<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Test Animation for Sony&#8217;s &#8216;Popeye&#8217; is Perfectly Cartoony	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/</link>
	<description>Animation News, Reviews, Interviews, Podcasts &#38; Videos!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 20:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Not Without		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11175</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not Without]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=18825#comment-11175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11131&quot;&gt;Darren&lt;/a&gt;.

So happy the Peanuts are getting proper dot eyes. No tatts, no pipe who is this guy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11131">Darren</a>.</p>
<p>So happy the Peanuts are getting proper dot eyes. No tatts, no pipe who is this guy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Not Without		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11174</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not Without]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=18825#comment-11174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11147&quot;&gt;Alex Davis&lt;/a&gt;.

&#062;Oh, great! Another 2D purist who refuses to accept CGI.   


I don&#039;t think that&#039;s really fair.  I completely &quot;accept&quot; CGI, I just don&#039;t think it works with everything.  I also don&#039;t understand why we are subject to only one style of CGI.  At least with the upcoming Peanuts film, they are working to innovate an not give us this same homogenized plastiscine photo-realistic crap.  At some point design will be re-welcomed into animation but right now these films all look alike.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11147">Alex Davis</a>.</p>
<p>&gt;Oh, great! Another 2D purist who refuses to accept CGI.   </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s really fair.  I completely &#8220;accept&#8221; CGI, I just don&#8217;t think it works with everything.  I also don&#8217;t understand why we are subject to only one style of CGI.  At least with the upcoming Peanuts film, they are working to innovate an not give us this same homogenized plastiscine photo-realistic crap.  At some point design will be re-welcomed into animation but right now these films all look alike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephi		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11163</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 05:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=18825#comment-11163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This looks amazing!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Juuchan17		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11149</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juuchan17]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2014 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=18825#comment-11149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Whoa... that looks good, even for test animation! I am NOW excited for this. This is the right type of cartoony sort style for Popeye, though traditional animation would be classically preferred in my opinion...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa&#8230; that looks good, even for test animation! I am NOW excited for this. This is the right type of cartoony sort style for Popeye, though traditional animation would be classically preferred in my opinion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex Davis		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=18825#comment-11147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11122&quot;&gt;StampMotionStudio&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh, great! Another 2D purist who refuses to accept CGI. You do realize that they&#039;re trying to create a form of CGI that captures the quality of the hand drawn animation, right? If you are so against the medium, stick with the original show and don&#039;t whine about the fact that it&#039;s not hand-drawn. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11122">StampMotionStudio</a>.</p>
<p>Oh, great! Another 2D purist who refuses to accept CGI. You do realize that they&#8217;re trying to create a form of CGI that captures the quality of the hand drawn animation, right? If you are so against the medium, stick with the original show and don&#8217;t whine about the fact that it&#8217;s not hand-drawn. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JustinJun		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11145</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustinJun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=18825#comment-11145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The animation looks AMAAAZING!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The animation looks AMAAAZING!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Darren		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=18825#comment-11131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why are CG filmmakers afraid to use dots for eyes?  It just looks weird on Popeye.  No arm tattoos, no pipe either.  It&#039;s a  watered-down Popeye.  Safe for the kiddies, because the original Popeye made me into a violent, heavy smoker with tattoos all over my body.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are CG filmmakers afraid to use dots for eyes?  It just looks weird on Popeye.  No arm tattoos, no pipe either.  It&#8217;s a  watered-down Popeye.  Safe for the kiddies, because the original Popeye made me into a violent, heavy smoker with tattoos all over my body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blake Taylor		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11128</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=18825#comment-11128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This looks fantastic. Wow. Love the look and tone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks fantastic. Wow. Love the look and tone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StampMotionStudio		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StampMotionStudio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=18825#comment-11122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh No, Please not CGI! Why not stay to the original feel, hand drawn?!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh No, Please not CGI! Why not stay to the original feel, hand drawn?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Max den Hartog		</title>
		<link>https://www.rotoscopers.com/2014/09/18/test-animation-for-sonys-popeye-is-perfectly-cartoony/#comment-11121</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max den Hartog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscopers.com/?p=18825#comment-11121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This looks amazing! Way to go Sony Animation! I&#039;ve always been impressed with the animation in Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs and Hotel Transylvania and the animation in this animation test looks once again like a big win for the studio! I can&#039;t wait to see more of this project!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks amazing! Way to go Sony Animation! I&#8217;ve always been impressed with the animation in Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs and Hotel Transylvania and the animation in this animation test looks once again like a big win for the studio! I can&#8217;t wait to see more of this project!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
