<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Future Quest #1 &#8211; The Spoiler Review/Discussion!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/</link>
	<description>Animation News, Reviews, Interviews, Podcasts &#38; Videos!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Susan Gallagher		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-32759</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Gallagher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=39073#comment-32759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-30153&quot;&gt;dougo13&lt;/a&gt;.

Not sure about mixing magic and sci-fi elements  - but TOTALLY agree about the female Impossible! As I feared, she is taking attention from the original 3 and affecting their interaction. And while Jonny Quest was a show for both boys and girls to enjoy - I loved it - adding the female member didn&#039;t work there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-30153">dougo13</a>.</p>
<p>Not sure about mixing magic and sci-fi elements  &#8211; but TOTALLY agree about the female Impossible! As I feared, she is taking attention from the original 3 and affecting their interaction. And while Jonny Quest was a show for both boys and girls to enjoy &#8211; I loved it &#8211; adding the female member didn&#8217;t work there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dougo13		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-30153</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dougo13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=39073#comment-30153</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Adding a female member to the Impossibles seems just as wrong as adding a male singing member to Josie and the Pussycats. Playing up too much to the PC crowd these days IMO. It&#039;s like adding the female cast member to the teenage version of Jonny Quest. That guaranteed the failure of the show IMO. Jonny, especially was a BOY&#039;s show. The Japanese have it right when they call shows boys or girls shows. Why can&#039;t we? And no Shazzan? What&#039;s up with that? Even in the old cartoons, Space Ghost met him. Much too powerful a character or no way to add the magic element? Going to see a lot more magic in comics with the debut of the Dr. Strange movie. Well, hopefully we will never see a slimmed down version of Herbie, who for all time SHOULD remain as The Fat Fury. I guess ACG characters will be the next bunch to get plundered by modern writers...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding a female member to the Impossibles seems just as wrong as adding a male singing member to Josie and the Pussycats. Playing up too much to the PC crowd these days IMO. It&#8217;s like adding the female cast member to the teenage version of Jonny Quest. That guaranteed the failure of the show IMO. Jonny, especially was a BOY&#8217;s show. The Japanese have it right when they call shows boys or girls shows. Why can&#8217;t we? And no Shazzan? What&#8217;s up with that? Even in the old cartoons, Space Ghost met him. Much too powerful a character or no way to add the magic element? Going to see a lot more magic in comics with the debut of the Dr. Strange movie. Well, hopefully we will never see a slimmed down version of Herbie, who for all time SHOULD remain as The Fat Fury. I guess ACG characters will be the next bunch to get plundered by modern writers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Susan Gallagher		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-27549</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Gallagher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=39073#comment-27549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-27539&quot;&gt;brandon&lt;/a&gt;.

They have still added this new member to the Impossibles - too drastic a change, a deal-breaker for me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-27539">brandon</a>.</p>
<p>They have still added this new member to the Impossibles &#8211; too drastic a change, a deal-breaker for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: brandon		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-27539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=39073#comment-27539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-27520&quot;&gt;Susan Gallagher&lt;/a&gt;.

I have to disagree. There&#039;s nothing in Future Quest that doesn&#039;t scream &#039;light-hearted&#039;. &#039;campy&#039; is debatable, but Gloop and Gleep (those two little jelly-beans with eyes from The Herculoids) are featured in Shaner&#039;s splash-page cover and Birdman still shouts his name when he flies into action. There&#039;s a really fun, adventurous tone all throughout the first issue, with plenty of epic and dramatic moments to spare. 

As far as your concerns about The Impossibles, I can only say (with kindness) that your fears are largely unfounded. Look at the cover for Future Quest #1 (the splash page). What exactly is &#039;realistic&#039; about what&#039;s being presented? If the universe of Future Quest can have an intergalactic alien superhero, a superhero secret agent with powers granted from an Egyptian god, a prehistoric superhero with a magical club and a pet dinosaur,  a young boy who&#039;s best friend is a giant robot, and a family of humanoid aliens who&#039;s companions are a flying space dragon, a rock ape, and a dinosaur hybrid who can shoot frickin LASERS out of its cannon-horn, then I don&#039;t think a team of teen superheroes are going to break the rules of an already fantastical world.


Finally, who cares if The Impossibles are given a female member. There are already a lot of male characters in the Hanna-Barbera line, so what&#039;s the harm in diversifying whenever it&#039;s appropriate?


Sorry for my long rant, but I assume you are not one to be easily swayed, which is fine. But your view of Future Quest is quite different from the reality.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-27520">Susan Gallagher</a>.</p>
<p>I have to disagree. There&#8217;s nothing in Future Quest that doesn&#8217;t scream &#8216;light-hearted&#8217;. &#8216;campy&#8217; is debatable, but Gloop and Gleep (those two little jelly-beans with eyes from The Herculoids) are featured in Shaner&#8217;s splash-page cover and Birdman still shouts his name when he flies into action. There&#8217;s a really fun, adventurous tone all throughout the first issue, with plenty of epic and dramatic moments to spare. </p>
<p>As far as your concerns about The Impossibles, I can only say (with kindness) that your fears are largely unfounded. Look at the cover for Future Quest #1 (the splash page). What exactly is &#8216;realistic&#8217; about what&#8217;s being presented? If the universe of Future Quest can have an intergalactic alien superhero, a superhero secret agent with powers granted from an Egyptian god, a prehistoric superhero with a magical club and a pet dinosaur,  a young boy who&#8217;s best friend is a giant robot, and a family of humanoid aliens who&#8217;s companions are a flying space dragon, a rock ape, and a dinosaur hybrid who can shoot frickin LASERS out of its cannon-horn, then I don&#8217;t think a team of teen superheroes are going to break the rules of an already fantastical world.</p>
<p>Finally, who cares if The Impossibles are given a female member. There are already a lot of male characters in the Hanna-Barbera line, so what&#8217;s the harm in diversifying whenever it&#8217;s appropriate?</p>
<p>Sorry for my long rant, but I assume you are not one to be easily swayed, which is fine. But your view of Future Quest is quite different from the reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Susan Gallagher		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2016/06/09/future-quest-1-the-spoiler-reviewdiscussion/#comment-27520</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Gallagher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=39073#comment-27520</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The addition of that new female member in my all-time favourites Impossibles has totally put me off this - I feel she will take attention from the originals, (already is by people asking about her)!!! and spoil the interaction between them which was so important in the cartoon. I don&#039;t think they fit in well here, in any case - they have a more light-hearted, campy story style so fitting them in will mean more than just making them look more realistic. There is little Impossibles merchandise about and it would have been nice to have something to celebrate their 50th anniversary this year - for me, this isn&#039;t it. Really disappointed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The addition of that new female member in my all-time favourites Impossibles has totally put me off this &#8211; I feel she will take attention from the originals, (already is by people asking about her)!!! and spoil the interaction between them which was so important in the cartoon. I don&#8217;t think they fit in well here, in any case &#8211; they have a more light-hearted, campy story style so fitting them in will mean more than just making them look more realistic. There is little Impossibles merchandise about and it would have been nice to have something to celebrate their 50th anniversary this year &#8211; for me, this isn&#8217;t it. Really disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
