Comments on: Could ‘Frozen’ Confirm That Disney Is Now Superior To Pixar?

By: Ray Liptak

Ray Liptak — Sat, 23 Aug 2014 02:04:00 +0000

In reply to Supreme Hater. You first

By: Supreme Hater

Supreme Hater — Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:00:00 +0000

In reply to Ray Liptak. Die.

By: Jackie

Jackie — Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:58:00 +0000

Frozen sucks. Let It Go sucks. Highly overrated movie only because they got Idina (AKA Elphaba in Wicked) to play the lead. And no offense to Idina, I find your voice great, but you come across as belty and bland in this.

By: kuzronk

kuzronk — Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:23:00 +0000

It’s not superior but the latest couple PIXAR films have been weak.

By: tt

tt — Sat, 04 Jan 2014 20:12:00 +0000

In reply to Not Without. Pixar only came to in the 2000s. Disney was as successful as Pixar in the 1940s, but due to the World War, it was stopped. if the WW never came, Disney would've dominated the 90s. and ive always considered Disney to be superior to Pixar, no matter the situations. their legacies and their ability to rise back up after hard times r too impressive to dismiss, but Pixar was created during times of peace. if Pixar was in the 90s, they would've gone the same direction and fell in quality.

By: khongor

khongor — Sat, 04 Jan 2014 10:58:00 +0000

I agree that Disney movies are great.
But Pixar movies have some magics in it.
And yes, Frozen & Tangled were good movies but i think Brave could easily beat them both, while those 2 were good they were too predictable on the second hand Brave was just perfect

By: Nathan C.

Nathan C. — Fri, 03 Jan 2014 02:16:00 +0000

In reply to Ray Liptak.

(This is a reply to your comment that I somehow can’t reply to)

If Pixar can’t come close to Disney phenomenal success, why are the Rotoscopers even bothering to compare the two? Pixar is fantastic at what they do, and so is Disney. By the way, Pixar has some great ideas coming down the pike (The Good Dinosaur, Inside Out). If these films put them back on track quality-wise, what would be different when compared to Disney? Sure, Pixar is a relatively new company, but hasn’t Disney been down this road before, too? The Cars 2 of today could be The Black Caldron of the Disney’s early years (pardon the comparison, I’m not saying they’re of the same quality, but of the same scenario).

By: Ray Liptak

Ray Liptak — Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:02:00 +0000

In reply to UFO. Lotr is unwatchable and boring to me.

By: Nathan C.

Nathan C. — Thu, 02 Jan 2014 03:34:00 +0000

In reply to Ray Liptak.

Planes isn’t made by Pixar, but by Disneytoon Studios (the people who produced Tinker Bell). That in itself explains the inferior quality.

As for the other three, comparing their quality to the recent Disney movies doesn’t move me. DIsney has had more critical failures then Pixar, so I don’t understand why people make the comparison.

Now I’ll admit, I haven’t seen Frozen yet, but as far as I’m concerned, Disney has a lot of ground to cover before they can be considered “superior” to Pixar.

By: Ray Liptak

Ray Liptak — Wed, 01 Jan 2014 23:59:00 +0000

In reply to Nathan C.. Cars 2, brave, monsters u, and planes are all wildly inferior to tangled, wreck-it-Ralph, and now frozen. maybe since Lasseter took the big job at Disney his quality control is pointed there.