I respect that, I’m just trying to understand the WHY of it. Like, if it’s a free add-on, it’s free and it doesn’t take up any more room. So it doesn’t seem like something to be against! 🙂 I am also not a fan of the cash-in “two” movies, but my Emperor’s New Groove on Blu-ray came with Kronk’s New Groove and I’ll probably never watch it, but I have no reason to be against them giving it to me for free. I understand your opinion is “don’t bundle” I just don’t know why that is. Do you feel it undercuts the value of the original or something? Don’t like seeing two titles on the spine of a DVD cover? I was just wondering if there was reasoning behind your thoughts on the bundle thing. 🙂

For the vast majority of Jungle Book fans, they DON’T want the sequel attached. So keeping them separate is a good thing in my opinion. As one of those fans, I’m grateful it’s not attached to the original film.

Yes, you have to pay extra money to see this one if you REALLY want to own Jungle Book 2, but…that’s life. I’m personally NEVER a fan of the 2-movie collections, even if I LOVE both films. I think they should never be bundled. Just my opinion.

A dual pack doesn’t do this? I’m confused. Why would anyone who wants Jungle Book 2 not also want Jungle Book 1 for essentially the exact same price? (Another question would be “Why would anyone want Jungle Book 2 at ALL” but that’s a different story.) The cash-in sequels from that era of Disney Animation are all atrocious, but if they come for free with the good, original version I see zero harm in bundling them together. I don’t quite understand why anyone would want to pay $30 twice to get them both instead of $30 once (and save shelf space to boot). My apologies, I’m just confused about that one.