoody was there for Andy. Now it's his job to be there for Bonnie. But does that make sense? This is the question Woody berates himself for even thinking. It's all but blasphemy to his worldview to wonder if his loyalty to his kid is anything less than permanent. We'll explore how he confronts that internal dialogue a bit later.\n\n
\n
\"Lost Toy\"<\/h2>\nThe other consistent, repeated dialogue that gives us a lot of insight toward Woody's arc is the idea of being a \"lost toy.\" Beginning in\u00a0Toy Story<\/em> and continuing forward, this is the language used to describe a toy misplaced by their owner, and thus doomed to an eternity of unfulfilled purpose, of empty desire. As Andy's mom drives away from the gas station and Woody and Buzz are left at the pump, Woody cries in despair, \"I'm lost! Oh, I'm a lost toy!\" This is his greatest fear. This is his nightmare realized.\n\nIn\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, though, this concept is turned on its head. Bo Peep shows Woody a very different perspective of the idea of a lost toy. For her, being a lost toy is not a woeful product of circumstance, it's a choice she's made \u2014 and that she's proud of.\n\nBo Peep learned that her purpose wasn't as narrow of a concept as she once believed. As \"The Nerdwriter\" observed in a recent YouTube video<\/a>, even\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>'s cinematography tries to send us messages about Woody's worldview in contrast to Bo's newfound perspective. In back-to-back cuts within the same scene, an angle focusing on Bo Peep has a bokeh, blurred background, while the same moment angled toward Woody has a stark, in-focus background, symbolizing her openness to organic decisions and embracing change as opposed to his more plan-oriented, rigid mindset at that point in the story.\n\n
\n\nThat's not to say that Woody is completely static in the first three films. In many ways, he's changed quite a lot. He's grown. For starters, in\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>he does everything in his power to be his kid's favorite toy at all costs, even if it means throwing a new favorite toy out of a window. In Toy Story 4<\/em>, he does everything to protect his kid's new favorite toy, even if it's not him and even if it means throwing himself<\/em> out of a window. Woody has learned to be selfless. He doesn't get it right all the time, but his primary motivation is meeting the needs of others rather than himself. That will be key later.\n\nIn Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody feels a pull (a call, some might even say) toward something different, but because this contradicts so fundamentally with everything he's believed for his entire life, he has difficulty 1.) acknowledging that the thought is something he even has, and 2.) moving forward toward taking action on it.\n\n
\n
Woody Leaves<\/h2>\nUltimately, Woody decides to leave Bonnie's toys \u2014 his family \u2014 to be with Bo Peep and help carnival toys get adopted by kids... In essence, to be a lost toy. What was once his greatest crisis is where he finds his fulfilled purpose. That purpose has transitioned from \"being there for Andy\" to \"being there for his kid\" to finally \"being there for all kids.\" This fluidity of his life's pursuit shows tremendous growth in Woody as an individual and as a character in a way that is instantly applicable in considering what each of us devotes our lives toward achieving.\n\nIt's easy to disqualify Woody's decision. It's understandable and even logical to at first claim it's unwise. Leaving a child to live a life of your own was villainized in Toy Story 2. <\/em>Wasn't the point of that movie was Woody learned NOT to run away from his kid? Woody was pitted as unreasonable when he wanted to leave the other toys to go to college in\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em>. Wasn't the take-away there, as sung in the Oscar-winning end-credits song, that \"we belong together\"?\n\nThe difference in those circumstances, though, is that in both cases Woody would've been running toward an empty life by abandoning his kid. The museum in Japan. A box in Andy's dorm room. The common factor in both scenarios is an earnestness to choose the path that leads toward meeting someone else's needs vs. satisfying his own. As much as Woody might wish Bonnie needed him, she simply doesn't anymore. She's all but discarded him. Lotso hints at it toward the climax of Toy Story 3<\/em> and Forky brings it to the forefront in\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>: truth is in the eye of the beholder, and that means toys and trash might be interchangeable depending on which judge is making the verdict. To Bonnie, Woody has, sadly, become trash. Staying with her serves no purpose. It would be selfish in comparison to the opportunity of his other decision.\n\n
\n\nHere's where we surprisingly find immense value in a place I'd never expect it to be: the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>short films and television specials released 2011-2014. This collection of short-form content brought us some fun diversions in the moment, but ultimately didn't change anything major within the\u00a0Toy Story\u00a0<\/em>universe. Now, though, this extra media shows us something very important: Bonnie, once, truly loved Woody. This is fascinating.\n\nIf we pay close attention to the seasons within these mini-sequels, we notice two separate winter breaks for Bonnie. If\u00a0Toy Story 3<\/em> concluded at the beginning of a school year, there are two winters during the shorts, and\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em> begins at the advent of another new school year, we can assume that the time elapsed between\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>3\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Toy Story <\/em>4<\/em> is at least two years, at a minimum. This puts some longevity on what, to a viewer watching just the feature films consecutively, might seem to be hardly any passage of time.\n\nWhat's more, if the viewer makes the jump from Toy Story 3<\/em> immediately into\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, Woody isn't really shown as being loved by Bonnie. Sure, we get the sequence when she inadvertently takes him home from Sunnyside for playtime in Toy Story 3<\/em>, but that was before we knew he would be her toy at the end. Yes, she plays with him briefly in the opening montage of\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>, but quickly in the next scene she chooses to leave him in her closet.\n\nBut in the shorts and TV specials, we see her treating him as equal as any other toy. She brings him when she goes over to friends' houses. She takes him on car trips. She loves him. It's this love that's absent if we skip quickly from Toy Story 3<\/em> to\u00a0Toy Story 4<\/em>. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Bonnie completely devalued what Andy told her when he gave her Woody. If we don't see that Bonnie once loved Woody, we think Woody's torn decision to go with Bo or stay with Bonnie is based only on a misguided concept of loyalty rather than any substantial relationship.\n\n
\n\nSo Woody leaves. Finally, after years of processing who he is, why he's here, and where he belongs in this world, he acknowledges and accepts something he's never been able to before: that the answers to those questions change as time passes. There isn't one concrete definition for who a person is. Life is more fluid than that. And having made his decision and said goodbye to the toys who have been his family for decades, Woody moves on. As Bonnie's family's RV pulls away and Buzz and Woody share one last look, a familiar riff of music inhabits Randy Newman's score \u2014 the exact same cue that played when Woody appeared onscreen for the very first time in 1995. It seems this is a bookend, after all.","post_title":"[OPINION] Woody \u2014 The Character Arc of Pixar's Most Iconic Hero","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"opinion-woody-the-character-arc-of-pixars-most-iconic-hero","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-31 14:19:33","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-31 21:19:33","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53532","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54529,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-21 14:37:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-21 21:37:43","post_content":"It's been no secret, even from the first teaser last winter, that Frozen 2<\/em> <\/strong>will be epic. If nothing else, the Roman numerals in all the marketing let us know this is going to be a classy affair.\n\nFour new posters released from Disney today continue to highlight the adventurous scope and impressive scale of the sequel, hinting at perhaps a darker, more intricate tale than its predecessor.\n\nOne thing is for sure: WE. CAN'T. WAIT.\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThere's just one month left until Frozen 2 <\/em>debuts in theaters November 22, 2019, directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.\n
Which of these new posters is your favorite?<\/h2>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"'Frozen 2' Character Posters Foreshadow Epic Scale","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"frozen-2-character-posters-foreshadow-epic-scale","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:52:40","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:52:40","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53826","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54520,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-10 19:17:53","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-11 02:17:53","post_content":"\"In times of old, the world was full of wonder and magic, but times change.\"\n\nThese words herald the arrival of Pixar's newest film,\u00a0Onward<\/em><\/strong>, in theaters March 6th, 2020, from director Dan Scanlon (Monsters University<\/em>). The movie stars Chris Pratt and Tom Holland as elf brothers, living in an enchanted realm like the kind we'd typically see in a medieval story but brought forward into the present day. Check out the full trailer below!\n\n
What was your favorite moment from the Onward<\/em> trailer?<\/h1>\nEdited by: Kelly Conley","post_title":"Trailer Premiereth for Pixar's 'Onward' Starring Chris Pratt and Tom Holland","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trailer-premiereth-for-pixars-onward-starring-chris-pratt-and-tom-holland","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:38:13","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:38:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53741","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54517,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-10-07 20:01:55","post_date_gmt":"2019-10-08 03:01:55","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nI'm a Bob Iger stan. Or, at least, I'm a Bob Iger Twitter stan.\n\nI can't help it. Getting push notifications for his tweets is like Christmas morning each time he takes to the Internet. Posts typically arrive with Iger giddy about a new project, sometimes becoming confused with the subtleties of Twitter. One time he posted about Lucasfilm head Kathy Kennedy and mistakenly tagged a Kennedy parody account. This year on the anniversary of his being named Disney CEO, he tweeted about himself in the third person. Sometimes \u2013\u2013 these are my personal favorite \u2013\u2013 he'll chime in on Disney rumors or criticism with sarcasm, such as when he rebuked Captain Marvel<\/em> naysayers by claiming Disney would build \"a Captain Marvel<\/em> land with 50 Captain Marvel<\/em> attractions, plus Captain Marvel<\/em> cruise ships, hotels, and parades.\" HE. IS. WORTH. THE. FOLLOW. GO. FOLLOW. HIM.\n\nAnyway, these remarks (both in tone and in typo errors) feel out of place for the otherwise professional, businesslike stance Iger takes nearly everywhere else he publicly communicates. For the leader of a major corporation, Iger's tweets humanize him and remind us that he's a real person with, apparently, quite an offbeat personality that doesn't often come across in interviews. The same revelatory experience is found in Iger's new book, The Ride of a Lifetime: Lessons Learned from 15 Years as CEO of The Walt Disney Company. <\/em>Curiously published from Random House rather than Disney Editions, the book pairs legends from his Disney tenure with practical leadership advice. This goes all the way back to 1974, when Iger began his first job with ABC. Many times throughout the book, Iger writes directly to the reader with wisdom relating not just to the business world, but to professional relationships, work\/life balance, friendships in the workplace, and other topics. The purpose is clearly to impart wisdom from major career moments rather than be a biography, and the extrapolation of proverbial business lessons is a large part of the narrative here.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nThe book reads as surprisingly candid, with Iger not beating around the bush at any moment. He discusses with minimal secrecy the security measures of a potential Walt Disney World terrorist attack. He talks at length about the muddled reputation Roy E. Disney carried, marred by a rosy public-facing image the company projected. He openly shares the exit of former CEO Michael Eisner, a tale Iger claims was partially falsely reported in the widespread book Disney War<\/em>. He's very direct in discussing the flaws of his present and prior colleagues and supervisors, again pointing those attributes back to a value the person did or didn't exemplify in an attempt to illustrate a point to the reader.\n\nAt the same time, though, he's always fair (or, at least, appears to be, having no way to verify without knowing the subjects personally). Just as directly as he calls out weaknesses, he acknowledges his own mistakes too, and he equally takes time to build upon others' strengths. His extensive sharing about the friendship he shared with Steve Jobs is particularly touching and revelatory. It's within this realm that the true merit of Iger's book is found, at least for the Disney fan: Here we find stories we've never heard this side of before (deleted scenes, if you will), events that we've only previously known through the lens of facts-only news articles or misconstrued rumors. Here, from the direct source, we have missing moments from Disney history suddenly and delightfully revealed in incredible detail.\n\n
<\/a>\n\nDisney usually waits a while to share its history. Though there's the usual fare of behind-the-scenes footage with each new home video release, these still feel relatively sugar-coated because the product is still new on the market. It's not until a project establishes itself as a time-tested classic (\/until there's no danger of it losing money) that we might hear the real<\/em> story of what went down \u2013\u2013 the hurdles, the obstacles, the production challenges, the difficult conversations, the creative disagreements. It wasn't until the Platinum Edition DVD collection began in 2001 that we really heard Disney share the full scope of production stories from its Renaissance-era films of the '90s. It's 2019 and we're just getting scraps of tales from the making of 2009's The Princess and the Frog<\/em> as its tenth-anniversary festivities set in motion. Likewise, Bob Iger has been CEO of The Walt Disney Company since 2005, and while we know the basics of what he's accomplished, we haven't really heard the full extent of these important moments in Disney history... (dramatic music) until now.\n\nWith Iger's reign largely anchoring on acquisitions of existing brands into the Disney fold, each of these purchases takes a significant portion of the book, beginning with Pixar and continuing with Marvel and Lucasfilm, and even touching on Fox at the end. We find out what Steve Jobs told Iger just 30 minutes before the Pixar purchase was announced that could have reversed the deal. We hear what convinced Marvel's prior owner to consider selling. We discover what happened behind the scenes with George Lucas during the production of The Force Awakens<\/em>. Iger's business acumen throughout keeps this prose from being overly gossipy \u2013\u2013 it always has a point, and (again, seemingly) always shares a fair perspective without being skewed or opinionated.\n\nFor a Disney fan, this reads as a soap opera with some sage advice sprinkled throughout. For those seeking a leadership-oriented book, this reads as an excellent delve into the mind of one of the world's most prominent leaders, offering helpful anecdotes guiding through his intricate thought processes. The \"life lessons\" aspect of the book might be a bit tangential at times, but this is forgiven by Iger's obvious passion for his career and his clear intent to make this book worthwhile for those who read it. Like his Twitter profile sometimes lets slip, Bob Iger loves what he does. And he equally loves sharing it. We have no choice but to stan.\n\n \n\nPurchase<\/a>","post_title":"[BOOK REVIEW] 'Ride of a Lifetime' is Disney CEO Bob Iger's Iconic Twitter Novelized","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"book-review-ride-of-a-lifetime-is-disney-ceo-bob-igers-iconic-twitter-novelized","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2019-10-28 17:30:57","post_modified_gmt":"2019-10-29 00:30:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.rotoscopers.com\/?p=53709","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":54423,"post_author":"10","post_date":"2019-09-23 14:53:43","post_date_gmt":"2019-09-23 21:53:43","post_content":"
<\/a>\n\nWith official first day of fall \u2013\u2013 and now less than two months away from the release of Frozen 2 \u2013\u2013 Disney dropped a new trailer for the highly anticipated sequel.\n\nCheck it out!\n\n
<\/a>\n
\n \t
<\/a>\n
\n \t