<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sony&#8217;s Animated &#8216;Ghostbusters&#8217; Movie has Found its Director	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/</link>
	<description>Animation News, Reviews, Interviews, Podcasts &#38; Videos!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pantufla Ocho		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25551</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pantufla Ocho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=37573#comment-25551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25550&quot;&gt;Dave 52&lt;/a&gt;.

Sorry I mistake the word Wish with Think
El 18 mar. 2016 7:07 PM, &quot;Disqus&quot;  escribió:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25550">Dave 52</a>.</p>
<p>Sorry I mistake the word Wish with Think<br />
El 18 mar. 2016 7:07 PM, &#8220;Disqus&#8221;  escribió:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave 52		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25550</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave 52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=37573#comment-25550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25446&quot;&gt;Pantufla Ocho&lt;/a&gt;.

Why?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25446">Pantufla Ocho</a>.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pantufla Ocho		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pantufla Ocho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=37573#comment-25446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wish that this would end up in development for ever like a lot of the SPA movies ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish that this would end up in development for ever like a lot of the SPA movies </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SwanburneGirl		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25441</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SwanburneGirl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=37573#comment-25441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25440&quot;&gt;Malcolm Rambert&lt;/a&gt;.

Eh, to each their own. Personally, I thought it was pretty funny- and Erin is literally me, so there&#039;s that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25440">Malcolm Rambert</a>.</p>
<p>Eh, to each their own. Personally, I thought it was pretty funny- and Erin is literally me, so there&#8217;s that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Malcolm Rambert		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malcolm Rambert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 02:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=37573#comment-25440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25423&quot;&gt;SwanburneGirl&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s not because of the all-female cast (I personally feel when they announced that fact it felt super patronizing). The majority of people who are upset with the trailer is because 1) the jokes aren&#039;t that funny and 2) it looks like retelling of the same story. If you look at the original Ghostbusters movie, it worked because you had a ridiculous premise that was made fun by a group of people from SNL. While they&#039;re doing that with this new reboot, it&#039;s already been done and they should have just done something new in terms of story. Heck, if they didn&#039;t have the &quot;Ghostbusters&quot; name, I bet you most people would be more open to it. Overall, it just looks like another unnecessary reboot that&#039;s banking on nostalgia.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25423">SwanburneGirl</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not because of the all-female cast (I personally feel when they announced that fact it felt super patronizing). The majority of people who are upset with the trailer is because 1) the jokes aren&#8217;t that funny and 2) it looks like retelling of the same story. If you look at the original Ghostbusters movie, it worked because you had a ridiculous premise that was made fun by a group of people from SNL. While they&#8217;re doing that with this new reboot, it&#8217;s already been done and they should have just done something new in terms of story. Heck, if they didn&#8217;t have the &#8220;Ghostbusters&#8221; name, I bet you most people would be more open to it. Overall, it just looks like another unnecessary reboot that&#8217;s banking on nostalgia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Q-A the Authoress		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25436</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Q-A the Authoress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=37573#comment-25436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25432&quot;&gt;brandon&lt;/a&gt;.

Still feels like one, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25432">brandon</a>.</p>
<p>Still feels like one, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: brandon		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25432</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=37573#comment-25432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25429&quot;&gt;Q-A the Authoress&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s not a fallback plan. The animated films for Spider-Man and Ghostbusters are really something extra on the side, something that will complement the live-action films. Smurfs is a straight-up reboot. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25429">Q-A the Authoress</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a fallback plan. The animated films for Spider-Man and Ghostbusters are really something extra on the side, something that will complement the live-action films. Smurfs is a straight-up reboot. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Q-A the Authoress		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25429</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Q-A the Authoress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=37573#comment-25429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow, so Sony already thinks the reboot of Ghostbusters is going to suck and they&#039;re doing a cartoon fallback plan like they did with Spider-Man and the Smurfs? XP Sony, what are you guys doing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, so Sony already thinks the reboot of Ghostbusters is going to suck and they&#8217;re doing a cartoon fallback plan like they did with Spider-Man and the Smurfs? XP Sony, what are you guys doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave 52		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave 52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 02:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=37573#comment-25426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25416&quot;&gt;Callum J&lt;/a&gt;.

To be fair we don&#039;t actually know how the reboot will turn out until it&#039;s released. Also, there have been some good SPA movies and it does look like they are learning from their mistakes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25416">Callum J</a>.</p>
<p>To be fair we don&#8217;t actually know how the reboot will turn out until it&#8217;s released. Also, there have been some good SPA movies and it does look like they are learning from their mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SwanburneGirl		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/03/10/sonys-animated-ghostbusters-movie-has-found-its-director/#comment-25423</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SwanburneGirl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=37573#comment-25423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry, but I&#039;m rooting for the reboot over this. It looks hilarious, and it&#039;s so nice to see a movie that&#039;s just focusing on the friendships between a team of girls instead of having them be jealous and catty toward each other 24/7. I really don&#039;t get all the hate- why are people getting so worked up about it? If it was an all-male cast and pretty much the same plot, I bet you would be fine with it...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I&#8217;m rooting for the reboot over this. It looks hilarious, and it&#8217;s so nice to see a movie that&#8217;s just focusing on the friendships between a team of girls instead of having them be jealous and catty toward each other 24/7. I really don&#8217;t get all the hate- why are people getting so worked up about it? If it was an all-male cast and pretty much the same plot, I bet you would be fine with it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
